Exploring digital health tools for depression management in primary health care: Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aïna Fuster-Casanovas , Sonia Moretó Melero , Daniela Cabutto , Carme Carrion , Josep Vidal-Alaball , Estefania Herrera-Ramos , Carles Barcons , Andrea Duarte-Díaz
{"title":"Exploring digital health tools for depression management in primary health care: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Aïna Fuster-Casanovas ,&nbsp;Sonia Moretó Melero ,&nbsp;Daniela Cabutto ,&nbsp;Carme Carrion ,&nbsp;Josep Vidal-Alaball ,&nbsp;Estefania Herrera-Ramos ,&nbsp;Carles Barcons ,&nbsp;Andrea Duarte-Díaz","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Digital health tools are transforming mental health care, particularly in treating depression, which affects 5 % of the global population and is projected to be the top disease burden by 2030. In primary care, these tools improve accessibility and efficacy, addressing rising mental health demands, especially post-COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of digital health tools for the management of depression within primary care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, focusing on digital health tools for reducing depressive symptoms. Controlled trials were included, with RCTs assessed via the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and non-RCTs evaluated using the JBI checklist for quasi-experimental studies. Depressive symptom reduction was the primary outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 29 controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, identifying were web-based platforms, mobile apps, phone calls, text messages, and decision algorithms. The meta-analysis revealed that digital health tools had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (<em>g</em> = −0.22, 95 % CI: −0.37; −0.06, I<sup>2</sup> = 79.64 %). At 6 to 12-month follow-up, the random effects meta-analysis showed that digital health tools had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (<em>g</em> = −0.19, 95%CI: −0.29; −0.09, I<sup>2</sup> = 53.42 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Digital health tools are effective in reducing the symptoms of repression. Symptom severity does not predict suitability for digital treatment, emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive approaches and strategies for older adults. Integrating digital interventions into clinical guidelines requires studies like this to support their adoption in real-world practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"381 ","pages":"Pages 494-506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725005373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Digital health tools are transforming mental health care, particularly in treating depression, which affects 5 % of the global population and is projected to be the top disease burden by 2030. In primary care, these tools improve accessibility and efficacy, addressing rising mental health demands, especially post-COVID-19.

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of digital health tools for the management of depression within primary care.

Methods

A systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, focusing on digital health tools for reducing depressive symptoms. Controlled trials were included, with RCTs assessed via the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and non-RCTs evaluated using the JBI checklist for quasi-experimental studies. Depressive symptom reduction was the primary outcome.

Results

A total of 29 controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, identifying were web-based platforms, mobile apps, phone calls, text messages, and decision algorithms. The meta-analysis revealed that digital health tools had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (g = −0.22, 95 % CI: −0.37; −0.06, I2 = 79.64 %). At 6 to 12-month follow-up, the random effects meta-analysis showed that digital health tools had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (g = −0.19, 95%CI: −0.29; −0.09, I2 = 53.42 %).

Conclusions

Digital health tools are effective in reducing the symptoms of repression. Symptom severity does not predict suitability for digital treatment, emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive approaches and strategies for older adults. Integrating digital interventions into clinical guidelines requires studies like this to support their adoption in real-world practice.
探索用于初级医疗保健中抑郁症管理的数字健康工具:系统回顾和荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信