Experimental study on natural gas hydrate production under different heat injection well patterns

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Long-Hai Zhang , Yi Wang , Kun Wan , Te Meng , Xiao-Sen Li
{"title":"Experimental study on natural gas hydrate production under different heat injection well patterns","authors":"Long-Hai Zhang ,&nbsp;Yi Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Wan ,&nbsp;Te Meng ,&nbsp;Xiao-Sen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural gas hydrate is an alternative energy source with both reserve advantages and environmental friendliness. Thermal stimulation is a common method for extracting natural gas hydrate, and how to improve the extraction efficiency of natural gas hydrate by optimizing the layout of thermal injection well pattern is a subject worthy of in-depth exploration. This study conducted three sets of hydrate decomposition experiments in a pilot-scale hydrate simulator (PHS) with an effective volume of 117.8 L under different thermal injection well pattern conditions, including single-point heating, two-point heating, and four-point heating. The gas-water production characteristics and heat transfer processes of the three experimental groups were analyzed, and the real-time decomposition rate and energy efficiency ratio of hydrate decomposition under different extraction methods were quantitatively investigated. Experimental results show that under conditions of consistent total heating rate and hydrate saturation, the cumulative gas production of the experiments remained essentially the same, but increasing the density of heat source arrangements shortened the hydrate extraction time. Compared with two-point and single-point heating, four-point heating intensified heat diffusion, but the reservoir temperature gradient in the four-point heating system decreased compared to single-point and two-point modes. Increasing the density of heating points improved heat exchange efficiency, but the dispersed arrangement of heat sources also increased heat losses. The two-point configuration exhibited the highest gas production rate and energy efficiency ratio, followed by four-point, while single-point showed the lowest values. These results may hold implications for optimizing thermal injection well patterns in trial production projects and future commercial exploitation of natural gas hydrates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"390 ","pages":"Article 125870"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925006002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural gas hydrate is an alternative energy source with both reserve advantages and environmental friendliness. Thermal stimulation is a common method for extracting natural gas hydrate, and how to improve the extraction efficiency of natural gas hydrate by optimizing the layout of thermal injection well pattern is a subject worthy of in-depth exploration. This study conducted three sets of hydrate decomposition experiments in a pilot-scale hydrate simulator (PHS) with an effective volume of 117.8 L under different thermal injection well pattern conditions, including single-point heating, two-point heating, and four-point heating. The gas-water production characteristics and heat transfer processes of the three experimental groups were analyzed, and the real-time decomposition rate and energy efficiency ratio of hydrate decomposition under different extraction methods were quantitatively investigated. Experimental results show that under conditions of consistent total heating rate and hydrate saturation, the cumulative gas production of the experiments remained essentially the same, but increasing the density of heat source arrangements shortened the hydrate extraction time. Compared with two-point and single-point heating, four-point heating intensified heat diffusion, but the reservoir temperature gradient in the four-point heating system decreased compared to single-point and two-point modes. Increasing the density of heating points improved heat exchange efficiency, but the dispersed arrangement of heat sources also increased heat losses. The two-point configuration exhibited the highest gas production rate and energy efficiency ratio, followed by four-point, while single-point showed the lowest values. These results may hold implications for optimizing thermal injection well patterns in trial production projects and future commercial exploitation of natural gas hydrates.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信