The Science of Statistical Practice.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Manisha Desai, Shari Messinger, Walter T Ambrosius, Nichole E Carlson, Josée Dupuis, Debashis Ghosh, Matthew J Hayat, Douglas Landsittel, Matthew S Mayo, Robert A Oster, Paula K Roberson, Philip Turk
{"title":"The Science of Statistical Practice.","authors":"Manisha Desai, Shari Messinger, Walter T Ambrosius, Nichole E Carlson, Josée Dupuis, Debashis Ghosh, Matthew J Hayat, Douglas Landsittel, Matthew S Mayo, Robert A Oster, Paula K Roberson, Philip Turk","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, emphasize the importance of quantitative methods and their applications when conducting increasingly data-intensive research. The scientific discipline of statistical practice is critical for achieving rigor in research addressing important domain-level questions. The misconception that statistical practice is not a science but rather a service threatens scientific rigor and compromises the quality of its contribution to clinical and translational research. The authors call on academic and research leadership to recognize statistical practice as a key scientific discipline and to further ensure that the field and its scientists are nurtured. To that end, academic homes for faculty of statistical practice and its scholarship need to be fostered with clear pathways to hire, retain, promote, and tenure faculty who are largely team scientists. This goal can be achieved inclusively by avoiding the creation of separate faculty lines that might imply differing levels of value. In contrast, we must recognize and appreciate equally significant intellectual contributions made by various types of faculty members. Additionally, engagement of statistical practitioners as peer scientists and coleaders in collaborative research will ensure higher quality and rigor of scientific endeavors. Finally, leaders of statistical practice must be included in critical discussions around strategic development for academic and other research organizations for those institutions to achieve their missions in this modern era of data-intensive research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, emphasize the importance of quantitative methods and their applications when conducting increasingly data-intensive research. The scientific discipline of statistical practice is critical for achieving rigor in research addressing important domain-level questions. The misconception that statistical practice is not a science but rather a service threatens scientific rigor and compromises the quality of its contribution to clinical and translational research. The authors call on academic and research leadership to recognize statistical practice as a key scientific discipline and to further ensure that the field and its scientists are nurtured. To that end, academic homes for faculty of statistical practice and its scholarship need to be fostered with clear pathways to hire, retain, promote, and tenure faculty who are largely team scientists. This goal can be achieved inclusively by avoiding the creation of separate faculty lines that might imply differing levels of value. In contrast, we must recognize and appreciate equally significant intellectual contributions made by various types of faculty members. Additionally, engagement of statistical practitioners as peer scientists and coleaders in collaborative research will ensure higher quality and rigor of scientific endeavors. Finally, leaders of statistical practice must be included in critical discussions around strategic development for academic and other research organizations for those institutions to achieve their missions in this modern era of data-intensive research.

摘要:人工智能等新兴技术强调了定量方法及其应用在开展日益数据密集型研究时的重要性。统计实践这门科学对于在解决重要领域问题的研究中实现严谨性至关重要。认为统计实践不是一门科学,而是一种服务的错误观念威胁着科学的严谨性,并损害了统计实践对临床和转化研究的贡献质量。作者呼吁学术和研究领导层承认统计实践是一门重要的科学学科,并进一步确保该领域及其科学家得到培养。为此,需要为统计实践及其学术研究的教职员工建立学术家园,并为聘用、留用、晋升和终身教职教职员工提供明确的途径,这些教职员工在很大程度上是团队科学家。要实现这一目标,就必须避免设立可能意味着不同价值水平的独立师资系列。与此相反,我们必须承认并赞赏各类教员在智力方面做出的同等重要贡献。此外,让统计实践者作为同行科学家和合作研究的共同领导者参与进来,将确保科学工作的更高质量和严谨性。最后,统计实践的领导者必须参与围绕学术和其他研究组织战略发展的重要讨论,以便这些机构在这个数据密集型研究的现代实现其使命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信