Pre-fabricated TRC Panels Versus TRM Jacketing for Integrating Seismic and Energy Retrofitting: Bi-Directional Shaking Table Tests on Three Masonry-Infilled RC Buildings

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Eun Rim Baek, Daniel Alexander Pohoryles, Dionysios A. Bournas
{"title":"Pre-fabricated TRC Panels Versus TRM Jacketing for Integrating Seismic and Energy Retrofitting: Bi-Directional Shaking Table Tests on Three Masonry-Infilled RC Buildings","authors":"Eun Rim Baek,&nbsp;Daniel Alexander Pohoryles,&nbsp;Dionysios A. Bournas","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two novel integrated seismic and energy retrofitting solutions for existing buildings are experimentally assessed in this study. Three 60%-scaled, two-storey infilled reinforced concrete buildings underwent a series of bi-directional shaking table tests. The control building represented a part of a typical Korean school building with seismic design deficiencies and suffered out-of-plane (OOP) failure of the second-storey infill panels at maximum considered earthquake. Two retrofitting schemes based on textile-reinforced cement-based composites were evaluated as follows: (1) newly developed ‘textile capillary-tube panels’ (TCPs), namely pre-fabricated textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) with integrated capillary tubes, and (2) a combination of textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) with thermal insulation. Additionally, the presence of openings in the infills, as well as the effect of different types of anchorage of the textile reinforcement were studied. At the design level earthquake, both retrofitted buildings presented next to no damage, compared to the control structure that was in a state of near-collapse. The retrofitted structures reached double the intensity of the design earthquake, with the shaking table reaching its maximum acceleration capacity, yet no irreversible damage was observed. The strength increase for both retrofitted buildings was +110% compared to the un-retrofitted building in the direction with openings, in which both buildings were retrofitted with TRM. For the fully infilled direction, the TRM-retrofitted building recorded more than double the inter-storey drifts compared to the TCP-retrofit, and reached its peak strength (+120% compared to the control building). The TCP-retrofitted building, instead, displayed a stiffer response with reduced deformations due to the carbon textiles employed in the precast panels. For both retrofits OOP damage was prevented, also demonstrated by the measured accelerations at the centre of the infills.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 6","pages":"1617-1641"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4327","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two novel integrated seismic and energy retrofitting solutions for existing buildings are experimentally assessed in this study. Three 60%-scaled, two-storey infilled reinforced concrete buildings underwent a series of bi-directional shaking table tests. The control building represented a part of a typical Korean school building with seismic design deficiencies and suffered out-of-plane (OOP) failure of the second-storey infill panels at maximum considered earthquake. Two retrofitting schemes based on textile-reinforced cement-based composites were evaluated as follows: (1) newly developed ‘textile capillary-tube panels’ (TCPs), namely pre-fabricated textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) with integrated capillary tubes, and (2) a combination of textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) with thermal insulation. Additionally, the presence of openings in the infills, as well as the effect of different types of anchorage of the textile reinforcement were studied. At the design level earthquake, both retrofitted buildings presented next to no damage, compared to the control structure that was in a state of near-collapse. The retrofitted structures reached double the intensity of the design earthquake, with the shaking table reaching its maximum acceleration capacity, yet no irreversible damage was observed. The strength increase for both retrofitted buildings was +110% compared to the un-retrofitted building in the direction with openings, in which both buildings were retrofitted with TRM. For the fully infilled direction, the TRM-retrofitted building recorded more than double the inter-storey drifts compared to the TCP-retrofit, and reached its peak strength (+120% compared to the control building). The TCP-retrofitted building, instead, displayed a stiffer response with reduced deformations due to the carbon textiles employed in the precast panels. For both retrofits OOP damage was prevented, also demonstrated by the measured accelerations at the centre of the infills.

Abstract Image

预制TRC面板与TRM护套集成地震和能源改造:三个砌体混凝土建筑的双向振动台试验
本研究对现有建筑的两种新型综合地震和能源改造方案进行了实验评估。三个60%比例的两层填充钢筋混凝土建筑进行了一系列双向振动台试验。控制建筑代表了典型的韩国学校建筑的一部分,具有抗震设计缺陷,并且在考虑的最大地震时,第二层填充板遭受了面外(OOP)破坏。本文对基于纺织增强水泥基复合材料的两种改造方案进行了评估:(1)新开发的“纺织毛细管板”(TCPs),即预制纺织增强混凝土(TRC)与集成毛细管;(2)纺织增强砂浆(TRM)与保温材料的组合。此外,还研究了填充物中开口的存在,以及不同类型的纺织加固锚固的影响。在设计级地震中,与处于近乎倒塌状态的控制结构相比,两座改造后的建筑几乎没有损坏。改造后的结构达到了设计地震强度的两倍,振动台达到了最大加速度容量,但没有观察到不可逆的损伤。在有开口的方向上,与未进行改造的建筑相比,这两座建筑的强度增加了+110%,这两座建筑都进行了TRM改造。对于完全填充的方向,trm改造后的建筑记录的层间位移是tcp改造后的两倍多,并且达到了其峰值强度(与对照建筑相比增加了120%)。tcp改造的建筑,相反,显示出更强的响应与减少变形,由于在预制板采用碳纺织品。对于这两种改造,都防止了OOP损坏,填充物中心测量的加速度也证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信