Qualities Medical Students Value in Resident Educators: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medical Student Nominations for Teaching Awards.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Dana G Rowe, Alexandria L Soto, Megan N Happ, Shannon M Barter, Susanna S Hill
{"title":"Qualities Medical Students Value in Resident Educators: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medical Student Nominations for Teaching Awards.","authors":"Dana G Rowe, Alexandria L Soto, Megan N Happ, Shannon M Barter, Susanna S Hill","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Resident physicians play a pivotal role in undergraduate medical education, serving as stewards of the academic and clinical learning environment. However, limited data exist on qualities valued by medical students in resident educators. This study explores the qualities medical students perceive as most valuable in resident educators and whether these qualities differ by resident gender or specialty.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods analysis of medical student nominations for resident teaching awards at a single U.S. academic institution (January 2014 to May 2022) was conducted. A thematic codebook was developed through iterative review to identify relevant themes, with coding discrepancies resolved through discussion. The research team decided a priori to analyze whether differences in thematic frequency existed based on resident gender and resident specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 747 nominations across 8 specialties revealed 4 thematic categories emphasized by student nominators: teaching qualities, admirable skills, personality, and general praise. Prioritizing teaching (375 [50.2%]) and creating a safe learning environment (269 [36.0%]) were the most frequently cited qualities. Being supportive (165 [22.1%]) and welcoming (136 [18.2%]) were recurring personality traits. Themes were largely consistent across genders. Clinical and leadership skills were mentioned more frequently in nonsurgical resident nominations (150 [30.8%] vs 50 [19.2%], P < .001, and 47 [9.7%] vs 14 [5.4%], P = .04, respectively), whereas patience was mentioned more frequently in surgical resident nominations (25 [9.6%] vs 24 [4.9%], P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights 3 key qualities that medical students consistently lauded in resident educators: fostering a safe learning environment, prioritizing teaching, and demonstrating effective teaching skills. These qualities were universally emphasized across genders and specialties, underscoring their fundamental role in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Resident physicians play a pivotal role in undergraduate medical education, serving as stewards of the academic and clinical learning environment. However, limited data exist on qualities valued by medical students in resident educators. This study explores the qualities medical students perceive as most valuable in resident educators and whether these qualities differ by resident gender or specialty.

Method: A mixed-methods analysis of medical student nominations for resident teaching awards at a single U.S. academic institution (January 2014 to May 2022) was conducted. A thematic codebook was developed through iterative review to identify relevant themes, with coding discrepancies resolved through discussion. The research team decided a priori to analyze whether differences in thematic frequency existed based on resident gender and resident specialty.

Results: Analysis of 747 nominations across 8 specialties revealed 4 thematic categories emphasized by student nominators: teaching qualities, admirable skills, personality, and general praise. Prioritizing teaching (375 [50.2%]) and creating a safe learning environment (269 [36.0%]) were the most frequently cited qualities. Being supportive (165 [22.1%]) and welcoming (136 [18.2%]) were recurring personality traits. Themes were largely consistent across genders. Clinical and leadership skills were mentioned more frequently in nonsurgical resident nominations (150 [30.8%] vs 50 [19.2%], P < .001, and 47 [9.7%] vs 14 [5.4%], P = .04, respectively), whereas patience was mentioned more frequently in surgical resident nominations (25 [9.6%] vs 24 [4.9%], P = .01).

Conclusions: This study highlights 3 key qualities that medical students consistently lauded in resident educators: fostering a safe learning environment, prioritizing teaching, and demonstrating effective teaching skills. These qualities were universally emphasized across genders and specialties, underscoring their fundamental role in medical education.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信