A network cross-cultural validation of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians

Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago , Alyssa Sawyer , Joanne Hedges , Michael Sawyer , Lisa Jamieson
{"title":"A network cross-cultural validation of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians","authors":"Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago ,&nbsp;Alyssa Sawyer ,&nbsp;Joanne Hedges ,&nbsp;Michael Sawyer ,&nbsp;Lisa Jamieson","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) is the most used instrument worldwide to measure parenting sense of competence. Considering that cultural differences influence parenting practices, an investigation of cross-cultural validity was required to ensure that PSOC scores can be compared between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. To address this research gap, this study employed network psychometrics to investigate the cross-cultural validity of the PSOC between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study investigated the network psychometric properties of the PSOC instrument, specifically: (1) model estimation; (2) item redundancy; (3) dimensionality; (4) measurement invariance; (5) model fit; (6) criterion validity; and (7) reliability. The network model that was used was the Gaussian graphical model estimated with the graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Dimensionality was evaluated with exploratory graph analysis. Measurement invariance was evaluated via permutation testing. Data were from the South Australian Aboriginal Birth Cohort (n=178) and eMums study (n=107).</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The findings indicated that, after accounting for item redundancy, a revised 14-item version of the PSOC displayed the two theoretical dimensions of Efficacy and Satisfaction and was cross-culturally valid among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The revised 14-item PSOC displayed excellent psychometric properties and is readily available to be used in Australia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949840625000166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) is the most used instrument worldwide to measure parenting sense of competence. Considering that cultural differences influence parenting practices, an investigation of cross-cultural validity was required to ensure that PSOC scores can be compared between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. To address this research gap, this study employed network psychometrics to investigate the cross-cultural validity of the PSOC between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.

Methods

The study investigated the network psychometric properties of the PSOC instrument, specifically: (1) model estimation; (2) item redundancy; (3) dimensionality; (4) measurement invariance; (5) model fit; (6) criterion validity; and (7) reliability. The network model that was used was the Gaussian graphical model estimated with the graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Dimensionality was evaluated with exploratory graph analysis. Measurement invariance was evaluated via permutation testing. Data were from the South Australian Aboriginal Birth Cohort (n=178) and eMums study (n=107).

Main findings

The findings indicated that, after accounting for item redundancy, a revised 14-item version of the PSOC displayed the two theoretical dimensions of Efficacy and Satisfaction and was cross-culturally valid among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians.

Principal conclusions

The revised 14-item PSOC displayed excellent psychometric properties and is readily available to be used in Australia.
澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民与非土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民之间育儿能力感量表的网络跨文化验证
目的父母能力感量表(PSOC)是目前国际上应用最广泛的父母能力感测评工具。考虑到文化差异对养育方式的影响,需要进行跨文化效度调查,以确保澳大利亚土著和托雷斯海峡岛民与非土著和托雷斯海峡岛民之间的PSOC分数可以进行比较。为了弥补这一研究空白,本研究采用网络心理测量学来调查澳大利亚土著和托雷斯海峡岛民与非土著和托雷斯海峡岛民之间PSOC的跨文化效度。方法对PSOC仪器的网络心理测量特性进行研究,具体如下:(1)模型估计;(2)项目冗余;(3)维度;(4)测量不变性;(5)模型拟合;(6)效度;(7)可靠性。所使用的网络模型是用图形最小绝对收缩和选择算子估计的高斯图形模型。用探索性图分析评估维度。通过排列检验评估测量不变性。数据来自南澳大利亚原住民出生队列(n=178)和eMums研究(n=107)。主要研究结果表明,在考虑项目冗余后,修订后的14个项目版本的PSOC显示了效能和满意度两个理论维度,并且在土著和非土著澳大利亚人中具有跨文化有效性。主要结论:修订后的14项PSOC具有良好的心理测量性能,可以在澳大利亚使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信