Mohammad Sadrani , Filippos Adamidis , Laurie A. Garrow , Constantinos Antoniou
{"title":"Challenges in urban air mobility implementation: A comparative analysis of barriers in Germany and the United States","authors":"Mohammad Sadrani , Filippos Adamidis , Laurie A. Garrow , Constantinos Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is a transport system enabling the movement of people and goods within urban areas using electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. Nonetheless, this concept remains an emerging technology with various challenges that can hinder its implementation. This research introduces a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework to prioritize barriers to UAM implementation in Germany and the USA. We identify 26 barriers across technological, economic, social, environmental, and operational aspects through a comprehensive literature review and expert interviews. Using the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM), we determine the weight of each barrier based on input from industry and academic experts in Germany and the USA. Our findings reveal that economic aspects pose the greatest challenge in Germany, followed by social, operational, technological, and environmental aspects. In the USA, operational aspects are the most significant, followed by technological, economic, social, and environmental aspects. The operational aspect shows the largest difference between the two countries, while the environmental aspect shows the least. Globally, the top three barriers in Germany are price affordability, investment uncertainty, and user acceptance concerns. In the USA, the top three barriers are airspace utilization challenges, remote/autonomous operations, and system safety and cybersecurity issues, which rank tenth, twelfth, and sixteenth, respectively, in Germany. We also discuss the potential implications of our findings, offering strategies to effectively address high-priority barriers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 102780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699725000432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is a transport system enabling the movement of people and goods within urban areas using electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. Nonetheless, this concept remains an emerging technology with various challenges that can hinder its implementation. This research introduces a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework to prioritize barriers to UAM implementation in Germany and the USA. We identify 26 barriers across technological, economic, social, environmental, and operational aspects through a comprehensive literature review and expert interviews. Using the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM), we determine the weight of each barrier based on input from industry and academic experts in Germany and the USA. Our findings reveal that economic aspects pose the greatest challenge in Germany, followed by social, operational, technological, and environmental aspects. In the USA, operational aspects are the most significant, followed by technological, economic, social, and environmental aspects. The operational aspect shows the largest difference between the two countries, while the environmental aspect shows the least. Globally, the top three barriers in Germany are price affordability, investment uncertainty, and user acceptance concerns. In the USA, the top three barriers are airspace utilization challenges, remote/autonomous operations, and system safety and cybersecurity issues, which rank tenth, twelfth, and sixteenth, respectively, in Germany. We also discuss the potential implications of our findings, offering strategies to effectively address high-priority barriers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability