Aorta Wall Stress during Exercise in Patients with an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Insights from a Case Series.

Q3 Medicine
AORTA Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1055/a-2558-4266
Mark J Haykowsky, Rachel J Skow, Stephen J Foulkes, Justin Grenier, John A Elefteriades, Richard B Thompson, M Sean McMurtry
{"title":"Aorta Wall Stress during Exercise in Patients with an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Insights from a Case Series.","authors":"Mark J Haykowsky, Rachel J Skow, Stephen J Foulkes, Justin Grenier, John A Elefteriades, Richard B Thompson, M Sean McMurtry","doi":"10.1055/a-2558-4266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) are recommended to avoid intense exercise for fear of marked increases in aortic wall stress (AWS). However, no study has measured AWS during exercise. The aim of this case series was to examine AWS during \"light-to-moderate\" aerobic exercise in individuals with ATAA and healthy control (CON) participants.Three clinically stable patients with ATAA (2 male, mean age: 74 ± 1 years) and 3 CON (2 male, mean age: 69 ± 7 years) were studied on 2 separate days. Day 1: a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed to measure peak aerobic power (VO<sub>2</sub>peak), maximal heart rate, and blood pressure (BP). Day 2: cardiac and aortic magnetic resonance imaging were performed at rest and during submaximal (3-5 metabolic equivalents) \"stepper\" exercise during which cardiac output (Qc), aorta diameters, wall thickness, and BP were measured. Circumferential ascending and descending AWS were calculated in accord with LaPlace Law, whereas aorta mechanical efficiency was derived as the AWS/Qc slope.Patients with ATAA demonstrated lower median VO<sub>2</sub>peak (18.2 vs. 24.1 mL/kg/min). During exercise, the absolute ascending (ATAA: 257 vs. CON: 269 kPa) and descending AWS increased (ATAA: 224 vs. CON: 207 kPa), and ∆AWS during exercise was similar between ATAA and CON (Ascending, ATAA: 79 vs. CON: 62 kPa; Descending, ATAA: 64 vs. CON: 55 kPa). During exercise, ascending and descending AWS were 76 to 83% below ATAA rupture thresholds (i.e., 800-1,200 kPa) in all patients. Finally, exercise Qc was 17% lower and the ascending AWS/Qc slope was 30% higher in ATAA (16 kPa/L/min) versus CON (12 kPa/L/min).Our findings demonstrate \"light-to-moderate\" aerobic exercise produces similar AWS responses between ATAA and CON and is well below aneurysmal rupture thresholds. The higher AWS/Qc slope in ATAA suggests decreased aortic mechanical efficiency and may be a useful measure for exercise prescription for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":52392,"journal":{"name":"AORTA","volume":" ","pages":"108-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AORTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2558-4266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) are recommended to avoid intense exercise for fear of marked increases in aortic wall stress (AWS). However, no study has measured AWS during exercise. The aim of this case series was to examine AWS during "light-to-moderate" aerobic exercise in individuals with ATAA and healthy control (CON) participants.Three clinically stable patients with ATAA (2 male, mean age: 74 ± 1 years) and 3 CON (2 male, mean age: 69 ± 7 years) were studied on 2 separate days. Day 1: a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed to measure peak aerobic power (VO2peak), maximal heart rate, and blood pressure (BP). Day 2: cardiac and aortic magnetic resonance imaging were performed at rest and during submaximal (3-5 metabolic equivalents) "stepper" exercise during which cardiac output (Qc), aorta diameters, wall thickness, and BP were measured. Circumferential ascending and descending AWS were calculated in accord with LaPlace Law, whereas aorta mechanical efficiency was derived as the AWS/Qc slope.Patients with ATAA demonstrated lower median VO2peak (18.2 vs. 24.1 mL/kg/min). During exercise, the absolute ascending (ATAA: 257 vs. CON: 269 kPa) and descending AWS increased (ATAA: 224 vs. CON: 207 kPa), and ∆AWS during exercise was similar between ATAA and CON (Ascending, ATAA: 79 vs. CON: 62 kPa; Descending, ATAA: 64 vs. CON: 55 kPa). During exercise, ascending and descending AWS were 76 to 83% below ATAA rupture thresholds (i.e., 800-1,200 kPa) in all patients. Finally, exercise Qc was 17% lower and the ascending AWS/Qc slope was 30% higher in ATAA (16 kPa/L/min) versus CON (12 kPa/L/min).Our findings demonstrate "light-to-moderate" aerobic exercise produces similar AWS responses between ATAA and CON and is well below aneurysmal rupture thresholds. The higher AWS/Qc slope in ATAA suggests decreased aortic mechanical efficiency and may be a useful measure for exercise prescription for these patients.

胸升主动脉瘤患者运动时的主动脉壁压力:来自病例系列的见解。
胸升主动脉瘤(ATAA)患者建议避免剧烈运动,以免显著增加主动脉壁压力(AWS)。然而,没有研究测量运动期间的AWS。本病例系列的目的是检查ATAA患者和健康对照组(CON)参与者在“轻至中度”有氧运动期间的AWS。3例临床稳定的ATAA患者(2例男性,平均年龄74±1岁)和3例CON患者(2例男性,平均年龄69±7岁)分别在2天内进行研究。第1天:进行最大心肺运动试验,测量峰值有氧能力(vo2峰值)、最大心率和血压(BP)。第2天:静息和亚极大期(3-5代谢当量)时进行心脏和主动脉磁共振成像。“步进式”运动,测量心输出量(Qc)、主动脉直径、壁厚和血压。根据拉普拉斯定律计算圆周上升和下降的AWS,而主动脉的机械效率为AWS/Qc斜率。ATAA患者的VO2peak中值较低(18.2 vs. 24.1 mL/kg/min)。运动时,绝对上升(ATAA: 257 vs. CON: 269 kPa)和下降AWS增加(ATAA: 224 vs. CON: 207 kPa),运动时的∆AWS在ATAA和CON之间相似(上升,ATAA: 79 vs. CON: 62 kPa;下降,ATAA: 64 vs. CON: 55 kPa)。在运动过程中,所有患者的上升和下降AWS均比ATAA破裂阈值(即800- 1200 kPa)低76 - 83%。最后,ATAA组(16 kPa/L/min)与CON组(12 kPa/L/min)相比,运动Qc降低17%,AWS/Qc上升斜率提高30%。我们的研究结果表明,“轻度至中度”有氧运动在ATAA和CON之间产生相似的AWS反应,并且远低于动脉瘤破裂阈值。ATAA中较高的AWS/Qc斜率表明主动脉机械效率降低,可能是这些患者运动处方的有用指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AORTA
AORTA Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信