Cristian Domarchi , Elisabetta Cherchi , Quoc C. Vuong
{"title":"Cognitive consistency and preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: A latent class model","authors":"Cristian Domarchi , Elisabetta Cherchi , Quoc C. Vuong","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-term decisions, such as electric vehicle purchases, typically involve assessing complex interactions among several cognitive components. These psychological constructs are often a source of heterogeneity in the preferences for instrumental attributes. In this paper, we analyse vehicle fuel type choices using a latent class-discrete choice model where attitudinal and emotional appraisals of the electric vehicle purchase decision influence both class membership and preferences within each class. The model is estimated using data from a stated choice experiment and an attitudinal questionnaire. Attitudinal and emotional outputs come from the hot coherence (HOTCO) model, where motivation and behavioural response interact with each other to produce a consistent assessment. Our results reveal three distinct user segments in the sample – potential innovators, laggards, and sceptics, with markedly different purchase motives, preference parameters, and decision-making profiles. The HOTCO attributes help identifying the cognitive aspects that shape decision-making which is beneficial for effective policy design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104729"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925001397","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Long-term decisions, such as electric vehicle purchases, typically involve assessing complex interactions among several cognitive components. These psychological constructs are often a source of heterogeneity in the preferences for instrumental attributes. In this paper, we analyse vehicle fuel type choices using a latent class-discrete choice model where attitudinal and emotional appraisals of the electric vehicle purchase decision influence both class membership and preferences within each class. The model is estimated using data from a stated choice experiment and an attitudinal questionnaire. Attitudinal and emotional outputs come from the hot coherence (HOTCO) model, where motivation and behavioural response interact with each other to produce a consistent assessment. Our results reveal three distinct user segments in the sample – potential innovators, laggards, and sceptics, with markedly different purchase motives, preference parameters, and decision-making profiles. The HOTCO attributes help identifying the cognitive aspects that shape decision-making which is beneficial for effective policy design.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.