Neonatal trauma resuscitation: Successful use of low-titer O+ whole blood in a 4-day-old infant with hemorrhagic shock.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1111/trf.18233
Renee W Green, Bryan A Cotton
{"title":"Neonatal trauma resuscitation: Successful use of low-titer O+ whole blood in a 4-day-old infant with hemorrhagic shock.","authors":"Renee W Green, Bryan A Cotton","doi":"10.1111/trf.18233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal trauma resuscitation is particularly challenging in cases of profound hemorrhagic shock. Low-titer group O+ whole blood (LTOWB+) has emerged as a potentially effective option in pediatric trauma, but its use in neonates is debated due to risks such as D-alloimmunization. In life-threatening emergencies, decisions must carefully balance immediate survival benefits against long-term risks.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We present a case report of a 4-day-old neonate transported as a Level 1 trauma following a dog attack to the head, resulting in hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest. Upon arrival to the trauma bay, the patient was pulseless, with unsuccessful intraosseous and intravenous vascular access attempts. Access was eventually achieved using an umbilical venous catheter, enabling administration of LTOWB+.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Administration of LTOWB+ resulted in the return of spontaneous circulation, improved perfusion, and hemodynamic stabilization. The patient remained alive at the 6-month follow-up. LTOWB+ facilitated rapid correction of hemorrhagic shock with no immediate complications observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case underscores the challenges of neonatal trauma resuscitation, including vascular access and the use of LTOWB+. LTOWB+ proved lifesaving, enabling rapid correction of acidosis and an improved outcome. Although concerns persist regarding LTOWB+ administration, the immediate survival benefits outweigh the risks, supported by evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. This case highlights the need for adaptability and a systematic approach to managing complex neonatal trauma scenarios. We argue that LTOWB+ is poised to become a pillar of pediatric resuscitation, providing a lifesaving, efficient, and safe option even in the newborn.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal trauma resuscitation is particularly challenging in cases of profound hemorrhagic shock. Low-titer group O+ whole blood (LTOWB+) has emerged as a potentially effective option in pediatric trauma, but its use in neonates is debated due to risks such as D-alloimmunization. In life-threatening emergencies, decisions must carefully balance immediate survival benefits against long-term risks.

Study design and methods: We present a case report of a 4-day-old neonate transported as a Level 1 trauma following a dog attack to the head, resulting in hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest. Upon arrival to the trauma bay, the patient was pulseless, with unsuccessful intraosseous and intravenous vascular access attempts. Access was eventually achieved using an umbilical venous catheter, enabling administration of LTOWB+.

Results: Administration of LTOWB+ resulted in the return of spontaneous circulation, improved perfusion, and hemodynamic stabilization. The patient remained alive at the 6-month follow-up. LTOWB+ facilitated rapid correction of hemorrhagic shock with no immediate complications observed.

Discussion: This case underscores the challenges of neonatal trauma resuscitation, including vascular access and the use of LTOWB+. LTOWB+ proved lifesaving, enabling rapid correction of acidosis and an improved outcome. Although concerns persist regarding LTOWB+ administration, the immediate survival benefits outweigh the risks, supported by evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. This case highlights the need for adaptability and a systematic approach to managing complex neonatal trauma scenarios. We argue that LTOWB+ is poised to become a pillar of pediatric resuscitation, providing a lifesaving, efficient, and safe option even in the newborn.

新生儿创伤复苏:低滴度O+全血成功应用于4日龄失血性休克婴儿。
背景:新生儿创伤复苏在严重失血性休克的情况下尤其具有挑战性。低滴度 O+ 群全血(LTOWB+)已成为治疗儿科创伤的一种潜在有效方法,但由于存在 D-异体免疫等风险,在新生儿中使用这种方法还存在争议。在危及生命的紧急情况下,必须慎重权衡即时生存效益与长期风险:我们报告了一例 4 天大的新生儿因头部被狗咬伤,导致失血性休克和心跳骤停而被送往一级创伤医院的病例。到达创伤室时,患者已无脉搏,尝试骨内和静脉血管通路均未成功。最终使用脐静脉导管实现了血管通路,并注射了LTOWB+:结果:使用 LTOWB+ 后,患者恢复了自主循环,血流灌注得到改善,血流动力学趋于稳定。患者在 6 个月的随访中仍然存活。LTOWB+有助于快速纠正失血性休克,且未观察到直接并发症:讨论:该病例强调了新生儿创伤复苏所面临的挑战,包括血管通路和 LTOWB+ 的使用。事实证明,LTOWB+ 挽救了生命,迅速纠正了酸中毒,改善了预后。尽管人们对使用 LTOWB+ 仍有顾虑,但在证明其有效性和安全性的证据支持下,即时存活的益处超过了风险。本病例突出表明,在处理复杂的新生儿创伤情况时,需要适应性和系统性的方法。我们认为,LTOWB+ 将成为儿科复苏的支柱,甚至为新生儿提供救生、高效和安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信