{"title":"Psychometric validation and reliability of the Japanese version of the type 1 diabetes stigma assessment scale (DSAS-1 JP)","authors":"Hiroko Takaike , Asuka Kato , Junnosuke Miura , Satoshi Takagi , Tetsuya Babazono","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.108765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We aimed to develop and validate a Japanese version of the type 1 diabetes (T1D) stigma assessment scale (DSAS-1 JP) to measure the stigma perceived and experienced by adults with T1D.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The DSAS-1 JP was created through forward and backward translations, cognitive debriefing with 10 participants, and extensive proofreading. Its reliability and validity were evaluated in 384 adults with T1D using confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s α for internal reliability, and Spearman’s rank correlation for construct validity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DSAS-1 JP was found to be acceptable by the experts and the target population. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the three-factor structure representing ‘treated differently’, ‘blame and judgement’, and ‘identity concern’, with Cronbach’s α values of 0.86, 0.85, and 0.89, respectively. Overall, Cronbach’s α for the DSAS-1 JP was 0.92. The model fit indices were robust (goodness-of-fit index=0.94, comparative fit index=0.94, root mean square error of approximation=0.068). Correlations of the DSAS-1 JP score with diabetes distress (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), self-esteem (r = -0.28, p < 0.001), and depressive symptoms (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) confirmed its constant validity. The test-retest reliability was strong at 0.77 (p < 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The DSAS-1 JP is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the extent of perceived and experienced stigma in Japanese adults with T1D.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 108765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125001326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
We aimed to develop and validate a Japanese version of the type 1 diabetes (T1D) stigma assessment scale (DSAS-1 JP) to measure the stigma perceived and experienced by adults with T1D.
Methods
The DSAS-1 JP was created through forward and backward translations, cognitive debriefing with 10 participants, and extensive proofreading. Its reliability and validity were evaluated in 384 adults with T1D using confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s α for internal reliability, and Spearman’s rank correlation for construct validity.
Results
The DSAS-1 JP was found to be acceptable by the experts and the target population. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the three-factor structure representing ‘treated differently’, ‘blame and judgement’, and ‘identity concern’, with Cronbach’s α values of 0.86, 0.85, and 0.89, respectively. Overall, Cronbach’s α for the DSAS-1 JP was 0.92. The model fit indices were robust (goodness-of-fit index=0.94, comparative fit index=0.94, root mean square error of approximation=0.068). Correlations of the DSAS-1 JP score with diabetes distress (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), self-esteem (r = -0.28, p < 0.001), and depressive symptoms (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) confirmed its constant validity. The test-retest reliability was strong at 0.77 (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion
The DSAS-1 JP is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the extent of perceived and experienced stigma in Japanese adults with T1D.
期刊介绍:
Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.