{"title":"When thinking you’re good makes you dumber: An investigation of consumers’ earned dogmatism","authors":"Damien Chaney, Magali Trelohan, David Moroz","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While dogmatism has been regarded as a personality trait in consumer research, this study delves into earned dogmatism, specifically dogmatism acquired by consumers through the accumulation of knowledge on a particular subject, leading to closed-minded cognition. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that subjective knowledge correlates with closed-mindedness. The data also indicate that objective knowledge moderates the relationship between subjective knowledge and closed-minded cognition, such that individuals exhibiting the highest degree of closed-mindedness are those with a significant miscalibration of their knowledge, characterized by low objective knowledge and high subjective knowledge. Finally, our findings underscore the paradox in which dogmatic individuals engage in word-of-mouth about a subject despite their closed-mindedness toward it. While previous research has demonstrated that consumer knowledge can have negative consequences for individuals, we suggest that these detrimental effects may also extend to the brands themselves, potentially leading to the dissemination of outdated or misleading information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 115351"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While dogmatism has been regarded as a personality trait in consumer research, this study delves into earned dogmatism, specifically dogmatism acquired by consumers through the accumulation of knowledge on a particular subject, leading to closed-minded cognition. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that subjective knowledge correlates with closed-mindedness. The data also indicate that objective knowledge moderates the relationship between subjective knowledge and closed-minded cognition, such that individuals exhibiting the highest degree of closed-mindedness are those with a significant miscalibration of their knowledge, characterized by low objective knowledge and high subjective knowledge. Finally, our findings underscore the paradox in which dogmatic individuals engage in word-of-mouth about a subject despite their closed-mindedness toward it. While previous research has demonstrated that consumer knowledge can have negative consequences for individuals, we suggest that these detrimental effects may also extend to the brands themselves, potentially leading to the dissemination of outdated or misleading information.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.