Trends and opportunities in adaptive planning for the built environment: A literature review

IF 3.9 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jin Rui Yap , Orlando Roman , Bryan Tyrone Adey , Tanvi Maheshwari
{"title":"Trends and opportunities in adaptive planning for the built environment: A literature review","authors":"Jin Rui Yap ,&nbsp;Orlando Roman ,&nbsp;Bryan Tyrone Adey ,&nbsp;Tanvi Maheshwari","doi":"10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptive planning supports long-term decision-making under uncertainties, such as those arising from the dynamics of complex systems such as the built environment. This article presents a bibliometric and literature analysis of the adaptive planning paradigm in the context of planning for the built environment. Using the CiteSpace software, a document co-citation analysis of adaptive planning literature was conducted that outlines its temporal and structural evolution. This analysis revealed three distinct disciplines: 1) the Pathways Approaches, arising from climate adaptation, 2) Real Options, arising from financial analysis, and 3) Adaptive Management, arising from the environmental sciences. Subsequently, the literature analysis identified interdisciplinary core elements and recommended best practices for adaptive planning, in addition to frequently discussed challenges and state-of-the-art progress in addressing those challenges. Four emerging challenges that require further exploration were identified, which are: multi-scale considerations, institutional rigidity and uncertainty avoidance, organisational capacity development, and the science-policy gap. By highlighting the parallels across multiple disciplines, this work unifies the different bodies of literature through a synthesis of theoretical insights, clarification of core principles, and identification of barriers and future research directions for adaptive planning in the built environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52395,"journal":{"name":"City and Environment Interactions","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City and Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252025000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adaptive planning supports long-term decision-making under uncertainties, such as those arising from the dynamics of complex systems such as the built environment. This article presents a bibliometric and literature analysis of the adaptive planning paradigm in the context of planning for the built environment. Using the CiteSpace software, a document co-citation analysis of adaptive planning literature was conducted that outlines its temporal and structural evolution. This analysis revealed three distinct disciplines: 1) the Pathways Approaches, arising from climate adaptation, 2) Real Options, arising from financial analysis, and 3) Adaptive Management, arising from the environmental sciences. Subsequently, the literature analysis identified interdisciplinary core elements and recommended best practices for adaptive planning, in addition to frequently discussed challenges and state-of-the-art progress in addressing those challenges. Four emerging challenges that require further exploration were identified, which are: multi-scale considerations, institutional rigidity and uncertainty avoidance, organisational capacity development, and the science-policy gap. By highlighting the parallels across multiple disciplines, this work unifies the different bodies of literature through a synthesis of theoretical insights, clarification of core principles, and identification of barriers and future research directions for adaptive planning in the built environment.
建筑环境适应性规划的趋势和机遇:文献综述
适应性规划支持在不确定性下的长期决策,例如那些由复杂系统(如建筑环境)的动态引起的不确定性。本文对建筑环境规划背景下的适应性规划范式进行了文献计量和文献分析。利用CiteSpace软件,对适应性规划文献进行了共被引分析,概述了其时间和结构演变。这一分析揭示了三个不同的学科:1)路径方法,源于气候适应;2)实物期权,源于金融分析;3)适应性管理,源于环境科学。随后,文献分析确定了跨学科的核心要素,并推荐了适应性规划的最佳实践,此外还经常讨论挑战和解决这些挑战的最新进展。报告确定了需要进一步探索的四个新挑战,它们是:多尺度考虑、制度刚性和不确定性规避、组织能力发展和科学-政策差距。通过强调跨多个学科的相似之处,这项工作通过综合理论见解、澄清核心原则、确定障碍和未来研究方向来统一不同的文献,以适应建筑环境的规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City and Environment Interactions
City and Environment Interactions Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信