Characterization of preferential flow and transport pathways under farmland with different land uses

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Jiamin Ge , Dongli She , Xinni Ju , Taohong Cao , Yongqiu Xia
{"title":"Characterization of preferential flow and transport pathways under farmland with different land uses","authors":"Jiamin Ge ,&nbsp;Dongli She ,&nbsp;Xinni Ju ,&nbsp;Taohong Cao ,&nbsp;Yongqiu Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Groundwater contamination in agriculturally intensive utilization areas is serious and widespread. Understanding the leaching of pollutants into groundwater is necessary, particularly the roles of preferential flow with macropores and solute transport in agricultural landscapes. However, limited studies focus on the quantitative effect of preferential flow on soil water and pollutants transport under different land uses in in-situ fields. This study quantified the process and paths of soil water and solute transport. This work also evaluated the impacts of three land uses (rice–wheat rotation (RW), vegetable (VG), and pear orchard (PO) fields) on the displacement of sodium bromide (Br<sup>−</sup>) and brilliant blue on a profile scale combined with field infiltration experiments. Results showed that in RW, VG, and PO fields, the stained area ratio decreased by 81.8 %, 82.6 %, and 86.7 % within 0–30 cm, respectively. Across the entire soil profile (0–100 cm), the majority of stained path width ratio concentrated at &lt; 1 cm, accounting for 53.8 %, 62.0 %, and 56.7 % in the RW, VG, and PO fields. In 0–20 cm soil layers, the proportion of stained path width ratio ranging from 1–8 cm relative to the entire profile was higher in RW and VG fields (51.2 % and 54.0 %, respectively) compared to the PO field (38.1 %). Moreover, the high macroporosity corresponds to the low stained area ratio. Further analysis revealed that water flow in the surface layers of all three land uses was primarily matrix flow. In contrast, macropore flow, predominantly mixed with low interaction, dominated in the subsurface layers (below 30 cm). Macropores were the main influencing factor of preferential flow. The mean residual concentration of Br<sup>−</sup> ion in the profile followed the pattern RW (0.11∙10<sup>–3</sup> mol L<sup>–1</sup>) &gt; PO (0<sup>.</sup>08∙10<sup>–3</sup> mol L<sup>–1</sup>) &gt; VG (0.04∙10<sup>–3</sup> mol L<sup>–1</sup>). The RW field exhibited a deeper infiltration depth and faster movement speed. Consequently, the RW field with the characteristics of drying–wetting exhibited a more pronounced preferential flow than VG and PO in the profile, especially below the root zone (&gt; 40 cm). This study provides valuable insights into the migration pathways of nonpoint source and groundwater pollution in plain river network areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 106573"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725001278","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater contamination in agriculturally intensive utilization areas is serious and widespread. Understanding the leaching of pollutants into groundwater is necessary, particularly the roles of preferential flow with macropores and solute transport in agricultural landscapes. However, limited studies focus on the quantitative effect of preferential flow on soil water and pollutants transport under different land uses in in-situ fields. This study quantified the process and paths of soil water and solute transport. This work also evaluated the impacts of three land uses (rice–wheat rotation (RW), vegetable (VG), and pear orchard (PO) fields) on the displacement of sodium bromide (Br) and brilliant blue on a profile scale combined with field infiltration experiments. Results showed that in RW, VG, and PO fields, the stained area ratio decreased by 81.8 %, 82.6 %, and 86.7 % within 0–30 cm, respectively. Across the entire soil profile (0–100 cm), the majority of stained path width ratio concentrated at < 1 cm, accounting for 53.8 %, 62.0 %, and 56.7 % in the RW, VG, and PO fields. In 0–20 cm soil layers, the proportion of stained path width ratio ranging from 1–8 cm relative to the entire profile was higher in RW and VG fields (51.2 % and 54.0 %, respectively) compared to the PO field (38.1 %). Moreover, the high macroporosity corresponds to the low stained area ratio. Further analysis revealed that water flow in the surface layers of all three land uses was primarily matrix flow. In contrast, macropore flow, predominantly mixed with low interaction, dominated in the subsurface layers (below 30 cm). Macropores were the main influencing factor of preferential flow. The mean residual concentration of Br ion in the profile followed the pattern RW (0.11∙10–3 mol L–1) > PO (0.08∙10–3 mol L–1) > VG (0.04∙10–3 mol L–1). The RW field exhibited a deeper infiltration depth and faster movement speed. Consequently, the RW field with the characteristics of drying–wetting exhibited a more pronounced preferential flow than VG and PO in the profile, especially below the root zone (> 40 cm). This study provides valuable insights into the migration pathways of nonpoint source and groundwater pollution in plain river network areas.
不同土地利用方式下农田优先流动和运输路径特征
农业集约利用地区地下水污染严重而普遍。了解污染物进入地下水的淋滤是必要的,特别是在农业景观中具有大孔隙的优先流和溶质运输的作用。然而,对不同土地利用方式下的优先流对原田土壤水分和污染物运移的定量影响研究较少。本研究量化了土壤水分和溶质运移的过程和途径。本研究还在剖面尺度上结合田间入渗试验,评估了三种土地利用方式(稻麦轮作、菜田和梨园)对溴化钠(Br−)和亮蓝位移的影响。结果表明,在RW、VG和PO领域,0 ~ 30 cm范围内,染色面积率分别下降81.8 %、82.6 %和86.7 %。在整个土壤剖面(0-100 cm)上,大部分染色径宽比集中在<; 1 cm处,在RW、VG和PO区分别占53.8% %、62.0 %和56.7% %。在0 ~ 20 cm土层中,RW和VG田中1 ~ 8 cm的路径宽度比值占整个剖面的比例(分别为51.2% %和54.0% %)高于PO田中(38.1 %)。高孔隙度对应着低染色面积比。进一步分析表明,三种土地利用的表层水流主要为基质流。相比之下,大孔隙流主要分布在地下层(30 cm以下),以低相互作用为主。大孔隙是优先流动的主要影响因素。剖面中Br−离子的平均残留浓度为RW(0.11∙10-3 mol L-1) >; PO(0.08∙10-3 mol L-1) >; VG(0.04∙10-3 mol L-1)。RW场的入渗深度更深,移动速度更快。因此,具有干湿特征的RW场在剖面上表现出比VG和PO更明显的优先流动,特别是在根区以下(>; 40厘米)。该研究对平原河网地区非点源污染和地下水污染的迁移路径提供了有价值的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信