Assessing the Impacts of Soil Conservation Practices on Surface Runoff and Water Quality Using an Agricultural Experimental Setup, Generalised Additive Mixed Models, and Hydrologic Modelling

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Simon Ricard, Marc-Olivier Gasser, Colline Gombault, Flora Umuhire, Gi-Mick Wu, Neysa Mireille Sawadogo, Arianne Blais-Gagnon, Eduardo Chavez, Jean-Benoît Mathieu, Catherine Bossé, William Huertas, Aubert Michaud
{"title":"Assessing the Impacts of Soil Conservation Practices on Surface Runoff and Water Quality Using an Agricultural Experimental Setup, Generalised Additive Mixed Models, and Hydrologic Modelling","authors":"Simon Ricard,&nbsp;Marc-Olivier Gasser,&nbsp;Colline Gombault,&nbsp;Flora Umuhire,&nbsp;Gi-Mick Wu,&nbsp;Neysa Mireille Sawadogo,&nbsp;Arianne Blais-Gagnon,&nbsp;Eduardo Chavez,&nbsp;Jean-Benoît Mathieu,&nbsp;Catherine Bossé,&nbsp;William Huertas,&nbsp;Aubert Michaud","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil compaction and degraded soil structure can decrease water infiltration, increase surface runoff, and impact surface water quality. Soil conservation practices aim to protect soils from erosion and can restore soil physical and hydrological properties; however, their effect on restoring hydrological conditions at the field level is unknown. An agricultural experimental setup was established in 2020 in Saint-Lambert-de-Lauzon (near Quebec City, Canada) to assess the impact of soil conservation practices and soil compaction on surface runoff and water quality. The field site is composed of twelve 624 m<sup>2</sup> experimental plots in which the following are monitored: surface runoff and tile drainage, water quality (suspended solids, total phosphorus, nitrate and nitrite, dissolved metals), soil physical and chemical properties, and crop yields. The experimental design allows the comparison of four agricultural treatments: two compaction treatments (with and without soil compaction) and two conservation treatments (conventional and soil conservation agricultural practices). Each treatment is replicated three times. After a 3-year rotation cycle, analyses of monitored variables using Generalised Additive Mixed Models (GAMM) confirmed moderate but significant short-term capacity of soil conservation practices to reduce loads of suspended solids and nitrate and nitrite. Loads of total phosphorus were, however, not reduced significantly. Moreover, soil conservation practices were related to an unexpected increase in surface runoff during the spring flood. No effect was observed on soil properties and crop yields. An innovative methodological framework was explored to assess the long-term impacts of soil conservation practices on hydrology. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool model was set up and calibrated for each experimental plot to simulate water budgets and was run using restored soil physical conditions based on measurements conducted on surrounding unperturbed sites. Despite limitations in flow partitioning, simulations suggested that a restoration of soil physical properties could moderately reduce surface runoff at the plot scale in the long term. The study enhances understanding of local soil health, quantitative hydrology, and water quality processes, and demonstrates the potential of a new methodological framework to quantify the long-term benefits of soil conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil compaction and degraded soil structure can decrease water infiltration, increase surface runoff, and impact surface water quality. Soil conservation practices aim to protect soils from erosion and can restore soil physical and hydrological properties; however, their effect on restoring hydrological conditions at the field level is unknown. An agricultural experimental setup was established in 2020 in Saint-Lambert-de-Lauzon (near Quebec City, Canada) to assess the impact of soil conservation practices and soil compaction on surface runoff and water quality. The field site is composed of twelve 624 m2 experimental plots in which the following are monitored: surface runoff and tile drainage, water quality (suspended solids, total phosphorus, nitrate and nitrite, dissolved metals), soil physical and chemical properties, and crop yields. The experimental design allows the comparison of four agricultural treatments: two compaction treatments (with and without soil compaction) and two conservation treatments (conventional and soil conservation agricultural practices). Each treatment is replicated three times. After a 3-year rotation cycle, analyses of monitored variables using Generalised Additive Mixed Models (GAMM) confirmed moderate but significant short-term capacity of soil conservation practices to reduce loads of suspended solids and nitrate and nitrite. Loads of total phosphorus were, however, not reduced significantly. Moreover, soil conservation practices were related to an unexpected increase in surface runoff during the spring flood. No effect was observed on soil properties and crop yields. An innovative methodological framework was explored to assess the long-term impacts of soil conservation practices on hydrology. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool model was set up and calibrated for each experimental plot to simulate water budgets and was run using restored soil physical conditions based on measurements conducted on surrounding unperturbed sites. Despite limitations in flow partitioning, simulations suggested that a restoration of soil physical properties could moderately reduce surface runoff at the plot scale in the long term. The study enhances understanding of local soil health, quantitative hydrology, and water quality processes, and demonstrates the potential of a new methodological framework to quantify the long-term benefits of soil conservation.

Abstract Image

利用农业试验设置、广义加成混合模型和水文模型评估土壤保持措施对地表径流和水质的影响
土壤压实和土壤结构退化会减少水分入渗,增加地表径流,影响地表水质量。土壤保持措施旨在保护土壤免受侵蚀,并能恢复土壤的物理和水文特性;然而,它们对恢复野外水文条件的影响尚不清楚。2020年,在加拿大魁北克市附近的Saint-Lambert-de-Lauzon建立了一个农业试验装置,以评估土壤保持措施和土壤压实对地表径流和水质的影响。现场由12个624平方米的试验田组成,其中监测了以下内容:地表径流和排水,水质(悬浮物,总磷,硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐,溶解金属),土壤物理和化学性质以及作物产量。实验设计允许比较四种农业处理:两种压实处理(有和没有土壤压实)和两种保持处理(传统和土壤保持农业做法)。每个处理重复三次。经过3年的轮作周期,使用广义加性混合模型(GAMM)对监测变量进行分析,证实土壤保持措施在减少悬浮固体、硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐负荷方面具有中等但显著的短期能力。然而,总磷负荷并没有显著减少。此外,土壤保持措施与春季洪水期间地表径流的意外增加有关。未观察到对土壤性质和作物产量的影响。探索了一种创新的方法框架来评估水土保持措施对水文的长期影响。建立了土壤和水分评估工具模型,并对每个试验地块进行了校准,以模拟水分收支,并根据周围未受扰动场地的测量结果,使用恢复的土壤物理条件运行。尽管在流量分配方面存在局限性,但模拟表明,土壤物理性质的恢复可以在长期内适度减少地块尺度上的地表径流。该研究增强了对当地土壤健康、定量水文学和水质过程的理解,并展示了一种新的方法框架的潜力,可以量化土壤保持的长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信