The influence of information processing speed on memory processes in patients with relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Carolin Balloff, Sven G Meuth, Heinz Wiendl, Andreas Johnen, Jens Bölte, Iris-Katharina Penner, Nils C Landmeyer
{"title":"The influence of information processing speed on memory processes in patients with relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Carolin Balloff, Sven G Meuth, Heinz Wiendl, Andreas Johnen, Jens Bölte, Iris-Katharina Penner, Nils C Landmeyer","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-96181-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Slowed information processing speed (IPS) is the primary cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although it is known to affect memory processes, the relationships between verbal learning (VL), verbal memory (VM) and IPS in different phenotypes of multiple sclerosis (MS) remain underexplored. This bicentric study aimed to investigate in detail IPS, VL, and VM as well as the relationships between these cognitive domains in a large sample of 92 pwMS (61 with early relapsing-remitting MS (pwRRMS), 31 with primary-progressive MS (pwPPMS)) and 61 age-matched healthy controls (HC). Compared with HC, pwPPMS performed significantly worse on all cognitive measures, whereas pwRRMS performed worse than HC only on IPS and VL. Irrespective of phenotype, IPS impairment emerged as the core cognitive deficit in MS, affecting 25% of the RRMS group and 45% of the PPMS group. PwRRMS outperformed pwPPMS in all domains, with the most pronounced differences observed in VL. Isolated VL or VM impairments were rare, as most pwMS with these deficits also had concurrent IPS impairment. PwPPMS had significantly higher rates of IPS and VL impairment than pwRRMS, but not in VM. Regression analyses showed that IPS significantly predicted both VL and VM performance in both MS groups. In HC, IPS was only associated with VL performance, hinting at different cognitive mechanisms underlying the performance in this domain. This study provides evidence that pwPPMS experience more pronounced cognitive changes in IPS and VL compared to pwRRMS. It also highlights the pervasive impact of IPS on VL and VM performance in both subtypes, underscoring the importance of IPS-focused interventions in the management of MS-related cognitive dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11978"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96181-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slowed information processing speed (IPS) is the primary cognitive impairment in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although it is known to affect memory processes, the relationships between verbal learning (VL), verbal memory (VM) and IPS in different phenotypes of multiple sclerosis (MS) remain underexplored. This bicentric study aimed to investigate in detail IPS, VL, and VM as well as the relationships between these cognitive domains in a large sample of 92 pwMS (61 with early relapsing-remitting MS (pwRRMS), 31 with primary-progressive MS (pwPPMS)) and 61 age-matched healthy controls (HC). Compared with HC, pwPPMS performed significantly worse on all cognitive measures, whereas pwRRMS performed worse than HC only on IPS and VL. Irrespective of phenotype, IPS impairment emerged as the core cognitive deficit in MS, affecting 25% of the RRMS group and 45% of the PPMS group. PwRRMS outperformed pwPPMS in all domains, with the most pronounced differences observed in VL. Isolated VL or VM impairments were rare, as most pwMS with these deficits also had concurrent IPS impairment. PwPPMS had significantly higher rates of IPS and VL impairment than pwRRMS, but not in VM. Regression analyses showed that IPS significantly predicted both VL and VM performance in both MS groups. In HC, IPS was only associated with VL performance, hinting at different cognitive mechanisms underlying the performance in this domain. This study provides evidence that pwPPMS experience more pronounced cognitive changes in IPS and VL compared to pwRRMS. It also highlights the pervasive impact of IPS on VL and VM performance in both subtypes, underscoring the importance of IPS-focused interventions in the management of MS-related cognitive dysfunction.

信息处理速度对复发缓解型和原发性进行性多发性硬化患者记忆过程的影响。
信息处理速度减慢是多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者的主要认知障碍。虽然已知言语学习(VL)、言语记忆(VM)和IPS在不同表型多发性硬化症(MS)中影响记忆过程,但它们之间的关系尚不清楚。这项双中心研究旨在详细研究IPS、VL和VM以及这些认知领域之间的关系,研究对象包括92名pwMS患者(61名早期复发缓解型MS (pwRRMS), 31名原发性进展型MS (pwPPMS))和61名年龄匹配的健康对照(HC)。与HC相比,pwPPMS在所有认知测试中的表现都明显差于HC,而pwRRMS仅在IPS和VL上表现差于HC。无论表型如何,IPS损伤成为MS的核心认知缺陷,影响25%的RRMS组和45%的PPMS组。PwRRMS在所有领域都优于pwPPMS,在VL中观察到最明显的差异。孤立的VL或VM损伤是罕见的,因为大多数有这些缺陷的pwMS同时也有IPS损伤。PwPPMS的IPS和VL损伤率显著高于pwRRMS,而VM无此差异。回归分析显示,IPS能显著预测两组MS患者的VL和VM性能。在HC中,IPS仅与VL表现相关,暗示在这一领域的表现背后存在不同的认知机制。本研究提供的证据表明,与pwRRMS相比,pwPPMS在IPS和VL方面经历了更明显的认知变化。该研究还强调了IPS对两种亚型的VL和VM性能的普遍影响,强调了以IPS为重点的干预措施在ms相关认知功能障碍管理中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信