Shared mobility choices in metro connectivity: shared bikes versus shared e-bikes

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yang Liu, Rui Tang, Zhuangbin Shi, Mingwei He, Long Cheng
{"title":"Shared mobility choices in metro connectivity: shared bikes versus shared e-bikes","authors":"Yang Liu, Rui Tang, Zhuangbin Shi, Mingwei He, Long Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10612-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concurrent availability of shared bikes (DBS) and emerging shared e-bikes (EBS) systems offers new opportunities for sustainable urban mobility, particularly in enhancing first/last-mile connectivity with metro systems. However, a significant gap exists in understanding user choice behavior between DBS and EBS for metro connectivity. As shared micromobility options, DBS and EBS exhibit more competitive and complementary relationships compared to other transport modes when integrated with metro services. This study aims to bridge this gap by exploring the factors that influence the choice of DBS and EBS as metro connection modes. Taking Kunming—a Chinese city where both modes coexist—as a case study, the study identifies DBS and EBS trips connecting to the metro using operational data analyzed through the K-dimensional tree method (KDTree) along with Kernel Density Estimation analysis (KDE) methods. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model analyzes nonlinear effects in both to-metro and from-metro scenarios across four aspects: socioeconomic attributes, travel characteristics, the built environment, and transportation facilities. The results indicate that transportation facilities and the built environment significantly influence DBS and EBS user choices for metro connections, with notable nonlinear effects. For instance, cycling distance significantly influences mode choices. Initially, the probability of selecting EBS increases with cycling distance, then stabilizes. The likelihood of choosing EBS initially decreases and then increases as road non-linear coefficients rise in two modes. These insights deepen our understanding of DBS and EBS user choices for metro connections, improving the integration of these modes for first/last-mile journeys.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10612-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concurrent availability of shared bikes (DBS) and emerging shared e-bikes (EBS) systems offers new opportunities for sustainable urban mobility, particularly in enhancing first/last-mile connectivity with metro systems. However, a significant gap exists in understanding user choice behavior between DBS and EBS for metro connectivity. As shared micromobility options, DBS and EBS exhibit more competitive and complementary relationships compared to other transport modes when integrated with metro services. This study aims to bridge this gap by exploring the factors that influence the choice of DBS and EBS as metro connection modes. Taking Kunming—a Chinese city where both modes coexist—as a case study, the study identifies DBS and EBS trips connecting to the metro using operational data analyzed through the K-dimensional tree method (KDTree) along with Kernel Density Estimation analysis (KDE) methods. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model analyzes nonlinear effects in both to-metro and from-metro scenarios across four aspects: socioeconomic attributes, travel characteristics, the built environment, and transportation facilities. The results indicate that transportation facilities and the built environment significantly influence DBS and EBS user choices for metro connections, with notable nonlinear effects. For instance, cycling distance significantly influences mode choices. Initially, the probability of selecting EBS increases with cycling distance, then stabilizes. The likelihood of choosing EBS initially decreases and then increases as road non-linear coefficients rise in two modes. These insights deepen our understanding of DBS and EBS user choices for metro connections, improving the integration of these modes for first/last-mile journeys.

城市连接中的共享出行选择:共享自行车与共享电动自行车
共享自行车(DBS)和新兴的共享电动自行车(EBS)系统的同时可用性为可持续城市交通提供了新的机会,特别是在增强与地铁系统的第一/最后一英里连接方面。然而,对于城域连接,在理解DBS和EBS之间的用户选择行为方面存在很大的差距。作为共享的微交通选择,与其他交通方式相比,当与地铁服务集成时,DBS和EBS表现出更具竞争力和互补性的关系。本研究旨在通过探讨影响DBS和EBS作为城域连接方式选择的因素来弥合这一差距。该研究以两种模式并存的中国城市昆明为例,利用k维树法(KDTree)和核密度估计分析(KDE)方法分析的运营数据,确定了连接地铁的DBS和EBS行程。光梯度增强机(LightGBM)模型从社会经济属性、出行特征、建筑环境和交通设施四个方面分析了到地铁和离地铁场景的非线性效应。结果表明:交通设施和建成环境显著影响DBS和EBS用户对地铁连接的选择,且具有显著的非线性效应;例如,骑行距离显著影响模式选择。最初,选择EBS的概率随着循环距离的增加而增加,然后趋于稳定。在两种模式下,随着道路非线性系数的增大,选择EBS的可能性先减小后增大。这些见解加深了我们对DBS和EBS用户选择地铁连接的理解,改善了这些模式在第一/最后一英里旅程中的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信