Blending Online and In-Person Seminars to Strengthen Clinical Placement Learning in Physiotherapy Education.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S502590
Slawomir Wojniusz, Anne Gudrun Langaas, Yngve Røe
{"title":"Blending Online and In-Person Seminars to Strengthen Clinical Placement Learning in Physiotherapy Education.","authors":"Slawomir Wojniusz, Anne Gudrun Langaas, Yngve Røe","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S502590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital technology continues to reshape health professions education, yet little is known about the relative effectiveness of synchronous online versus in-person collaborative learning in strengthening clinical placement experiences for physiotherapy students. This study examined physiotherapy students' expectations, perceptions, and preferences regarding online and in-person small-group seminars.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-randomized crossover design was used in two course iterations (I-1, I-2) involving 106 final-semester physiotherapy students. Participants were split into groups of 5-6 to engage in ten seminars discussing complex clinical cases drawn from their prior placements, with half of the groups starting online and later switching to in-person, and vice versa. A third iteration (I-3; n=77) alternated between online and in-person sessions following two initial in-person seminars. Data were gathered through anonymous electronic surveys containing Likert-scale ratings and open-text responses. Quantitative data were analyzed with t-tests and chi-square tests; qualitative comments underwent thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mid-course evaluations revealed no significant differences in perceived effectiveness when students had experienced only one format. By the course's end, however most students ultimately favored in-person seminars for richer social interaction (I-2: 80%; I-1: 38%; I-3: 54%), although they consistently recognized online sessions as time-efficient and flexible. Notably, students' initial expectations (I-1 and I-2) strongly mirrored their final evaluations. Qualitative feedback highlighted that in-person seminars provided higher-quality social interactions, while online seminars offered greater efficiency and flexibility. Most students indicated a preference for a blended format in future courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By blending in-person and online sessions, collaborative seminars can give physiotherapy students the best of both worlds for their clinical placement learning. Meeting in-person fosters richer discussions and deeper social connections, while online sessions offer efficiency, flexibility and help students develop essential digital competence. Together, these formats create a more adaptable, forward-looking learning environment that aligns with the evolving demands of professional practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"557-567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S502590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Digital technology continues to reshape health professions education, yet little is known about the relative effectiveness of synchronous online versus in-person collaborative learning in strengthening clinical placement experiences for physiotherapy students. This study examined physiotherapy students' expectations, perceptions, and preferences regarding online and in-person small-group seminars.

Methods: A quasi-randomized crossover design was used in two course iterations (I-1, I-2) involving 106 final-semester physiotherapy students. Participants were split into groups of 5-6 to engage in ten seminars discussing complex clinical cases drawn from their prior placements, with half of the groups starting online and later switching to in-person, and vice versa. A third iteration (I-3; n=77) alternated between online and in-person sessions following two initial in-person seminars. Data were gathered through anonymous electronic surveys containing Likert-scale ratings and open-text responses. Quantitative data were analyzed with t-tests and chi-square tests; qualitative comments underwent thematic analysis.

Results: Mid-course evaluations revealed no significant differences in perceived effectiveness when students had experienced only one format. By the course's end, however most students ultimately favored in-person seminars for richer social interaction (I-2: 80%; I-1: 38%; I-3: 54%), although they consistently recognized online sessions as time-efficient and flexible. Notably, students' initial expectations (I-1 and I-2) strongly mirrored their final evaluations. Qualitative feedback highlighted that in-person seminars provided higher-quality social interactions, while online seminars offered greater efficiency and flexibility. Most students indicated a preference for a blended format in future courses.

Conclusion: By blending in-person and online sessions, collaborative seminars can give physiotherapy students the best of both worlds for their clinical placement learning. Meeting in-person fosters richer discussions and deeper social connections, while online sessions offer efficiency, flexibility and help students develop essential digital competence. Together, these formats create a more adaptable, forward-looking learning environment that aligns with the evolving demands of professional practice.

结合线上和面对面的研讨会,加强物理治疗教育的临床实习学习。
导读:数字技术继续重塑卫生专业教育,然而,在加强物理治疗学生的临床实习经验方面,同步在线与面对面协作学习的相对有效性知之甚少。本研究考察了物理治疗学生对在线和面对面小组研讨会的期望、看法和偏好。方法:采用准随机交叉设计对106名期末物理治疗学生进行两次课程迭代(I-1、I-2)。参与者被分成5-6人一组,参加10次研讨会,讨论从他们之前的实习中提取的复杂临床病例,其中一半的小组从网上开始,后来转为面对面,反之亦然。第三次迭代(I-3;N =77)在最初的两次面对面研讨会之后,在在线和面对面会议之间交替进行。数据是通过匿名电子调查收集的,包括李克特量表评分和开放文本回复。定量资料采用t检验和卡方检验;对定性评论进行专题分析。结果:课程中期评估显示,当学生只体验一种形式时,他们的感知效果没有显著差异。然而,到课程结束时,大多数学生最终更喜欢面对面的研讨会,因为它能带来更丰富的社会互动(I-2: 80%;张:38%;I-3: 54%),尽管他们一致认为在线会议既省时又灵活。值得注意的是,学生最初的期望(I-1和I-2)强烈反映了他们最终的评估。定性反馈强调,面对面的研讨会提供了更高质量的社会互动,而在线研讨会提供了更高的效率和灵活性。大多数学生表示在未来的课程中更倾向于采用混合形式。结论:通过将面对面和在线课程相结合,协作研讨会可以为物理治疗专业的学生提供两全其美的临床实习学习。面对面的会议促进了更丰富的讨论和更深层次的社会联系,而在线课程提供了效率、灵活性,并帮助学生培养基本的数字能力。总之,这些形式创造了一个更具适应性和前瞻性的学习环境,与不断变化的专业实践需求保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信