Pulmonary Embolism Survival Prediction Using Multimodal Learning Based on Computed Tomography Angiography and Clinical Data.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhusi Zhong, Helen Zhang, Fayez H Fayad, Andrew C Lancaster, John Sollee, Shreyas Kulkarni, Cheng Ting Lin, Jie Li, Xinbo Gao, Scott Collins, Colin F Greineder, Sun H Ahn, Harrison X Bai, Zhicheng Jiao, Michael K Atalay
{"title":"Pulmonary Embolism Survival Prediction Using Multimodal Learning Based on Computed Tomography Angiography and Clinical Data.","authors":"Zhusi Zhong, Helen Zhang, Fayez H Fayad, Andrew C Lancaster, John Sollee, Shreyas Kulkarni, Cheng Ting Lin, Jie Li, Xinbo Gao, Scott Collins, Colin F Greineder, Sun H Ahn, Harrison X Bai, Zhicheng Jiao, Michael K Atalay","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of mortality in the United States. The objective of this study is to implement deep learning (DL) models using computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), clinical data, and PE Severity Index (PESI) scores to predict PE survival.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 918 patients (median age 64 y, range 13 to 99 y, 48% male) with 3978 CTPAs were identified via retrospective review across 3 institutions. To predict survival, an AI model was used to extract disease-related imaging features from CTPAs. Imaging features and clinical variables were then incorporated into independent DL models to predict survival outcomes. Cross-modal fusion CoxPH models were used to develop multimodal models from combinations of DL models and calculated PESI scores. Five multimodal models were developed as follows: (1) using CTPA imaging features only, (2) using clinical variables only, (3) using both CTPA and clinical variables, (4) using CTPA and PESI score, and (5) using CTPA, clinical variables, and PESI score. Performance was evaluated using the concordance index (c-index). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Additional factor-risk analysis was conducted to account for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both data sets, the multimodal models incorporating CTPA features, clinical variables, and PESI score achieved higher c-indices than PESI alone. Following the stratification of patients into high-risk and low-risk groups by models, survival outcomes differed significantly (both P<0.001). A strong correlation was found between high-risk grouping and RV dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiomic DL models incorporating CTPA features, clinical data, and PESI achieved higher c-indices than PESI alone for PE survival prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of mortality in the United States. The objective of this study is to implement deep learning (DL) models using computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), clinical data, and PE Severity Index (PESI) scores to predict PE survival.

Materials and methods: In total, 918 patients (median age 64 y, range 13 to 99 y, 48% male) with 3978 CTPAs were identified via retrospective review across 3 institutions. To predict survival, an AI model was used to extract disease-related imaging features from CTPAs. Imaging features and clinical variables were then incorporated into independent DL models to predict survival outcomes. Cross-modal fusion CoxPH models were used to develop multimodal models from combinations of DL models and calculated PESI scores. Five multimodal models were developed as follows: (1) using CTPA imaging features only, (2) using clinical variables only, (3) using both CTPA and clinical variables, (4) using CTPA and PESI score, and (5) using CTPA, clinical variables, and PESI score. Performance was evaluated using the concordance index (c-index). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Additional factor-risk analysis was conducted to account for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction.

Results: For both data sets, the multimodal models incorporating CTPA features, clinical variables, and PESI score achieved higher c-indices than PESI alone. Following the stratification of patients into high-risk and low-risk groups by models, survival outcomes differed significantly (both P<0.001). A strong correlation was found between high-risk grouping and RV dysfunction.

Conclusions: Multiomic DL models incorporating CTPA features, clinical data, and PESI achieved higher c-indices than PESI alone for PE survival prediction.

基于计算机断层血管造影和临床数据的肺栓塞生存预测的多模式学习。
目的:肺栓塞(PE)是美国死亡的一个重要原因。本研究的目的是利用计算机断层扫描肺血管造影(CTPA)、临床数据和PE严重程度指数(PESI)评分来实现深度学习(DL)模型,以预测PE的生存。材料和方法:通过3家机构的回顾性研究,共发现918例患者(中位年龄64岁,范围13 - 99岁,男性48%)3978例ctpa。为了预测生存率,使用人工智能模型从ctpa中提取疾病相关的成像特征。然后将影像学特征和临床变量纳入独立的DL模型以预测生存结果。使用跨模态融合cox - ph模型从DL模型和计算的PESI分数的组合中建立多模态模型。建立了以下五种多模态模型:(1)仅使用CTPA成像特征,(2)仅使用临床变量,(3)同时使用CTPA和临床变量,(4)使用CTPA和PESI评分,(5)使用CTPA,临床变量和PESI评分。使用一致性指数(c-index)评估表现。Kaplan-Meier分析将患者分为高危组和低危组。进行了额外的因素风险分析,以解释右心室功能障碍。结果:对于这两个数据集,结合CTPA特征、临床变量和PESI评分的多模态模型的c指数高于单独的PESI。通过模型将患者分为高风险组和低风险组后,生存结果存在显著差异(p)。结论:结合CTPA特征、临床数据和PESI的Multiomic DL模型在PE生存预测方面的c指数高于单独的PESI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信