Sami Ul Rehman , Sania Fayyaz , Muhammad Usman , Mehreen Saleem , Umer Farooq , Asjad Amin , Mushtaq Hussain Lashari , Musadiq Idris , Haroon Rashid , Maryam Chaudhary
{"title":"Machine learning-based detection and quantification of red blood cells in Cholistani cattle: A pilot study","authors":"Sami Ul Rehman , Sania Fayyaz , Muhammad Usman , Mehreen Saleem , Umer Farooq , Asjad Amin , Mushtaq Hussain Lashari , Musadiq Idris , Haroon Rashid , Maryam Chaudhary","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents the first account of using machine learning to detect and count normal and abnormal red blood cells (RBCs), including tear-drop cells and schistocytes, in Cholistani cattle from Pakistan. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) model was applied and compared with manual counting methods. Pre-annotated blood smear images were preprocessed using contrast stretching transformation, followed by segmentation and resizing. Labeled datasets were augmented, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed for feature reduction. The dataset was randomly split into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, and the SVM model was trained and evaluated accordingly. No statistically significant difference (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.05) was observed between manual and machine learning-based RBC counts for all the studied cell types. The highest classification probability was recorded for normal RBCs (87 %), followed by tear-drop cells (84 %) and schistocytes (73 %). Accuracy was highest for tear-drop cells (0.991), followed by normal RBCs (0.965) and schistocytes (0.707). Precision values followed a similar trend, with the highest for normal RBCs (0.932), followed by tear-drop cells (0.921) and schistocytes (0.855). These findings suggest that machine learning, particularly SVM-based models, can accurately and precisely detect and count normal RBCs and tear-drop cells in Cholistani cattle. However, further refinements are needed to improve RBC detection using convolution neural networks or other deep learning approaches. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence for hematological assessments in veterinary medicine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 105650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents the first account of using machine learning to detect and count normal and abnormal red blood cells (RBCs), including tear-drop cells and schistocytes, in Cholistani cattle from Pakistan. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) model was applied and compared with manual counting methods. Pre-annotated blood smear images were preprocessed using contrast stretching transformation, followed by segmentation and resizing. Labeled datasets were augmented, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed for feature reduction. The dataset was randomly split into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, and the SVM model was trained and evaluated accordingly. No statistically significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) was observed between manual and machine learning-based RBC counts for all the studied cell types. The highest classification probability was recorded for normal RBCs (87 %), followed by tear-drop cells (84 %) and schistocytes (73 %). Accuracy was highest for tear-drop cells (0.991), followed by normal RBCs (0.965) and schistocytes (0.707). Precision values followed a similar trend, with the highest for normal RBCs (0.932), followed by tear-drop cells (0.921) and schistocytes (0.855). These findings suggest that machine learning, particularly SVM-based models, can accurately and precisely detect and count normal RBCs and tear-drop cells in Cholistani cattle. However, further refinements are needed to improve RBC detection using convolution neural networks or other deep learning approaches. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence for hematological assessments in veterinary medicine.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.