FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement analysis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using DNA/RNA-based NGS and FISH.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Xin Zhang, Qianming Bai, Yulin Wang, Zhengzeng Jiang, Jing Han, Cheng Xue, Kai Huang, Lijuan Luan, Xiaoyong Huang, Xiaowu Huang, Guoming Shi, Yingyong Hou, Yuan Ji
{"title":"FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement analysis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using DNA/RNA-based NGS and FISH.","authors":"Xin Zhang, Qianming Bai, Yulin Wang, Zhengzeng Jiang, Jing Han, Cheng Xue, Kai Huang, Lijuan Luan, Xiaoyong Huang, Xiaowu Huang, Guoming Shi, Yingyong Hou, Yuan Ji","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04067-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement benefit from targeted therapies, highlighting the need for reliable testing strategies to identify FGFR2 alterations. We assessed 226 iCCA cases using RNA-based NGS, DNA-based NGS, and break-apart FISH to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods in detecting FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement. The detection rates for FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement were 9.7% (22/226) for RNA-based NGS, 7.1% (16/226) for DNA-based NGS, and 10.2% (23/226) for FISH. Among the 26 FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive cases identified by any method, only 15 (57.7%) were positive by all three techniques, yielding a concordance rate of 95.1% (215/226). RNA-based NGS confirmed oncogenic FGFR2 fusion in 81% (21/26) of positive cases and identified five novel oncogenic fusions. Thirty-five percent (6/17) of the partner genes were located on chromosome 10, with BICC1 being the most common fusion partner, while the rest were distributed across the other 9 chromosomes. FISH demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.2% and specificity of 98.5%, compared to oncogenic FGFR2 fusions confirmed by RNA-based NGS, while DNA-based NGS exhibited a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 99.5%, identifying FGFR2 mutations in 4 cases. FGFR2-FISH positive cases displayed no significant heterogeneity in positive cell distribution. Oncogenic FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement was associated with small duct type iCCA, especially in cases with positive serum HBsAg and absent cholangiolocarcinoma components and peripheral liver steatosis. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of three assays for detecting FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement, along with clinicopathologic characterization of oncogenic FGFR2 fusion in iCCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04067-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement benefit from targeted therapies, highlighting the need for reliable testing strategies to identify FGFR2 alterations. We assessed 226 iCCA cases using RNA-based NGS, DNA-based NGS, and break-apart FISH to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods in detecting FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement. The detection rates for FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement were 9.7% (22/226) for RNA-based NGS, 7.1% (16/226) for DNA-based NGS, and 10.2% (23/226) for FISH. Among the 26 FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive cases identified by any method, only 15 (57.7%) were positive by all three techniques, yielding a concordance rate of 95.1% (215/226). RNA-based NGS confirmed oncogenic FGFR2 fusion in 81% (21/26) of positive cases and identified five novel oncogenic fusions. Thirty-five percent (6/17) of the partner genes were located on chromosome 10, with BICC1 being the most common fusion partner, while the rest were distributed across the other 9 chromosomes. FISH demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.2% and specificity of 98.5%, compared to oncogenic FGFR2 fusions confirmed by RNA-based NGS, while DNA-based NGS exhibited a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 99.5%, identifying FGFR2 mutations in 4 cases. FGFR2-FISH positive cases displayed no significant heterogeneity in positive cell distribution. Oncogenic FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement was associated with small duct type iCCA, especially in cases with positive serum HBsAg and absent cholangiolocarcinoma components and peripheral liver steatosis. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of three assays for detecting FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement, along with clinicopathologic characterization of oncogenic FGFR2 fusion in iCCA.

携带 FGFR2 融合/重排的肝内胆管癌(iCCA)患者可从靶向治疗中获益,这凸显了对可靠检测策略的需求,以确定 FGFR2 的改变。我们使用基于 RNA 的 NGS、基于 DNA 的 NGS 和断裂 FISH 对 226 例 iCCA 病例进行了评估,以评价这些方法在检测 FGFR2 融合/重排方面的有效性。基于 RNA 的 NGS 对 FGFR2 融合/重排的检出率为 9.7%(22/226),基于 DNA 的 NGS 为 7.1%(16/226),FISH 为 10.2%(23/226)。在任何一种方法鉴定出的 26 例 FGFR2 融合/重排阳性病例中,只有 15 例(57.7%)三种技术均为阳性,吻合率为 95.1%(215/226)。基于 RNA 的 NGS 在 81% 的阳性病例(21/26)中证实了致癌 FGFR2 融合,并发现了五例新的致癌融合。35%(6/17)的伙伴基因位于 10 号染色体上,其中 BICC1 是最常见的融合伙伴基因,其余基因则分布在其他 9 条染色体上。与基于 RNA 的 NGS 证实的致癌 FGFR2 融合相比,FISH 的灵敏度为 95.2%,特异性为 98.5%;而基于 DNA 的 NGS 的灵敏度为 71.4%,特异性为 99.5%,在 4 个病例中发现了 FGFR2 突变。FGFR2-FISH 阳性病例的阳性细胞分布无明显异质性。致癌 FGFR2 融合/重排与小导管型 iCCA 相关,尤其是在血清 HBsAg 阳性、无胆管癌成分和外周肝脂肪变性的病例中。本研究对检测 FGFR2 融合/重排的三种检测方法以及 iCCA 中致癌 FGFR2 融合的临床病理特征进行了全面比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信