Longitudinal and Combined Smartwatch and Ecological Momentary Assessment in Racially Diverse Older Adults: Feasibility, Adherence, and Acceptability Study.

Abstract

Background: Due to the rising prevalence of Alzheimer disease and related dementias, easily deployable tools to quantify risk are needed. Smartphones and smartwatches enable unobtrusive and continuous monitoring, but there is limited information regarding the feasibility, adherence, and acceptability of digital data collection among racially diverse older adults.

Objective: This paper examined the feasibility, adherence, and acceptability of a 4-week combined smartwatch monitoring and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study in a racially diverse sample of older adults.

Methods: A total of 44 older adults (aged ≥55 y) with either mild cognitive impairment or healthy cognition completed an informed consent comprehension quiz, baseline cognitive testing, training regarding digital data collection, and questionnaires. Participants were instructed to wear a Garmin Vivosmart 4 smartwatch for 23 h/d for 4 weeks, sync 2 smartphone apps (Garmin and Labfront) daily, and complete a daily EMA survey with automated prompts for surveys and charging. Training time, smartwatch adherence (eg, wear time), daily EMA survey response rate, and performance on the consent quiz were quantified. Associations between feasibility and adherence metrics and participant factors were evaluated. Self-reported usability of the apps and smartwatch was collected at study end.

Results: Consent comprehension quiz scores were high (mean 97.33%, SD 6.86% correct), and training sessions lasted on average 17.93 (SD 6.89) minutes. During the 4-week study, participants wore the smartwatch for an average of 21 h/d (SD 1.53) and showed an average response rate of 94% (SD 9.58%) to daily EMA surveys. In unadjusted bivariate analyses, age, race, and cognition were associated with feasibility and adherence measures, but only age and race remained significant in multivariate models. After accounting for all participant factors, older age was a significant predictor of longer training time, and Black race was a significant predictor of lower daily wear time. On the usability survey, all participants (45/45, 100%) indicated willingness to participate in future smartwatch studies, >80% (37/45) had a positive experience, and >90% (41/45) were satisfied with smartphone app syncing.

Conclusions: Smartwatch monitoring, requiring daily wear, smartphone syncing, and daily EMA survey completion, is highly feasible in older adults because adherence to daily wear and EMA surveys was high, as was general satisfaction on usability surveys. Although older participants may require more training on smartwatch and smartphone procedures and automated prompting during the study period, longitudinal monitoring with the Garmin Vivosmart 4 smartwatch and Labfront app is acceptable and feasible for collecting nearly continuous data in Black and White older adults, including those with mild cognitive impairment and those without.