Local stakeholder's perspectives on development of economic activities: The Gällivare case

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jerbelle Elomina , Ivana Živojinović , Gun Lidestav , Per Sandström , Stefan Sandström , Helga Pülzl
{"title":"Local stakeholder's perspectives on development of economic activities: The Gällivare case","authors":"Jerbelle Elomina ,&nbsp;Ivana Živojinović ,&nbsp;Gun Lidestav ,&nbsp;Per Sandström ,&nbsp;Stefan Sandström ,&nbsp;Helga Pülzl","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sweden's commitment to environmental conservation, social equity, and cultural preservation is challenged by intensifying resource extraction and land use conflicts. To ensure its continued equitable development, understanding and incorporating local perspectives into the decision-making process is necessary. Hence, this study seeks to understand current stakeholder views on the development of extractive industries i.e., mining and forestry; and traditional livelihood focusing on reindeer husbandry as defined by the human development theory and subjective capabilities. We used Gällivare, Sweden as our case study where all these economic activities are present and land use conflicts are intensifying. Through expert interviews and local stakeholder surveys using Q-methodology, we identified three perspectives: (1) Uncertain Development, (2) Prioritizing Nature and Reindeer, and (3) Industry Growth Equals Community Growth. We also found points of consensus and conflicts among these differing perspectives crucial for improving ongoing discussions and negotiations on land use conflicts. What remains clear is that development remains contested. Some groups express limited capabilities and freedom in pursuing the life they value hence development for some stakeholders is still far from reality as against reported indexes. Finally, we suggest that examining local stakeholder views on development can enhance the current monitoring of human development, especially in the Arctic region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2500053X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sweden's commitment to environmental conservation, social equity, and cultural preservation is challenged by intensifying resource extraction and land use conflicts. To ensure its continued equitable development, understanding and incorporating local perspectives into the decision-making process is necessary. Hence, this study seeks to understand current stakeholder views on the development of extractive industries i.e., mining and forestry; and traditional livelihood focusing on reindeer husbandry as defined by the human development theory and subjective capabilities. We used Gällivare, Sweden as our case study where all these economic activities are present and land use conflicts are intensifying. Through expert interviews and local stakeholder surveys using Q-methodology, we identified three perspectives: (1) Uncertain Development, (2) Prioritizing Nature and Reindeer, and (3) Industry Growth Equals Community Growth. We also found points of consensus and conflicts among these differing perspectives crucial for improving ongoing discussions and negotiations on land use conflicts. What remains clear is that development remains contested. Some groups express limited capabilities and freedom in pursuing the life they value hence development for some stakeholders is still far from reality as against reported indexes. Finally, we suggest that examining local stakeholder views on development can enhance the current monitoring of human development, especially in the Arctic region.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信