Brendan T Keenan, Lichuan Ye, Grace W Pien, Ulysses J Magalang, Bryndis Benediktsdottir, Thorarinn Gislason, Allan I Pack
{"title":"Symptom Subtypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea 10 Years Later: Past, Present and Future.","authors":"Brendan T Keenan, Lichuan Ye, Grace W Pien, Ulysses J Magalang, Bryndis Benediktsdottir, Thorarinn Gislason, Allan I Pack","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As first described in Iceland over 10 years ago and since replicated across thousands of diverse subjects from community-based and clinical cohorts throughout the world, there exist different subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) characterized by patient-reported symptoms. Subtypes defined by excessive sleepiness, disturbed sleep, and minimal symptoms have been consistently identified across these various cohorts, and are often joined by a moderately sleepy subtype. Identifying symptom subtypes using cluster analysis provided a data-driven approach to formalize the concept of symptomatic differences among patients with OSA that has been discussed for decades in prior research, and has important implications for future research and clinical applications. Current evidence favors excessive sleepiness as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk related to OSA, but there remains an opportunity for more research on non-cardiovascular endpoints. The framework of symptom subtypes can inform future randomized clinical trials, which are challenging in patients with excessive sleepiness, but both feasible and clinically important in the other subtypes. Symptom heterogeneity should also be used to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach to treatment recommendations, including consideration of whether patients with minimally symptomatic OSA require or receive any benefits from therapy. Studies to identify the underlying mechanisms of different symptom presentations, demonstrate short-term reliability, determine the minimum number of questions required for accurate identification, and implement a tool for assigning subtypes in routine clinical practice are needed in order to realize the full potential of symptom subtypes to inform more personalized medicine approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As first described in Iceland over 10 years ago and since replicated across thousands of diverse subjects from community-based and clinical cohorts throughout the world, there exist different subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) characterized by patient-reported symptoms. Subtypes defined by excessive sleepiness, disturbed sleep, and minimal symptoms have been consistently identified across these various cohorts, and are often joined by a moderately sleepy subtype. Identifying symptom subtypes using cluster analysis provided a data-driven approach to formalize the concept of symptomatic differences among patients with OSA that has been discussed for decades in prior research, and has important implications for future research and clinical applications. Current evidence favors excessive sleepiness as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk related to OSA, but there remains an opportunity for more research on non-cardiovascular endpoints. The framework of symptom subtypes can inform future randomized clinical trials, which are challenging in patients with excessive sleepiness, but both feasible and clinically important in the other subtypes. Symptom heterogeneity should also be used to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach to treatment recommendations, including consideration of whether patients with minimally symptomatic OSA require or receive any benefits from therapy. Studies to identify the underlying mechanisms of different symptom presentations, demonstrate short-term reliability, determine the minimum number of questions required for accurate identification, and implement a tool for assigning subtypes in routine clinical practice are needed in order to realize the full potential of symptom subtypes to inform more personalized medicine approaches.
期刊介绍:
SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including:
Genes
Molecules
Cells
Physiology
Neural systems and circuits
Behavior and cognition
Self-report
SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to:
Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms
In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders
Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms
Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease
Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.