Evolution of Peak Inspiratory Flow During Hospitalization of Patients with COPD - A Prospective Monocentric Observational Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Philipp Suter, Thomas Grobéty, Julien Vaucher, Gaël Grandmaison
{"title":"Evolution of Peak Inspiratory Flow During Hospitalization of Patients with COPD - A Prospective Monocentric Observational Study.","authors":"Philipp Suter, Thomas Grobéty, Julien Vaucher, Gaël Grandmaison","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S512880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Effective treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) primarily relies on treatment delivered through inhaler devices. The effectiveness of dry powder inhalers is compromised by insufficient peak inspiratory flow (PIF). Understanding the evolution of PIF during hospitalization is crucial for optimizing inhaler selection and improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective monocentric observational study was conducted at Fribourg Hospital, Switzerland, from August 2022 to December 2022. PIF was assessed at hospital admission and discharge in all patients with COPD admitted to the internal medicine division. The primary outcome was the evolution of maximum PIF at a fixed medium-low resistance (R2) during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included the variation of PIF in the intra-assessment evaluation and transitioning between sufficient and insufficient PIF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine patients were enrolled, 61% were men and 65% experienced an acute COPD exacerbation (AECOPD). The maximum PIF for R2 increased from 64.8 ± 17.2 L/min at admission to 70.7 ± 17.9 L/min at discharge, showing a 5.9 L/min improvement (95% CI: 2.4-9.5, p < 0.01). A hospitalization >5 days in patients hospitalized for an AECOPD is associated with a higher increase in PIF (p < 0.05). In the intra-assessment measurement, we observed an increase in PIF in the successive measurements (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitalized patients with COPD experienced a significant increase in PIF during their stay. These results appear to be independent of the reason for hospitalization but need to be confirmed with a larger sample. Nevertheless, these findings underscore the importance of regular PIF assessment and influence inhaler selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"957-969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S512880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Effective treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) primarily relies on treatment delivered through inhaler devices. The effectiveness of dry powder inhalers is compromised by insufficient peak inspiratory flow (PIF). Understanding the evolution of PIF during hospitalization is crucial for optimizing inhaler selection and improving patient outcomes.

Patients and methods: A prospective monocentric observational study was conducted at Fribourg Hospital, Switzerland, from August 2022 to December 2022. PIF was assessed at hospital admission and discharge in all patients with COPD admitted to the internal medicine division. The primary outcome was the evolution of maximum PIF at a fixed medium-low resistance (R2) during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included the variation of PIF in the intra-assessment evaluation and transitioning between sufficient and insufficient PIF.

Results: Forty-nine patients were enrolled, 61% were men and 65% experienced an acute COPD exacerbation (AECOPD). The maximum PIF for R2 increased from 64.8 ± 17.2 L/min at admission to 70.7 ± 17.9 L/min at discharge, showing a 5.9 L/min improvement (95% CI: 2.4-9.5, p < 0.01). A hospitalization >5 days in patients hospitalized for an AECOPD is associated with a higher increase in PIF (p < 0.05). In the intra-assessment measurement, we observed an increase in PIF in the successive measurements (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Hospitalized patients with COPD experienced a significant increase in PIF during their stay. These results appear to be independent of the reason for hospitalization but need to be confirmed with a larger sample. Nevertheless, these findings underscore the importance of regular PIF assessment and influence inhaler selection.

COPD患者住院期间吸气流量峰值的演变——一项前瞻性单中心观察研究。
目的:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的有效治疗主要依靠吸入器装置。干粉吸入器的效果会因吸入峰值流量(PIF)不足而受到影响。了解住院期间吸入峰值流量的变化对于优化吸入器选择和改善患者预后至关重要:一项前瞻性单中心观察研究于 2022 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月在瑞士弗里堡医院进行。内科收治的所有慢性阻塞性肺病患者在入院和出院时均接受了 PIF 评估。主要结果是住院期间固定中低阻力(R2)下最大 PIF 的变化。次要结果包括评估期间 PIF 的变化以及 PIF 足够与不足之间的过渡:共有 49 名患者入选,其中 61% 为男性,65% 的患者经历过慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重 (AECOPD)。R2 的最大 PIF 从入院时的 64.8 ± 17.2 升/分钟增至出院时的 70.7 ± 17.9 升/分钟,提高了 5.9 升/分钟(95% CI:2.4-9.5,P < 0.01)。因 AECOPD 住院的患者中,住院时间超过 5 天的患者 PIF 升高幅度更大(p < 0.05)。在评估期间的测量中,我们观察到 PIF 在连续测量中有所上升(p < 0.01):结论:慢性阻塞性肺病住院患者在住院期间的 PIF 显著增加。这些结果似乎与住院原因无关,但还需要更多的样本来证实。尽管如此,这些发现强调了定期评估 PIF 的重要性,并影响了吸入器的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信