The feasibility of monitoring trauma patients with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1111/trf.18241
Luis Da Luz, Sarah Atwi, Lowyl Notario, Rachael Irvine, Diane Farah, Delaney Johnston, Jon-Emile S Kenny, Joseph K Eibl, Dylan Pannell
{"title":"The feasibility of monitoring trauma patients with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound.","authors":"Luis Da Luz, Sarah Atwi, Lowyl Notario, Rachael Irvine, Diane Farah, Delaney Johnston, Jon-Emile S Kenny, Joseph K Eibl, Dylan Pannell","doi":"10.1111/trf.18241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of reduced stroke volume (SV) or cardiac output (CO) may expedite resuscitative interventions during traumatic hemorrhage; corrected carotid artery flow time (ccFT) has been proposed as a surrogate for SV during blood volume loss.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the feasibility of using a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound capable of measuring ccFT in traumatically injured patients at a level 1 trauma center. A convenience sample of 33 patients was enrolled. We assessed device placement, data transfer and capture, and signal quality by assessing the ability to capture at least 15 consecutive cardiac cycles in the minute prior to blood pressure monitor cycling. A post hoc analysis examined ccFT variations between transfused and non-transfused patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Device placement succeeded in 94% of patients (n = 31) and the data were captured and transferred from all 31. The consecutive cardiac cycles before blood pressure measurement exceeded 15 (p = .015) in 93% of patients (n = 28). We observed ccFT below 270 ms and longer time spent under this threshold during resuscitation in transfused patients. Patients with low ccFT experienced more severe injuries and longer hospital and ICU stays.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study that demonstrates the feasibility of using a wearable Doppler ultrasound in trauma patients on admission to the trauma bay. Although findings suggest that ccFT could serve as an early marker of hemodynamic compromise, further large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to validate its predictive value and clinical utility in guiding trauma resuscitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18241","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection of reduced stroke volume (SV) or cardiac output (CO) may expedite resuscitative interventions during traumatic hemorrhage; corrected carotid artery flow time (ccFT) has been proposed as a surrogate for SV during blood volume loss.

Study design and methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the feasibility of using a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound capable of measuring ccFT in traumatically injured patients at a level 1 trauma center. A convenience sample of 33 patients was enrolled. We assessed device placement, data transfer and capture, and signal quality by assessing the ability to capture at least 15 consecutive cardiac cycles in the minute prior to blood pressure monitor cycling. A post hoc analysis examined ccFT variations between transfused and non-transfused patients.

Results: Device placement succeeded in 94% of patients (n = 31) and the data were captured and transferred from all 31. The consecutive cardiac cycles before blood pressure measurement exceeded 15 (p = .015) in 93% of patients (n = 28). We observed ccFT below 270 ms and longer time spent under this threshold during resuscitation in transfused patients. Patients with low ccFT experienced more severe injuries and longer hospital and ICU stays.

Discussion: This is the first study that demonstrates the feasibility of using a wearable Doppler ultrasound in trauma patients on admission to the trauma bay. Although findings suggest that ccFT could serve as an early marker of hemodynamic compromise, further large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to validate its predictive value and clinical utility in guiding trauma resuscitation.

无线、可穿戴式多普勒超声监测创伤患者的可行性。
背景:早期发现卒中容量减少(SV)或心输出量减少(CO)可以加快创伤性出血期间的复苏干预;校正颈动脉血流时间(ccFT)已被提议作为失血量期间SV的替代指标。研究设计和方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以评估在一级创伤中心使用能够测量创伤性损伤患者ccFT的无线可穿戴多普勒超声的可行性。纳入了33名患者的方便样本。我们通过评估在血压监测仪循环前一分钟内捕获至少15个连续心脏周期的能力来评估设备放置、数据传输和捕获以及信号质量。事后分析检查了输血患者和未输血患者之间的ccFT差异。结果:94%的患者(n = 31)植入器械成功,所有31例患者的数据均被捕获和转移。93%的患者(n = 28)测血压前连续心动周期超过15次(p = 0.015)。我们观察到输血患者在复苏过程中ccFT低于270 ms,并且在该阈值下花费的时间更长。ccFT低的患者损伤更严重,住院和ICU的时间更长。讨论:这是第一个证明在创伤患者入院时使用可穿戴多普勒超声的可行性的研究。虽然研究结果表明ccFT可以作为血流动力学损伤的早期标志,但需要进一步的大规模、多中心研究来验证其预测价值和指导创伤复苏的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信