{"title":"Contraceptive practices in Québec in relation to immigration: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Québec Population Health Survey.","authors":"Audrey Gonin, Sylvie Lévesque, Paule Lespérance, Cindy Dubois, Marianne Rodrigue","doi":"10.17269/s41997-025-01018-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the association between immigration status and women's contraceptive practices based on population data from government surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis was conducted on the Quebec Population Health Survey (2014-2015), which aimed to represent 98.8% of the population of Quebec aged 15 years and older through stratified sampling and data weighting (response rate of 61%). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare contraceptive practices between immigrant and Canadian-born women. Two dependent variables were considered: (1) women who used contraception vs. no contraceptive method of any kind, and (2) among women who used contraception, those who used methods that required them to access health care (birth control pill, IUD, or tubal ligation) vs. women who used other methods (condom, coitus interruptus, other).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logistic regression results revealed a strong association between immigration status and contraceptive practices, at two levels: (1) immigrant women had lower odds to use contraception than Canadian-born women; and (2) of the women who use contraception, immigrants had lower odds than those born in Canada to use feminine medical contraception. These findings held true for immigrant women regardless of the number of years they have spent in Canada. Women who lived in low-income households or who had not had a medical consultation for more than one year also had lower odds to use feminine medical contraception.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers in access to contraceptive care interfere with women's reproductive health and autonomy. The lower odds for immigrant women to use contraception, and particularly the most effective methods, suggest that their contraceptive care needs are at least partially unmet or inadequately addressed. This is concerning given that other studies show no differences in fertility intention between immigrant and Canadian-born women, and high rates of abortion for immigrant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01018-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to examine the association between immigration status and women's contraceptive practices based on population data from government surveys.
Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted on the Quebec Population Health Survey (2014-2015), which aimed to represent 98.8% of the population of Quebec aged 15 years and older through stratified sampling and data weighting (response rate of 61%). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare contraceptive practices between immigrant and Canadian-born women. Two dependent variables were considered: (1) women who used contraception vs. no contraceptive method of any kind, and (2) among women who used contraception, those who used methods that required them to access health care (birth control pill, IUD, or tubal ligation) vs. women who used other methods (condom, coitus interruptus, other).
Results: The logistic regression results revealed a strong association between immigration status and contraceptive practices, at two levels: (1) immigrant women had lower odds to use contraception than Canadian-born women; and (2) of the women who use contraception, immigrants had lower odds than those born in Canada to use feminine medical contraception. These findings held true for immigrant women regardless of the number of years they have spent in Canada. Women who lived in low-income households or who had not had a medical consultation for more than one year also had lower odds to use feminine medical contraception.
Conclusion: Barriers in access to contraceptive care interfere with women's reproductive health and autonomy. The lower odds for immigrant women to use contraception, and particularly the most effective methods, suggest that their contraceptive care needs are at least partially unmet or inadequately addressed. This is concerning given that other studies show no differences in fertility intention between immigrant and Canadian-born women, and high rates of abortion for immigrant women.
目的:本研究旨在根据政府调查的人口数据,研究移民身份与妇女避孕措施之间的关系。方法:对2014-2015年魁北克省人口健康调查(Quebec Population Health Survey)进行二次数据分析,通过分层抽样和数据加权,覆盖魁北克省98.8%的15岁及以上人口(应答率61%)。单变量和多变量分析用于比较移民和加拿大出生妇女的避孕措施。考虑了两个因变量:(1)使用避孕方法的妇女与没有任何避孕方法的妇女;(2)在使用避孕方法的妇女中,使用需要获得卫生保健的方法的妇女(避孕药、宫内节育器或输卵管结扎)与使用其他方法的妇女(避孕套、性交中断、其他)。结果:logistic回归结果显示,移民身份与避孕措施之间存在较强的相关性,在两个层面上:(1)移民妇女使用避孕措施的几率低于加拿大出生妇女;(2)在使用避孕措施的妇女中,移民比在加拿大出生的妇女使用女性药物避孕的几率低。这些发现适用于移民女性,无论她们在加拿大生活了多少年。生活在低收入家庭或一年以上没有就诊的妇女使用女性药物避孕的几率也较低。结论:获得避孕护理的障碍影响了妇女的生殖健康和自主。移民妇女使用避孕措施的几率较低,尤其是最有效的避孕方法,这表明她们的避孕护理需求至少部分没有得到满足或没有得到充分解决。考虑到其他研究表明移民妇女和加拿大出生妇女在生育意愿上没有差异,以及移民妇女的高堕胎率,这一点令人担忧。
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities.
CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health.
CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.
Énoncé de mission
La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé.
La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations.
La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.