Evaluation of Nosocomial Infection Management Efficiency Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis Model.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S520382
Jin Wang, Gan Wang, Chaoyi Qi
{"title":"Evaluation of Nosocomial Infection Management Efficiency Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis Model.","authors":"Jin Wang, Gan Wang, Chaoyi Qi","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S520382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study used data envelopment analysis (DEA), to assess relative efficiency of infection control in different clinical departments of the hospital for performance evaluation purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All wards and departments from January to December 2022 were selected as decision units, and five input and two output indicators related to infection prevention and control were determined using DEA. Pure technical efficiency was evaluated using the Banker-Charnes-Cooper (BCC) model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, the input-output indexes of the 27 clinical departments varied significantly. The average values of technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency, and comprehensive benefit were 0.987, 0.995, 0.992, and 0.980, respectively. Among the 27 departments, 52% exhibited constant returns to scale, 44% showed increasing returns to scale, and 4% had decreasing returns to scale. In the context of DEA, 44% of the departments were classified as highly efficient, indicating that their input-output ratios had reached an optimal state. Meanwhile, 56% of the departments were identified as non-DEA efficient, suggesting that there was room for improvement in their input-output efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improvement of input-output indexes of non-DEA effective clinical departments was defined by the BCC model. Use of DMUs could improve the efficiency of inventory control by optimizing the allocation of inventory control resources and refining inventory control measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1197-1208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S520382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study used data envelopment analysis (DEA), to assess relative efficiency of infection control in different clinical departments of the hospital for performance evaluation purposes.

Methods: All wards and departments from January to December 2022 were selected as decision units, and five input and two output indicators related to infection prevention and control were determined using DEA. Pure technical efficiency was evaluated using the Banker-Charnes-Cooper (BCC) model.

Results: In the study, the input-output indexes of the 27 clinical departments varied significantly. The average values of technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency, and comprehensive benefit were 0.987, 0.995, 0.992, and 0.980, respectively. Among the 27 departments, 52% exhibited constant returns to scale, 44% showed increasing returns to scale, and 4% had decreasing returns to scale. In the context of DEA, 44% of the departments were classified as highly efficient, indicating that their input-output ratios had reached an optimal state. Meanwhile, 56% of the departments were identified as non-DEA efficient, suggesting that there was room for improvement in their input-output efficiency.

Conclusion: The improvement of input-output indexes of non-DEA effective clinical departments was defined by the BCC model. Use of DMUs could improve the efficiency of inventory control by optimizing the allocation of inventory control resources and refining inventory control measures.

基于数据包络分析模型的医院感染管理效率评价。
背景:本研究采用数据包络分析法(DEA)评估医院不同临床科室感染控制的相对效率,以进行绩效评估:本研究采用数据包络分析法(DEA)评估医院不同临床科室感染控制的相对效率,以达到绩效评价的目的:方法:选取 2022 年 1 月至 12 月的所有病房和科室作为决策单位,使用 DEA 确定与感染预防和控制相关的 5 个投入和 2 个产出指标。采用班克-查恩斯-库珀(Banker-Charnes-Cooper,BCC)模型对纯技术效率进行评价:研究发现,27 个临床科室的投入产出指标差异显著。技术效率、纯技术效率、规模效率和综合效益的平均值分别为 0.987、0.995、0.992 和 0.980。在 27 个部门中,52%表现为规模收益不变,44%表现为规模收益递增,4%规模收益递减。在 DEA 中,44% 的部门被归类为高效率,表明其投入产出比已达到最佳状态。与此同时,56%的部门被认定为非 DEA 有效率,表明其投入产出效率还有待提高:结论:BCC 模型确定了非 DEA 有效临床科室投入产出指标的改善情况。使用 DMU 可以优化库存控制资源配置,完善库存控制措施,从而提高库存控制效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信