Intermediaries that facilitate university–industry research partnerships: A systematic literature review

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jinghong Sun , Xuefeng Liu , Jing Cai
{"title":"Intermediaries that facilitate university–industry research partnerships: A systematic literature review","authors":"Jinghong Sun ,&nbsp;Xuefeng Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on intermediaries facilitating university–industry collaboration (UIC) has grown substantially in recent decades. However, existing reviews predominantly focus on intermediaries supporting commercialization, neglecting those facilitating university–industry research partnerships, another distinct UIC channel that involves deeper interactions and the exchange of tacit knowledge. Given the fragmented state of the relevant literature, we perform a systematic review to provide a coherent understanding of intermediaries in research partnerships. Five types of intermediaries operating at organizational and individual levels emerge through reviewing 69 articles. We contribute by (1) proposing a process model outlining their roles and activities across partnership stages and (2) presenting a framework that discerns partnership development- and partnership participants-related consequences of intermediary involvement and categorizes factors affecting their effectiveness into internal, external, and inter-organizational levels. Based on integrated insights, we formulate a future research agenda in seven areas and discuss practical implications for leveraging intermediaries to catalyze partnership development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 115365"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001882","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on intermediaries facilitating university–industry collaboration (UIC) has grown substantially in recent decades. However, existing reviews predominantly focus on intermediaries supporting commercialization, neglecting those facilitating university–industry research partnerships, another distinct UIC channel that involves deeper interactions and the exchange of tacit knowledge. Given the fragmented state of the relevant literature, we perform a systematic review to provide a coherent understanding of intermediaries in research partnerships. Five types of intermediaries operating at organizational and individual levels emerge through reviewing 69 articles. We contribute by (1) proposing a process model outlining their roles and activities across partnership stages and (2) presenting a framework that discerns partnership development- and partnership participants-related consequences of intermediary involvement and categorizes factors affecting their effectiveness into internal, external, and inter-organizational levels. Based on integrated insights, we formulate a future research agenda in seven areas and discuss practical implications for leveraging intermediaries to catalyze partnership development.
促进大学-产业研究伙伴关系的中介:系统文献综述
近几十年来,对促进校企合作的中介机构的研究有了长足的发展。然而,现有的评论主要集中在支持商业化的中介机构,而忽视了那些促进大学-工业研究伙伴关系的中介机构,这是另一个独特的UIC渠道,涉及更深层次的互动和隐性知识的交换。鉴于相关文献的碎片状态,我们进行了系统的回顾,以提供对研究伙伴关系中的中介的连贯理解。通过对69篇文章的回顾,出现了五种在组织和个人层面运作的中介。我们的贡献是:(1)提出了一个过程模型,概述了他们在伙伴关系各阶段的角色和活动;(2)提出了一个框架,该框架识别了与伙伴关系发展和伙伴关系参与者相关的中介参与后果,并将影响其有效性的因素分为内部、外部和组织间层面。基于综合见解,我们在七个领域制定了未来的研究议程,并讨论了利用中介机构促进伙伴关系发展的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信