The Effect of Distraction on Pain Management in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years Old With Acute Leukemia Undergoing Bone Marrow Aspiration

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Soodabeh Razmi, Mehrdad Karajizadeh, Soheila Zarei Fard, Saeideh Pourahmad, Pooria Fazeli, Najmeh Bordbar
{"title":"The Effect of Distraction on Pain Management in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years Old With Acute Leukemia Undergoing Bone Marrow Aspiration","authors":"Soodabeh Razmi,&nbsp;Mehrdad Karajizadeh,&nbsp;Soheila Zarei Fard,&nbsp;Saeideh Pourahmad,&nbsp;Pooria Fazeli,&nbsp;Najmeh Bordbar","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Acute leukemia is considered the most common form of cancer in children. Different painful diagnostic approaches may be applied to diagnose acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children suspected of having the disease, such as blood tests and bone marrow aspiration (BMA). Several studies reported that distraction strategies could alleviate pain severity in children. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of distraction in pain management in children aged 5−12 years old with acute leukemia undergoing BMA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a quasi-experimental study involving 60 participants, using convenience sampling, they were assigned to control (<i>n</i> = 30) and distraction (<i>n</i> = 30) groups. Children in the distraction group watched TV cartoons during BMA, while children in the control group didn't. The children's level of acute pain was measured using Oucher's scale before, 30, and 60 min after the intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean pain severity score immediately before the intervention between the intervention and control groups was markedly different (2.33 ± 1.21 vs. 3.60 ± 1.56, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Also, the mean severity score after 30 min of the second BMA illustrated a significant difference between the intervention and control groups (4.20 ± 1.84 vs. 6.6 ± 2.16, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). We observed a considerable difference between the intervention and control groups regarding the mean severity score after 60 min of the second BMA (2.06 ± 0.82 vs. 4.8 ± 2.34, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The design and implementation of well-developed pain management regularly involving sustained and organized distraction can effectively manage the severity of pain in acute leukemia children undergoing BMA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70634","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Acute leukemia is considered the most common form of cancer in children. Different painful diagnostic approaches may be applied to diagnose acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children suspected of having the disease, such as blood tests and bone marrow aspiration (BMA). Several studies reported that distraction strategies could alleviate pain severity in children. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of distraction in pain management in children aged 5−12 years old with acute leukemia undergoing BMA.

Methods

In a quasi-experimental study involving 60 participants, using convenience sampling, they were assigned to control (n = 30) and distraction (n = 30) groups. Children in the distraction group watched TV cartoons during BMA, while children in the control group didn't. The children's level of acute pain was measured using Oucher's scale before, 30, and 60 min after the intervention.

Results

The mean pain severity score immediately before the intervention between the intervention and control groups was markedly different (2.33 ± 1.21 vs. 3.60 ± 1.56, p = 0.005). Also, the mean severity score after 30 min of the second BMA illustrated a significant difference between the intervention and control groups (4.20 ± 1.84 vs. 6.6 ± 2.16, p < 0.001). We observed a considerable difference between the intervention and control groups regarding the mean severity score after 60 min of the second BMA (2.06 ± 0.82 vs. 4.8 ± 2.34, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The design and implementation of well-developed pain management regularly involving sustained and organized distraction can effectively manage the severity of pain in acute leukemia children undergoing BMA.

Abstract Image

分散注意力对5 ~ 12岁急性白血病骨髓抽吸患儿疼痛管理的影响
背景和目的急性白血病被认为是儿童中最常见的癌症。不同的疼痛诊断方法可用于诊断疑似患有急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的儿童,如血液检查和骨髓穿刺(BMA)。几项研究报告称,分散注意力策略可以减轻儿童的疼痛严重程度。因此,本研究旨在探讨分散注意力在5 - 12岁急性白血病行BMA的儿童疼痛管理中的有效性。方法采用准实验方法,采用方便抽样法,将60名被试分为对照组(n = 30)和分心组(n = 30)。分心组的孩子在BMA期间观看电视动画片,而对照组的孩子则没有。在干预前、干预后30min、干预后60min分别用欧氏量表测量患儿急性疼痛水平。结果干预组与对照组干预前疼痛严重程度平均评分差异有统计学意义(2.33±1.21∶3.60±1.56,p = 0.005)。此外,第二次BMA 30分钟后的平均严重程度评分在干预组和对照组之间也有显著差异(4.20±1.84比6.6±2.16,p < 0.001)。我们观察到干预组和对照组在第二次BMA 60分钟后的平均严重程度评分有相当大的差异(2.06±0.82比4.8±2.34,p < 0.001)。结论设计和实施完善的疼痛管理,包括持续和有组织的分心,可以有效地控制急性白血病儿童BMA的疼痛程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信