Advancements in analytical methods for studying the human gut microbiome.

Journal of biological methods Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14440/jbm.2024.0050
Gijsbert J Jansen, Gerard P Schouten, Marit Wiersma
{"title":"Advancements in analytical methods for studying the human gut microbiome.","authors":"Gijsbert J Jansen, Gerard P Schouten, Marit Wiersma","doi":"10.14440/jbm.2024.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The human gut microbiome, a complex ecosystem of microorganisms, plays a crucial role in maintaining human health. Perturbations in its composition are linked to a wide range of health conditions.</p><p><strong>Analytical techniques: </strong>Researchers employ various techniques to study the gut microbiome, each having its own strengths and limitations. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is highly sensitive but dependent on the quality of DNA extraction. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is powerful but can be costly and requires extensive data analysis. Furthermore, the accuracy of NGS results also depends heavily on the quality of the DNA extraction process. Culture methods, while useful, are biased and time-consuming. Fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization (FISH) excels in visualizing specific microbial populations and is the only method capable of providing <i>in situ</i> information. However, until recently, FISH was heavily reliant on human interpretation of digital photomicrographs, limiting its application in high-throughput strategies. Additionally, the sensitivity of FISH is restricted by the number of cells visualized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these methods is essential for drawing robust conclusions in microbiome research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological methods","volume":"12 1","pages":"e99010038"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2024.0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The human gut microbiome, a complex ecosystem of microorganisms, plays a crucial role in maintaining human health. Perturbations in its composition are linked to a wide range of health conditions.

Analytical techniques: Researchers employ various techniques to study the gut microbiome, each having its own strengths and limitations. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is highly sensitive but dependent on the quality of DNA extraction. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is powerful but can be costly and requires extensive data analysis. Furthermore, the accuracy of NGS results also depends heavily on the quality of the DNA extraction process. Culture methods, while useful, are biased and time-consuming. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) excels in visualizing specific microbial populations and is the only method capable of providing in situ information. However, until recently, FISH was heavily reliant on human interpretation of digital photomicrographs, limiting its application in high-throughput strategies. Additionally, the sensitivity of FISH is restricted by the number of cells visualized.

Conclusion: Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these methods is essential for drawing robust conclusions in microbiome research.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信