The Construction of Community at Early Bronze Age Karataş-Semayük, Southwestern Anatolia

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Donovan M. Adams, Marin A. Pilloud, Ali Metin Büyükkarakaya
{"title":"The Construction of Community at Early Bronze Age Karataş-Semayük, Southwestern Anatolia","authors":"Donovan M. Adams,&nbsp;Marin A. Pilloud,&nbsp;Ali Metin Büyükkarakaya","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The present study seeks to examine biological kinship structures as expressed in mortuary treatment and postmarital residence practices of the Early Bronze Age (c. 3000–2000 BCE) Karataş-Semayük in southwestern Anatolia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Dental morphology and metrics of 451 (<i>n</i><sub>female</sub> = 47; <i>n</i><sub>male</sub> = 67) individuals were examined for biological distance analyses. Gower's coefficient of similarity and Non-Euclidean Fuzzy Relational Clustering (NEFRC) were used to examine phenotypic similarities between individuals and associations with burial location. Binomial and Fisher's exact tests were used to examine significant differences in rare traits between burial locations. Mean pairwise differences, diversity indices, and modified signed-likelihood ratio tests for the equality of coefficients of variation examined significant differences in shape and size variation between males and females.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals did not cluster based on burial location or unit for either the Gower's or NEFRC analyses. Additionally, rare traits were not clustered in specific burial locations. Females consistently showed greater metric and morphological variation compared to males, reaching statistical significance in mean pairwise difference tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>These results suggest that burial location was not strongly defined by biological kinship units or lineages. Rather, a negotiation of various social identities likely influenced the expression of group membership in mortuary practice. Additionally, Karataş-Semayük likely practiced a bilocal residence pattern with a virilocal bias. The significant incorporation of outside females in the local community and the lack of biologically constrained burial practice may have simultaneously contributed to a cohesive community identity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"186 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The present study seeks to examine biological kinship structures as expressed in mortuary treatment and postmarital residence practices of the Early Bronze Age (c. 3000–2000 BCE) Karataş-Semayük in southwestern Anatolia.

Materials and Methods

Dental morphology and metrics of 451 (nfemale = 47; nmale = 67) individuals were examined for biological distance analyses. Gower's coefficient of similarity and Non-Euclidean Fuzzy Relational Clustering (NEFRC) were used to examine phenotypic similarities between individuals and associations with burial location. Binomial and Fisher's exact tests were used to examine significant differences in rare traits between burial locations. Mean pairwise differences, diversity indices, and modified signed-likelihood ratio tests for the equality of coefficients of variation examined significant differences in shape and size variation between males and females.

Results

Individuals did not cluster based on burial location or unit for either the Gower's or NEFRC analyses. Additionally, rare traits were not clustered in specific burial locations. Females consistently showed greater metric and morphological variation compared to males, reaching statistical significance in mean pairwise difference tests.

Discussion

These results suggest that burial location was not strongly defined by biological kinship units or lineages. Rather, a negotiation of various social identities likely influenced the expression of group membership in mortuary practice. Additionally, Karataş-Semayük likely practiced a bilocal residence pattern with a virilocal bias. The significant incorporation of outside females in the local community and the lack of biologically constrained burial practice may have simultaneously contributed to a cohesive community identity.

安纳托利亚西南部karata - semay k地区青铜时代早期的社区建设
本研究旨在研究安纳托利亚西南部karata - semay k地区早期青铜时代(公元前3000-2000年)的殡葬和婚后居住习俗所表达的生物亲属结构。材料与方法451例(女性47例;对67例个体进行生物距离分析。采用高尔相似系数和非欧几里得模糊关系聚类(NEFRC)来研究个体之间的表型相似性及其与埋葬地点的关联。二项和费雪的精确检验被用来检验埋葬地点之间罕见性状的显著差异。平均两两差异、多样性指数和变异系数相等性的修正符号似然比检验检验了男女之间形状和大小变异的显著差异。结果在Gower和NEFRC的分析中,个体没有基于埋葬地点或单位聚类。此外,罕见的性状没有聚集在特定的埋葬地点。与雄性相比,雌性始终表现出更大的度量和形态变异,在平均两两差异检验中达到统计学意义。这些结果表明,埋葬地点并不是由生物学上的亲属单位或谱系所决定的。相反,各种社会身份的协商可能影响了太平间实践中群体成员的表达。此外,karata - semay可能实行了一种带有virillocal偏见的双地居住模式。外来女性在当地社区的大量融入,以及缺乏生物限制的埋葬习俗,可能同时有助于形成一种有凝聚力的社区身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信