Quantifying the Relationships Between Health Sector Strategic Planning Practices and Health Sector Results in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mwandu Kini Jiyenze, Henry Mollel, Charles Tundui
{"title":"Quantifying the Relationships Between Health Sector Strategic Planning Practices and Health Sector Results in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Mwandu Kini Jiyenze,&nbsp;Henry Mollel,&nbsp;Charles Tundui","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>There is still limited evidence on the relationships between strategic planning practices and strategic results in the health sector. The study aimed to examine and quantify these relationships in Tanzania.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study involving 290 council health managers from 23 councils was conducted. We used a questionnaire to collect data on health sector strategic planning practices and health sector results related to health sector strategic plan IV (HSSP). We analyze the data using descriptive methods analysis, factor analysis, and multiple regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings showed separately that HSSP formulation practices had a positive, weak, and significant relationship with perceived health sector results; HSSP implementation practices had a positive, moderate, and significant relationship with perceived health sector results; HSSP monitoring and evaluation had a positive, strong, and significant relation with perceived health sector results. Furthermore, jointly, all the practices of HSSP formulation, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation were positively related to perceived strategic health sector results, and findings indicated that only HSSP implementation and monitoring and evaluation practices were significantly and positively related to the health sector results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study provides additional evidence to the ongoing debate on the relationships between strategic planning practices and strategic results in the health sector and the public sector. Overall, our evidence suggests that only the HSSP implementation and HSSP monitoring and evaluation practices are significantly and positively related to strategic health sector results. We recommend that the council health managers continue to engage in the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation practices to enhance their chances of achieving the strategic results set out in the health sector strategic plans. We encourage future studies using longitudinal study design, objective and in other settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

There is still limited evidence on the relationships between strategic planning practices and strategic results in the health sector. The study aimed to examine and quantify these relationships in Tanzania.

Methods

A cross-sectional study involving 290 council health managers from 23 councils was conducted. We used a questionnaire to collect data on health sector strategic planning practices and health sector results related to health sector strategic plan IV (HSSP). We analyze the data using descriptive methods analysis, factor analysis, and multiple regression analysis.

Results

Our findings showed separately that HSSP formulation practices had a positive, weak, and significant relationship with perceived health sector results; HSSP implementation practices had a positive, moderate, and significant relationship with perceived health sector results; HSSP monitoring and evaluation had a positive, strong, and significant relation with perceived health sector results. Furthermore, jointly, all the practices of HSSP formulation, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation were positively related to perceived strategic health sector results, and findings indicated that only HSSP implementation and monitoring and evaluation practices were significantly and positively related to the health sector results.

Conclusions

Our study provides additional evidence to the ongoing debate on the relationships between strategic planning practices and strategic results in the health sector and the public sector. Overall, our evidence suggests that only the HSSP implementation and HSSP monitoring and evaluation practices are significantly and positively related to strategic health sector results. We recommend that the council health managers continue to engage in the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation practices to enhance their chances of achieving the strategic results set out in the health sector strategic plans. We encourage future studies using longitudinal study design, objective and in other settings.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信