Potential effectiveness of extended producer responsibility: An ex-ante policy impact analysis for plastic packaging waste in Belgium, France, and Germany
{"title":"Potential effectiveness of extended producer responsibility: An ex-ante policy impact analysis for plastic packaging waste in Belgium, France, and Germany","authors":"Jakob T. Pruess , Rachael D. Garrett","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a key policy principle to mitigate adverse effects of plastic pollution, holding producers accountable for their products' end-of-life management. Yet, assessment of EPR effectiveness is limited by data quality and causal research design for post-hoc analysis, especially with regard to analyzing country contexts. To grasp EPR's true impact, it is crucial to consider its broader regulatory, socio-economic, and value chain contexts. We introduce a refined ex-ante framework for evaluating potential effectiveness of EPR based on scope, design, and context. To test this approach, we apply the framework to Belgium, France, and Germany and find that all three show high effectiveness, albeit Germany ranks highest. Germany is strong in technology, recycling options and routes, but lacks transparency. Belgium and France grant municipalities greater influence yet face impending cost escalations. Our findings also underscore the need for EU-wide harmonization of several EPR design and implementation criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108297"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a key policy principle to mitigate adverse effects of plastic pollution, holding producers accountable for their products' end-of-life management. Yet, assessment of EPR effectiveness is limited by data quality and causal research design for post-hoc analysis, especially with regard to analyzing country contexts. To grasp EPR's true impact, it is crucial to consider its broader regulatory, socio-economic, and value chain contexts. We introduce a refined ex-ante framework for evaluating potential effectiveness of EPR based on scope, design, and context. To test this approach, we apply the framework to Belgium, France, and Germany and find that all three show high effectiveness, albeit Germany ranks highest. Germany is strong in technology, recycling options and routes, but lacks transparency. Belgium and France grant municipalities greater influence yet face impending cost escalations. Our findings also underscore the need for EU-wide harmonization of several EPR design and implementation criteria.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.