Neural insights on expert surgeons' mental workload during live robotic surgeries.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Chiho Lim, Marian Obuseh, Jackie Cha, James Steward, Chandru Sundaram, Denny Yu
{"title":"Neural insights on expert surgeons' mental workload during live robotic surgeries.","authors":"Chiho Lim, Marian Obuseh, Jackie Cha, James Steward, Chandru Sundaram, Denny Yu","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-96064-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its adoption and benefits, robotic surgeries can impose additional mental workload on surgeons. Validated questionnaires mostly administered at the end of procedures may not accurately capture the dynamic nature of mental workload over an entire procedure. Hence, we sought to determine if electroencephalogram (EEG) based neural activities in different brain regions can measure variations in expert surgeons' mental workload intraoperatively. EEG data was collected from five different surgeons performing 13 robotic-assisted urological procedures. Data analysis focused on three surgery phases (before, critical, and after). After performing each phase, surgeons provided a rating of their perceived mental workload. A linear mixed effects model was applied to explore the impact of the study phases on the relative spectral band power of EEG signals. The relative theta band power in the frontal brain region was highest during the critical portions of the procedure (p < 0.05). As the subjective ratings increased, the relative frontal theta band power increased (p < 0.001) while the relative parietal alpha band power decreased across all phases. We show that EEG signals can distinguish intraoperative workload in robotic surgeries. This has several applications including predicting risk factors for increased case complexity and surgical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"12073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96064-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its adoption and benefits, robotic surgeries can impose additional mental workload on surgeons. Validated questionnaires mostly administered at the end of procedures may not accurately capture the dynamic nature of mental workload over an entire procedure. Hence, we sought to determine if electroencephalogram (EEG) based neural activities in different brain regions can measure variations in expert surgeons' mental workload intraoperatively. EEG data was collected from five different surgeons performing 13 robotic-assisted urological procedures. Data analysis focused on three surgery phases (before, critical, and after). After performing each phase, surgeons provided a rating of their perceived mental workload. A linear mixed effects model was applied to explore the impact of the study phases on the relative spectral band power of EEG signals. The relative theta band power in the frontal brain region was highest during the critical portions of the procedure (p < 0.05). As the subjective ratings increased, the relative frontal theta band power increased (p < 0.001) while the relative parietal alpha band power decreased across all phases. We show that EEG signals can distinguish intraoperative workload in robotic surgeries. This has several applications including predicting risk factors for increased case complexity and surgical education.

从神经角度洞察专家外科医生在实时机器人手术中的脑力劳动负荷。
尽管机器人手术被广泛采用并带来诸多益处,但它仍会给外科医生带来额外的脑力劳动负担。经过验证的调查问卷大多在手术结束时进行,可能无法准确捕捉整个手术过程中脑力劳动负荷的动态性质。因此,我们试图确定基于脑电图(EEG)的不同脑区神经活动是否能测量专家外科医生术中心理工作量的变化。我们收集了五位不同外科医生的脑电图数据,他们共进行了 13 例机器人辅助泌尿外科手术。数据分析集中在三个手术阶段(术前、关键和术后)。在完成每个阶段的手术后,外科医生对其感知到的心理工作量进行评分。研究人员采用线性混合效应模型来探讨研究阶段对脑电图信号相对频带功率的影响。在手术的关键部分,额叶脑区的相对θ波段功率最高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信