Appropriate compression values for the transtibial prosthesis using the AERO prosthetic liner.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Yusuke Miyata, Yasmin Nutchamlong, Gary Guerra, Kazuhiko Sasaki
{"title":"Appropriate compression values for the transtibial prosthesis using the AERO prosthetic liner.","authors":"Yusuke Miyata, Yasmin Nutchamlong, Gary Guerra, Kazuhiko Sasaki","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive model rectification is a key factor in providing a comfortable and successful transtibial prosthetic socket fitting. This study aimed to assess whether a 4% compression value in 3- and 5-mm thickness affordable ethylene-vinyl acetate roll-on (AERO) liners yields acceptable comfort and pressure distribution for transtibial prosthetic users. Stump socks were used to adjust volume in the fitting process with a socket compressed to 4%, and pressure data were collected using 6 force-sensing resistor (FSR400) sensors placed in areas sensitive and tolerant to pressure. Peak pressure was collected from 40 steps, and pressure uniformity was calculated using the coefficient of variation in 2-min walking on the treadmill. The socket comfort score was collected after the trial. Appropriate compression values, pressure distribution, and socket comfort score were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect size was determined using Cliff's delta. The study found that a 4.95% compression was optimal for a 3-mm thickness liner, whereas a 4.5% compression suited a 5-mm liner better for comfort. Moreover, the study observed a small similarity in pressure distribution between liners, as indicated by Cliff's delta, with the 5-mm liner possibly providing more even pressure because of its thickness. Despite being made of the same material, liners with different thicknesses distribute pressure differently. Therefore, this study suggests that a 4% universal compression value in the affordable ethylene-vinyl acetate roll-on liner may be effective for use in a clinical setting. Future studies should include more participants to identify the appropriate compression for a variety of residual limbs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive model rectification is a key factor in providing a comfortable and successful transtibial prosthetic socket fitting. This study aimed to assess whether a 4% compression value in 3- and 5-mm thickness affordable ethylene-vinyl acetate roll-on (AERO) liners yields acceptable comfort and pressure distribution for transtibial prosthetic users. Stump socks were used to adjust volume in the fitting process with a socket compressed to 4%, and pressure data were collected using 6 force-sensing resistor (FSR400) sensors placed in areas sensitive and tolerant to pressure. Peak pressure was collected from 40 steps, and pressure uniformity was calculated using the coefficient of variation in 2-min walking on the treadmill. The socket comfort score was collected after the trial. Appropriate compression values, pressure distribution, and socket comfort score were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect size was determined using Cliff's delta. The study found that a 4.95% compression was optimal for a 3-mm thickness liner, whereas a 4.5% compression suited a 5-mm liner better for comfort. Moreover, the study observed a small similarity in pressure distribution between liners, as indicated by Cliff's delta, with the 5-mm liner possibly providing more even pressure because of its thickness. Despite being made of the same material, liners with different thicknesses distribute pressure differently. Therefore, this study suggests that a 4% universal compression value in the affordable ethylene-vinyl acetate roll-on liner may be effective for use in a clinical setting. Future studies should include more participants to identify the appropriate compression for a variety of residual limbs.

使用AERO假体衬垫对经胫骨假体进行适当的压缩值。
积极的模型矫正是提供舒适和成功的经胫骨假体窝安装的关键因素。本研究旨在评估在3毫米和5毫米厚度的可负担的乙烯-醋酸乙烯滚上(AERO)衬垫中,4%的压缩值是否为经胫骨义肢使用者提供可接受的舒适性和压力分布。在安装过程中,将套管压缩至4%,使用残肢袜来调节体积,并使用6个力感电阻(FSR400)传感器收集压力数据,这些传感器放置在对压力敏感和耐受的区域。采集40步的峰值压力,利用在跑步机上行走2分钟的变异系数计算压力均匀性。试验结束后收集插槽舒适度评分。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析合适的压缩值、压力分布和套孔舒适评分,并采用Cliff's delta确定效应大小。研究发现,对于3毫米厚的衬垫,4.95%的压缩率是最佳的,而对于5毫米厚的衬垫,4.5%的压缩率更适合舒适性。此外,研究还发现,正如Cliff's delta所示,衬垫之间的压力分布有一定的相似性,5毫米的衬垫可能由于其厚度而提供更均匀的压力。尽管由相同的材料制成,但不同厚度的衬垫分布的压力不同。因此,本研究表明,在负担得起的乙烯-醋酸乙烯滚上衬垫中,4%的通用压缩值可能在临床环境中有效使用。未来的研究应该包括更多的参与者,以确定各种残肢的适当压迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信