Effect of printing orientation on structural strength of 3D-printed polylactic acid prosthetic socket using fused deposition modeling.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Adila Fazliana Che Manan, Mohd Juzaila Abd Latif, Misalini Narasamman, Masjuri Musa, Mohd Nazim Abdul Rahman, Guo Dong Lim, Parathy Rajaandra
{"title":"Effect of printing orientation on structural strength of 3D-printed polylactic acid prosthetic socket using fused deposition modeling.","authors":"Adila Fazliana Che Manan, Mohd Juzaila Abd Latif, Misalini Narasamman, Masjuri Musa, Mohd Nazim Abdul Rahman, Guo Dong Lim, Parathy Rajaandra","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology could offer accessible socket fabrication and resolve conventional fabrication issues. However, the printing orientation in FDM affects the structural integrity and reliability.Objective:To examine the effect of printing orientation on the structural strength of 3D-printed sockets using FDM.Study Design:Experimental study of 3D-printed socket at different printing orientations in static and cyclic loadings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study scanned residual limbs of 2 transtibial amputees weighing 53 kg (P4) and 125 kg (P6) to create 3D-printed prosthetic sockets using FDM. Ten sockets of a P4 amputee were printed at various orientations from 0° to 90° for a structural static test. In addition, 6 sockets of the P6 amputee were printed at 90° for static and cyclic tests according to ISO 10328.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the results, sockets printed at 0° and 90° for the P4 amputee exceeded static ultimate force under condition I according to ISO 10328 standards with 4880 N and 4430 N, respectively. Sockets at 30°, 45°, and 60° failed before the minimum force requirement was reached. Further validation of the 90° printed socket passed the static test in conditions I and II, and the cyclic test in condition II, enduring 3 million cycles without failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 0° and 90° printing orientations are recommended for their superior mechanical properties, whereas other orientations may pose safety risks because of insufficient structural strength. These findings could contribute to developing more reliable and durable prosthetic sockets that meet ISO 10328 standards to enhance the quality of life for amputees.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology could offer accessible socket fabrication and resolve conventional fabrication issues. However, the printing orientation in FDM affects the structural integrity and reliability.Objective:To examine the effect of printing orientation on the structural strength of 3D-printed sockets using FDM.Study Design:Experimental study of 3D-printed socket at different printing orientations in static and cyclic loadings.

Methods: This study scanned residual limbs of 2 transtibial amputees weighing 53 kg (P4) and 125 kg (P6) to create 3D-printed prosthetic sockets using FDM. Ten sockets of a P4 amputee were printed at various orientations from 0° to 90° for a structural static test. In addition, 6 sockets of the P6 amputee were printed at 90° for static and cyclic tests according to ISO 10328.

Results: Based on the results, sockets printed at 0° and 90° for the P4 amputee exceeded static ultimate force under condition I according to ISO 10328 standards with 4880 N and 4430 N, respectively. Sockets at 30°, 45°, and 60° failed before the minimum force requirement was reached. Further validation of the 90° printed socket passed the static test in conditions I and II, and the cyclic test in condition II, enduring 3 million cycles without failure.

Conclusion: The 0° and 90° printing orientations are recommended for their superior mechanical properties, whereas other orientations may pose safety risks because of insufficient structural strength. These findings could contribute to developing more reliable and durable prosthetic sockets that meet ISO 10328 standards to enhance the quality of life for amputees.

熔融沉积建模打印方向对3d打印聚乳酸假体插座结构强度的影响。
背景:最近的熔融沉积建模(FDM)技术可以提供可访问的插座制造和解决传统的制造问题。然而,在FDM中,打印方向会影响结构的完整性和可靠性。目的:探讨打印方向对FDM 3d打印支架结构强度的影响。研究设计:3d打印插座在静态和循环载荷下不同打印方向的实验研究。方法:本研究扫描了2例体重分别为53 kg (P4)和125 kg (P6)的经胫骨截肢者的残肢,利用FDM技术制作3d打印义肢窝。在0°到90°的不同方向上打印10个P4截肢者的插座进行结构静力测试。此外,根据ISO 10328, P6截肢者的6个插座在90°处打印,进行静态和循环测试。结果:根据结果,P4截肢者在0°和90°处印刷的插座分别在4880 N和4430 N的情况下超过了ISO 10328标准条件I下的静态极限力。在达到最小力要求之前,30°,45°和60°的插座失效。进一步验证,90°印刷插座通过了工况I和工况II的静态测试和工况II的循环测试,可承受300万次循环而无故障。结论:0°和90°打印方向力学性能优越,推荐使用,其他方向结构强度不足,存在安全隐患。这些发现有助于开发更可靠、更耐用的符合ISO 10328标准的假肢,以提高截肢者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信