Comparison of the Efficacy of Ureteroscopy through a Flexible Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath with Tubeless-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Calculi.
Guanyun Deng, Kehua Jiang, Qing Wang, Wenbing Lu, Kunyuan Huang, Fa Sun
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Ureteroscopy through a Flexible Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath with Tubeless-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Calculi.","authors":"Guanyun Deng, Kehua Jiang, Qing Wang, Wenbing Lu, Kunyuan Huang, Fa Sun","doi":"10.22037/uj.v22i.8368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of the flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS) combined with disposable flexible ureteroscope (FURS) versus tubeless-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy(T-PCNL) in the treatment of renal calculi with a diameter of 2-3 cm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 270 patients of renal calculi with a maximum diameter of 2-3 cm treated between January 2022 to July 2024. Of these, 146 cases were treated with single use ureteroscopic lithotripsy through a FV-UAS while 124 cases were treated by tubeless PCNL (T-PCNL group) through 16F amplatz sheath. Perioperative indicators and postoperative stone-free rates (SFR) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the stone free rates(SFRs) between the two surgical methods. Using the criterion of a residual kidney stone diameter less than 4 mm, the SFRs at 3 days postoperatively were compared between the two groups: 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-2.28, odds ratio (OR) = 1.13, P = .724; the SFRs at 1 month postoperatively were compared: 95% CI: 0.417-2.60, OR = 1.041, P = .931. Using the criterion of a residual kidney stone diameter less than 2 mm, the SFRs at 3 days postoperatively were compared between the two groups: 95% CI: 0.355-1.055, OR = 0.612, P = .076; the SFRs at 1 month postoperatively were compared: 95% CI: 0.374-1.320, OR =.703, P = .271. There was no significant difference in the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the need for postoperative analgesia between the two groups (P=0.813, P=0.839, respectively). The surgical duration in the FV-UAS group was significantly longer (P<0.001). The decrease in postoperative hemoglobin(Hb) levels and hospital stay in the FV-UAS group were significantly lower than those in the T-PCNL group (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For treating 2-3 cm renal calculi, both FV-UAS with disposable ureteroscope and 16F tubeless PCNL yield high stone-free rates. FV-UAS-assisted FURS reduces bleeding and hospital stay, whereas 16F tubeless PCNL shortens surgery duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of the flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS) combined with disposable flexible ureteroscope (FURS) versus tubeless-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy(T-PCNL) in the treatment of renal calculi with a diameter of 2-3 cm.
Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis included 270 patients of renal calculi with a maximum diameter of 2-3 cm treated between January 2022 to July 2024. Of these, 146 cases were treated with single use ureteroscopic lithotripsy through a FV-UAS while 124 cases were treated by tubeless PCNL (T-PCNL group) through 16F amplatz sheath. Perioperative indicators and postoperative stone-free rates (SFR) were compared.
Results: There was no significant difference in the stone free rates(SFRs) between the two surgical methods. Using the criterion of a residual kidney stone diameter less than 4 mm, the SFRs at 3 days postoperatively were compared between the two groups: 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-2.28, odds ratio (OR) = 1.13, P = .724; the SFRs at 1 month postoperatively were compared: 95% CI: 0.417-2.60, OR = 1.041, P = .931. Using the criterion of a residual kidney stone diameter less than 2 mm, the SFRs at 3 days postoperatively were compared between the two groups: 95% CI: 0.355-1.055, OR = 0.612, P = .076; the SFRs at 1 month postoperatively were compared: 95% CI: 0.374-1.320, OR =.703, P = .271. There was no significant difference in the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the need for postoperative analgesia between the two groups (P=0.813, P=0.839, respectively). The surgical duration in the FV-UAS group was significantly longer (P<0.001). The decrease in postoperative hemoglobin(Hb) levels and hospital stay in the FV-UAS group were significantly lower than those in the T-PCNL group (P<0.001).
Conclusion: For treating 2-3 cm renal calculi, both FV-UAS with disposable ureteroscope and 16F tubeless PCNL yield high stone-free rates. FV-UAS-assisted FURS reduces bleeding and hospital stay, whereas 16F tubeless PCNL shortens surgery duration.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist.
Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.