Symptom Subtypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea 10 Years Later: Past, Present and Future.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaf082
Brendan T Keenan, Lichuan Ye, Grace W Pien, Ulysses J Magalang, Bryndis Benediktsdottir, Thorarinn Gislason, Allan I Pack
{"title":"Symptom Subtypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea 10 Years Later: Past, Present and Future.","authors":"Brendan T Keenan, Lichuan Ye, Grace W Pien, Ulysses J Magalang, Bryndis Benediktsdottir, Thorarinn Gislason, Allan I Pack","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As first described in Iceland over 10 years ago and since replicated across thousands of diverse subjects from community-based and clinical cohorts throughout the world, there exist different subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) characterized by patient-reported symptoms. Subtypes defined by excessive sleepiness, disturbed sleep, and minimal symptoms have been consistently identified across these various cohorts, and are often joined by a moderately sleepy subtype. Identifying symptom subtypes using cluster analysis provided a data-driven approach to formalize the concept of symptomatic differences among patients with OSA that has been discussed for decades in prior research, and has important implications for future research and clinical applications. Current evidence favors excessive sleepiness as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk related to OSA, but there remains an opportunity for more research on non-cardiovascular endpoints. The framework of symptom subtypes can inform future randomized clinical trials, which are challenging in patients with excessive sleepiness, but both feasible and clinically important in the other subtypes. Symptom heterogeneity should also be used to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach to treatment recommendations, including consideration of whether patients with minimally symptomatic OSA require or receive any benefits from therapy. Studies to identify the underlying mechanisms of different symptom presentations, demonstrate short-term reliability, determine the minimum number of questions required for accurate identification, and implement a tool for assigning subtypes in routine clinical practice are needed in order to realize the full potential of symptom subtypes to inform more personalized medicine approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As first described in Iceland over 10 years ago and since replicated across thousands of diverse subjects from community-based and clinical cohorts throughout the world, there exist different subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) characterized by patient-reported symptoms. Subtypes defined by excessive sleepiness, disturbed sleep, and minimal symptoms have been consistently identified across these various cohorts, and are often joined by a moderately sleepy subtype. Identifying symptom subtypes using cluster analysis provided a data-driven approach to formalize the concept of symptomatic differences among patients with OSA that has been discussed for decades in prior research, and has important implications for future research and clinical applications. Current evidence favors excessive sleepiness as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk related to OSA, but there remains an opportunity for more research on non-cardiovascular endpoints. The framework of symptom subtypes can inform future randomized clinical trials, which are challenging in patients with excessive sleepiness, but both feasible and clinically important in the other subtypes. Symptom heterogeneity should also be used to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach to treatment recommendations, including consideration of whether patients with minimally symptomatic OSA require or receive any benefits from therapy. Studies to identify the underlying mechanisms of different symptom presentations, demonstrate short-term reliability, determine the minimum number of questions required for accurate identification, and implement a tool for assigning subtypes in routine clinical practice are needed in order to realize the full potential of symptom subtypes to inform more personalized medicine approaches.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信