Models and experiments of normal penetration of polygon cross-section rigid projectiles

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Xudong Gao , Haijun Wu
{"title":"Models and experiments of normal penetration of polygon cross-section rigid projectiles","authors":"Xudong Gao ,&nbsp;Haijun Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We address the normal penetration problem for projectiles having an arc-shaped head and a polygonal cross-section with an axis at the center of the circle inscribed in the polygon. We put forward an analytical model to determine the resistance and depth of rigid normal penetration for this class of projectiles and prove that it shares the mathematical form and the physical implications with models for circular cross-section projectiles, thus providing a unifying model for both types. We also prove that for normal penetration, the lateral force on such polygon cross-section projectiles and the torque around the projectile axis are both zero, thus providing a design methodology for polygon cross-section projectiles without lateral forces and torques. Our analysis indicates that at the fixed cross-sectional area and projectile head length, projectiles having a regular polygonal cross-section with fewer sides show better penetration depth. On the other hand, for projectiles with non-regular polygon cross-section, the smaller is the radius of the inscribed circle, the better is the penetration depth. We validate our theoretical results with experiments of normal penetration on concrete mortar targets performed using five types of regular polygon cross-section projectiles. The test results confirm that the penetration depth of regular triangular and quadrilateral cross-section projectiles is superior to that of regular pentagonal, hexagonal, and circular cross-section projectiles, with the penetration depth of the latter three being relatively close. Our model provides excellent predictions for the penetration depth of projectiles with (regular) pentagonal, hexagonal, and circular cross-section, while the predictions for regular triangles and quadrilaterals are relatively low. The main reason for this discrepancy is that the model involves a one-dimensional cavity expansion resistance model and does not account for the potential shear damage and weakening effects caused by the edges of the polygonal projectile on the target material.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 105323"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25001046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We address the normal penetration problem for projectiles having an arc-shaped head and a polygonal cross-section with an axis at the center of the circle inscribed in the polygon. We put forward an analytical model to determine the resistance and depth of rigid normal penetration for this class of projectiles and prove that it shares the mathematical form and the physical implications with models for circular cross-section projectiles, thus providing a unifying model for both types. We also prove that for normal penetration, the lateral force on such polygon cross-section projectiles and the torque around the projectile axis are both zero, thus providing a design methodology for polygon cross-section projectiles without lateral forces and torques. Our analysis indicates that at the fixed cross-sectional area and projectile head length, projectiles having a regular polygonal cross-section with fewer sides show better penetration depth. On the other hand, for projectiles with non-regular polygon cross-section, the smaller is the radius of the inscribed circle, the better is the penetration depth. We validate our theoretical results with experiments of normal penetration on concrete mortar targets performed using five types of regular polygon cross-section projectiles. The test results confirm that the penetration depth of regular triangular and quadrilateral cross-section projectiles is superior to that of regular pentagonal, hexagonal, and circular cross-section projectiles, with the penetration depth of the latter three being relatively close. Our model provides excellent predictions for the penetration depth of projectiles with (regular) pentagonal, hexagonal, and circular cross-section, while the predictions for regular triangles and quadrilaterals are relatively low. The main reason for this discrepancy is that the model involves a one-dimensional cavity expansion resistance model and does not account for the potential shear damage and weakening effects caused by the edges of the polygonal projectile on the target material.
多边形截面刚性弹丸法向侵彻模型与试验
我们解决了具有弧形头部和多边形横截面的弹丸的法向侵彻问题,该弹丸的轴线位于多边形内的圆心。我们提出了确定这类弹丸刚性法向侵彻阻力和深度的解析模型,并证明了它与圆截面弹丸模型具有相同的数学形式和物理含义,从而为这两类弹丸提供了一个统一的模型。我们还证明了在法向侵彻时,这种多边形截面弹丸所受的侧向力和绕弹丸轴的扭矩均为零,从而为无侧向力和扭矩的多边形截面弹丸提供了一种设计方法。我们的分析表明,在一定的截面积和弹头长度下,多边形正截面且边长较少的弹体侵彻深度更好。另一方面,对于非正多边形截面的弹丸,内切圆半径越小,侵彻深度越好。用五种正多边形截面弹对混凝土迫击炮目标的法向侵彻试验验证了理论结果。试验结果证实,正三角形和四边形截面弹的侵彻深度优于正五边形、六边形和圆形截面弹,后三者的侵彻深度较为接近。我们的模型对(正)五边形、六边形和圆形截面的弹丸的侵彻深度提供了很好的预测,而对正三角形和四边形的预测相对较低。造成这种差异的主要原因是该模型涉及一维空腔膨胀阻力模型,没有考虑多边形弹丸边缘对靶材可能造成的剪切损伤和削弱效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信