Clinical Trials Targeting Recovery and Postdischarge Care in Dialysis for Acute Kidney Injury

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ian E. McCoy , Samuel A. Silver
{"title":"Clinical Trials Targeting Recovery and Postdischarge Care in Dialysis for Acute Kidney Injury","authors":"Ian E. McCoy ,&nbsp;Samuel A. Silver","doi":"10.1053/j.akdh.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Receipt of dialysis for acute kidney injury is common and increasing. For patients still actively receiving dialysis, it is possible that the dialysis procedure itself decreases the likelihood of kidney recovery or confounds recognition that recovery has occurred. Accordingly, 2 ongoing trials are testing hypotheses that dialysis prescriptions to minimize dialysis-induced ischemia and/or standardize dialysis discontinuation will increase the likelihood of renal recovery compared to usual care. These will be some of the first clinical trials to focus on hospitalized patients during the recovery phase of their acute illness. Meanwhile, clinical trials in the postdischarge population have found that less than 30% of patients choose to enroll when interventions require in-person nephrology follow-up, suggesting more flexible and pragmatic follow-up pathways are needed. Key considerations for future trials in dialysis for acute kidney injury will include recruiting patients at the right time in their clinical course during the window between acute kidney injury development and recovery or death, as well as providing interventions/follow-up over great distances and in multiple care settings. Testing different care strategies in this rigorous manner may eventually help reduce variation in care across centers and identify evidence-based practices that promote kidney recovery in dialysis for acute kidney injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72096,"journal":{"name":"Advances in kidney disease and health","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 194-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in kidney disease and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949813925000084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Receipt of dialysis for acute kidney injury is common and increasing. For patients still actively receiving dialysis, it is possible that the dialysis procedure itself decreases the likelihood of kidney recovery or confounds recognition that recovery has occurred. Accordingly, 2 ongoing trials are testing hypotheses that dialysis prescriptions to minimize dialysis-induced ischemia and/or standardize dialysis discontinuation will increase the likelihood of renal recovery compared to usual care. These will be some of the first clinical trials to focus on hospitalized patients during the recovery phase of their acute illness. Meanwhile, clinical trials in the postdischarge population have found that less than 30% of patients choose to enroll when interventions require in-person nephrology follow-up, suggesting more flexible and pragmatic follow-up pathways are needed. Key considerations for future trials in dialysis for acute kidney injury will include recruiting patients at the right time in their clinical course during the window between acute kidney injury development and recovery or death, as well as providing interventions/follow-up over great distances and in multiple care settings. Testing different care strategies in this rigorous manner may eventually help reduce variation in care across centers and identify evidence-based practices that promote kidney recovery in dialysis for acute kidney injury.
急性肾损伤透析患者康复及出院后护理的临床研究
接受透析治疗急性肾损伤是常见的,而且越来越多。对于仍在积极接受透析的患者,有可能透析本身降低了肾脏恢复的可能性,或者混淆了对已经恢复的认识。因此,两项正在进行的试验正在测试这样的假设:与常规治疗相比,透析处方减少透析引起的缺血和/或使透析中断标准化将增加肾脏恢复的可能性。这将是首批针对急性疾病恢复期住院患者的临床试验。同时,在出院后人群中进行的临床试验发现,当干预措施需要进行现场肾病随访时,只有不到30%的患者选择入组,这表明需要更灵活、更实用的随访途径。未来急性肾损伤透析试验的关键考虑因素将包括在急性肾损伤发生、恢复或死亡之间的临床过程中适当的时间招募患者,以及在远距离和多种护理环境中提供干预/随访。以这种严格的方式测试不同的护理策略可能最终有助于减少各中心护理的差异,并确定促进急性肾损伤透析肾恢复的循证实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信