Deep learning-based automated segmentation and quantification of the dural sac cross-sectional area in lumbar spine MRI.

Frontiers in radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fradi.2025.1503625
George Ghobrial, Christian Roth
{"title":"Deep learning-based automated segmentation and quantification of the dural sac cross-sectional area in lumbar spine MRI.","authors":"George Ghobrial, Christian Roth","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2025.1503625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a critical role in diagnosing and planning treatment for spinal conditions such as degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, and disc herniation. Measuring the cross-sectional area of the dural sac (DSCA) is a key factor in evaluating the severity of spinal canal narrowing. Traditionally, radiologists perform this measurement manually, which is both time-consuming and susceptible to errors. Advances in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) like the U-Net architecture, have demonstrated significant potential in the analysis of medical images. This study evaluates the efficacy of deep learning models for automating DSCA measurements in lumbar spine MRIs to enhance diagnostic precision and alleviate the workload of radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For algorithm development and assessment, we utilized two extensive, anonymized online datasets: the \"Lumbar Spine MRI Dataset\" and the SPIDER-MRI dataset. The combined dataset comprised 683 lumbar spine MRI scans for training and testing, with an additional 50 scans reserved for external validation. We implemented and assessed three deep learning models-U-Net, Attention U-Net, and MultiResUNet-using 5-fold cross-validation. The models were trained on T1-weighted axial MRI images and evaluated on metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and mean absolute error (MAE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models exhibited a high correlation between predicted and actual DSCA values. The MultiResUNet model achieved superior results, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9917 and an MAE of 23.7032 mm<sup>2</sup> on the primary dataset. This high precision and reliability were consistent in external validation, where the MultiResUNet model attained an accuracy of 99.95%, a recall of 0.9989, and an F1-score of 0.9393. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that most discrepancies between predicted and actual DSCA values fell within the limits of agreement, further affirming the robustness of these models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates that deep learning models, particularly MultiResUNet, offer high accuracy and reliability in the automated segmentation and calculation of DSCA in lumbar spine MRIs. These models hold significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing the workload of radiologists. Despite some limitations, such as the restricted dataset size and reliance on T1-weighted images, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning in medical imaging. Future research should include larger, more diverse datasets and additional image weightings to further validate and enhance the generalizability and clinical utility of these models.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"1503625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2025.1503625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a critical role in diagnosing and planning treatment for spinal conditions such as degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, and disc herniation. Measuring the cross-sectional area of the dural sac (DSCA) is a key factor in evaluating the severity of spinal canal narrowing. Traditionally, radiologists perform this measurement manually, which is both time-consuming and susceptible to errors. Advances in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) like the U-Net architecture, have demonstrated significant potential in the analysis of medical images. This study evaluates the efficacy of deep learning models for automating DSCA measurements in lumbar spine MRIs to enhance diagnostic precision and alleviate the workload of radiologists.

Methods: For algorithm development and assessment, we utilized two extensive, anonymized online datasets: the "Lumbar Spine MRI Dataset" and the SPIDER-MRI dataset. The combined dataset comprised 683 lumbar spine MRI scans for training and testing, with an additional 50 scans reserved for external validation. We implemented and assessed three deep learning models-U-Net, Attention U-Net, and MultiResUNet-using 5-fold cross-validation. The models were trained on T1-weighted axial MRI images and evaluated on metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and mean absolute error (MAE).

Results: All models exhibited a high correlation between predicted and actual DSCA values. The MultiResUNet model achieved superior results, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9917 and an MAE of 23.7032 mm2 on the primary dataset. This high precision and reliability were consistent in external validation, where the MultiResUNet model attained an accuracy of 99.95%, a recall of 0.9989, and an F1-score of 0.9393. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that most discrepancies between predicted and actual DSCA values fell within the limits of agreement, further affirming the robustness of these models.

Discussion: This study demonstrates that deep learning models, particularly MultiResUNet, offer high accuracy and reliability in the automated segmentation and calculation of DSCA in lumbar spine MRIs. These models hold significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing the workload of radiologists. Despite some limitations, such as the restricted dataset size and reliance on T1-weighted images, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning in medical imaging. Future research should include larger, more diverse datasets and additional image weightings to further validate and enhance the generalizability and clinical utility of these models.

基于深度学习的腰椎MRI硬脑膜囊截面积自动分割与量化。
腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断和治疗退行性椎间盘疾病、椎管狭窄和椎间盘突出等脊柱疾病方面起着至关重要的作用。测量硬脊膜囊的横截面积(DSCA)是评估椎管狭窄严重程度的关键因素。传统上,放射科医生手动进行这种测量,既耗时又容易出错。深度学习的进步,特别是像U-Net架构这样的卷积神经网络(cnn),已经在医学图像分析方面展示了巨大的潜力。本研究评估了深度学习模型在腰椎mri中自动化DSCA测量的有效性,以提高诊断精度并减轻放射科医生的工作量。方法:为了算法开发和评估,我们利用了两个广泛的匿名在线数据集:“腰椎MRI数据集”和spider MRI数据集。合并的数据集包括用于训练和测试的683个腰椎MRI扫描,另外50个扫描保留用于外部验证。我们使用5倍交叉验证实现并评估了三种深度学习模型——U-Net、Attention U-Net和multiresunet。模型在t1加权轴向MRI图像上进行训练,并对准确性、精密度、召回率、f1评分和平均绝对误差(MAE)等指标进行评估。结果:所有模型均显示预测值与实际DSCA值高度相关。MultiResUNet模型在主数据集上的Pearson相关系数为0.9917,MAE为23.7032 mm2,取得了较好的效果。这种高精度和可靠性在外部验证中是一致的,其中MultiResUNet模型的准确率为99.95%,召回率为0.9989,f1得分为0.9393。Bland-Altman分析显示,预测和实际DSCA值之间的大部分差异都在一致的范围内,进一步肯定了这些模型的稳健性。讨论:本研究表明,深度学习模型,特别是MultiResUNet,在腰椎mri DSCA的自动分割和计算中提供了很高的准确性和可靠性。这些模型在提高诊断准确性和减少放射科医生的工作量方面具有重要的潜力。尽管存在一些局限性,例如数据集大小受限和对t1加权图像的依赖,但本研究为深度学习在医学成像中的应用提供了有价值的见解。未来的研究应该包括更大、更多样化的数据集和额外的图像加权,以进一步验证和提高这些模型的普遍性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信