Jens Blotevogel, Justin P. Joyce, Olivia L. Hill and Anthony K. Rappé*,
{"title":"Headgroup Dependence and Kinetic Bottlenecks of Gas-Phase Thermal PFAS Destruction","authors":"Jens Blotevogel, Justin P. Joyce, Olivia L. Hill and Anthony K. Rappé*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsestengg.4c0072610.1021/acsestengg.4c00726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Recent studies of thermal PFAS destruction have reported seemingly incoherent temperatures and products, often because decomposition pathways are highly dependent on the respective experimental system. Here, we applied highly accurate DLPNO–CCSD(T) coupled cluster calculations to isolate and identify the major processes during thermal PFAS destruction in the gas phase, with relevance to incineration, thermal oxidation, and other thermal treatment technologies in which PFAS and their volatile decomposition products desorb into the gas phase. All investigated perfluoroalkyl acids decompose via unimolecular headgroup loss, either through HF elimination or homolytic bond cleavage as a function of headgroup type. In contrast, all investigated fluorotelomers undergo initial hydrogen abstraction from the characteristic C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> moiety by hydroxyl radicals under representative incineration conditions, followed by radical decomposition. Subsequent formation of perfluoroalkanes, including CF<sub>4</sub>, can then be prevented by supplying sufficient hydrogen donors such as hydrocarbon fuel and water as well as by scavenging released fluorine. This leads to the generation of stable 1<i>H</i>-perfluoroalkanes. While parent PFAS decomposition proceeds at gas-phase temperatures ≤700 °C, carbon–carbon cleavage of 1<i>H</i>-perfluoroalkanes requires up to ∼950 °C at 2 s gas residence time, making this step the kinetic bottleneck on the way to complete thermal PFAS mineralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7008,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T engineering","volume":"5 4","pages":"910–921 910–921"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestengg.4c00726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent studies of thermal PFAS destruction have reported seemingly incoherent temperatures and products, often because decomposition pathways are highly dependent on the respective experimental system. Here, we applied highly accurate DLPNO–CCSD(T) coupled cluster calculations to isolate and identify the major processes during thermal PFAS destruction in the gas phase, with relevance to incineration, thermal oxidation, and other thermal treatment technologies in which PFAS and their volatile decomposition products desorb into the gas phase. All investigated perfluoroalkyl acids decompose via unimolecular headgroup loss, either through HF elimination or homolytic bond cleavage as a function of headgroup type. In contrast, all investigated fluorotelomers undergo initial hydrogen abstraction from the characteristic C2H4 moiety by hydroxyl radicals under representative incineration conditions, followed by radical decomposition. Subsequent formation of perfluoroalkanes, including CF4, can then be prevented by supplying sufficient hydrogen donors such as hydrocarbon fuel and water as well as by scavenging released fluorine. This leads to the generation of stable 1H-perfluoroalkanes. While parent PFAS decomposition proceeds at gas-phase temperatures ≤700 °C, carbon–carbon cleavage of 1H-perfluoroalkanes requires up to ∼950 °C at 2 s gas residence time, making this step the kinetic bottleneck on the way to complete thermal PFAS mineralization.
期刊介绍:
ACS ES&T Engineering publishes impactful research and review articles across all realms of environmental technology and engineering, employing a rigorous peer-review process. As a specialized journal, it aims to provide an international platform for research and innovation, inviting contributions on materials technologies, processes, data analytics, and engineering systems that can effectively manage, protect, and remediate air, water, and soil quality, as well as treat wastes and recover resources.
The journal encourages research that supports informed decision-making within complex engineered systems and is grounded in mechanistic science and analytics, describing intricate environmental engineering systems. It considers papers presenting novel advancements, spanning from laboratory discovery to field-based application. However, case or demonstration studies lacking significant scientific advancements and technological innovations are not within its scope.
Contributions containing experimental and/or theoretical methods, rooted in engineering principles and integrated with knowledge from other disciplines, are welcomed.