Patterns and Potential Consequences of a Changing Sulfur Cycle in High Elevation Wetlands

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Laura T. Rea, Molly E. Huber, Hannah R. Miller, Clifford Adamchak, Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley
{"title":"Patterns and Potential Consequences of a Changing Sulfur Cycle in High Elevation Wetlands","authors":"Laura T. Rea,&nbsp;Molly E. Huber,&nbsp;Hannah R. Miller,&nbsp;Clifford Adamchak,&nbsp;Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ice thaw and enhanced bedrock weathering are increasing sulfate export in alpine streams, which may change sulfur (S) and other biogeochemical cycles in adjacent wetlands. We compared S and carbon (C) concentrations and sulfate reduction rates (SRRs) across three wetland types in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA: snowmelt-fed wetlands (SFWs), periglacial solifluction lobes (PSLs), and subalpine wetlands (SAWs). We found that each wetland type had unique biogeochemical characteristics. Subalpine wetlands had the highest soil C (37.2 ± 8.7%C) and SRRs (29.3 ± 21 nmol mL<sup>−1</sup> soil day <sup>−1</sup>) compared with SFWs and PSLs, which had lower %C and moderate to low SRRs, respectively. Subalpine wetlands accumulated little sulfate, whereas PSLs had high concentrations (0.04 ± 0.04 vs. 0.6 ± 1.4 mg S g<sup>−1</sup> dry soil respectively); SFWs had low sulfate concentrations (0.02 ± 0.01 mg S g<sup>−1</sup> dry soil). Sulfate-S stable isotope data suggest different sources of S in the SFWs and PSLs: atmospheric and geologic, respectively. The data indicate that high C supports high SRRs in SAWs, whereas SRRs may be C-limited and co-limited by C and S in PSLs and SFWs, respectively. With climate warming, SAWs have the greatest potential to release more C to the atmosphere, SFWs will likely decrease in size and experience changes in plant community composition, and PSLs may be sources of acid rock drainage. These data demonstrate different biogeochemical fates of S and C in three wetland types present across alpine landscapes, and notable consequences for biogeochemical cycling as warming continues.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ice thaw and enhanced bedrock weathering are increasing sulfate export in alpine streams, which may change sulfur (S) and other biogeochemical cycles in adjacent wetlands. We compared S and carbon (C) concentrations and sulfate reduction rates (SRRs) across three wetland types in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA: snowmelt-fed wetlands (SFWs), periglacial solifluction lobes (PSLs), and subalpine wetlands (SAWs). We found that each wetland type had unique biogeochemical characteristics. Subalpine wetlands had the highest soil C (37.2 ± 8.7%C) and SRRs (29.3 ± 21 nmol mL−1 soil day −1) compared with SFWs and PSLs, which had lower %C and moderate to low SRRs, respectively. Subalpine wetlands accumulated little sulfate, whereas PSLs had high concentrations (0.04 ± 0.04 vs. 0.6 ± 1.4 mg S g−1 dry soil respectively); SFWs had low sulfate concentrations (0.02 ± 0.01 mg S g−1 dry soil). Sulfate-S stable isotope data suggest different sources of S in the SFWs and PSLs: atmospheric and geologic, respectively. The data indicate that high C supports high SRRs in SAWs, whereas SRRs may be C-limited and co-limited by C and S in PSLs and SFWs, respectively. With climate warming, SAWs have the greatest potential to release more C to the atmosphere, SFWs will likely decrease in size and experience changes in plant community composition, and PSLs may be sources of acid rock drainage. These data demonstrate different biogeochemical fates of S and C in three wetland types present across alpine landscapes, and notable consequences for biogeochemical cycling as warming continues.

高海拔湿地硫循环变化的模式和潜在后果
冰融化和基岩风化作用的增强增加了高山溪流中硫酸盐的输出,从而改变了邻近湿地的硫(S)和其他生物地球化学循环。本文比较了美国科罗拉多落基山脉三种湿地类型(融雪湿地(SFWs)、冰缘溶蚀叶(PSLs)和亚高山湿地(SAWs))的S和C浓度和硫酸盐还原率(SRRs)。研究发现,各湿地类型具有独特的生物地球化学特征。亚高山湿地的土壤C(37.2%±8.7%C)和SRRs(29.3±21 nmol mL−1 soil day−1)均高于sws和psl湿地,后者的%C较低,SRRs为中至低。亚高山湿地的硫酸盐含量较低(0.04±0.04 vs. 0.6±1.4 mg S g−1);SFWs的硫酸盐浓度较低(0.02±0.01 mg S g−1)。硫酸盐-S稳定同位素数据表明sws和PSLs中S的来源不同:分别是大气和地质。数据表明,高C支持SAWs的高srr,而psl和SFWs的srr可能分别受到C限制和C和S的共同限制。随着气候变暖,sws最有可能向大气释放更多的C, sws可能会缩小并经历植物群落组成的变化,psl可能是酸性岩石排水的来源。这些数据表明,在高山景观中存在的三种湿地类型中,S和C的生物地球化学命运不同,并且随着变暖的持续,生物地球化学循环的显著后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信