Aerodynamic analysis and ANN-based optimization of NACA airfoils for enhanced UAV performance.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Sanan H Khan, Mohd Danish, Md Ayaz, Afsar Husain, Shamma Saeed, Shamma Abdulla, Shama Shaheen, Alia Saeed, Ahmed Thaher
{"title":"Aerodynamic analysis and ANN-based optimization of NACA airfoils for enhanced UAV performance.","authors":"Sanan H Khan, Mohd Danish, Md Ayaz, Afsar Husain, Shamma Saeed, Shamma Abdulla, Shama Shaheen, Alia Saeed, Ahmed Thaher","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-95848-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is strongly dependent on the design of their airfoils, particularly in applications necessitating high maneuverability, stability, and efficiency. This study analyzed three National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) airfoil profiles: NACA 2412, NACA 4415, and NACA 0012, using a combination of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), XFOIL simulations, and a hybrid artificial neural network-genetic algorithm (ANN-GA) model. This study aimed to evaluate and optimize the aerodynamic performance of these airfoils under various flight conditions. Through CFD simulations and XFOIL analysis, we explored the lift, drag, and stall characteristics of each airfoil at different angles of attack and Reynolds numbers. The NACA 4415 airfoil consistently outperformed the others, achieving the highest lift-to-drag ratio ([Formula: see text]) and exhibiting favorable stall behavior. Thus, it is particularly well-suited for UAVs operating in challenging environments. Further, streamline and velocity profile analyses confirmed that NACA 4415 exhibited a smooth airflow and delayed flow separation, thereby contributing to its superior aerodynamic efficiency. Using the hybrid ANN-GA model, we optimized key parameters, such as the angle of attack and Reynolds number with optimal values of [Formula: see text] and 770,801, respectively, for maximum efficiency. Additionally, the ANN model demonstrated a high accuracy in predicting the aerodynamic performance, closely matching the results of the CFD simulations. Overall, this study highlighted the potential of combining computational techniques and machine- learning models to optimize UAV airfoil designs. These findings offer valuable insights for improving the efficiency and agility of UAVs, particularly in industries such as precision agriculture, infrastructure inspection, and environmental monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11998"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95848-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is strongly dependent on the design of their airfoils, particularly in applications necessitating high maneuverability, stability, and efficiency. This study analyzed three National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) airfoil profiles: NACA 2412, NACA 4415, and NACA 0012, using a combination of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), XFOIL simulations, and a hybrid artificial neural network-genetic algorithm (ANN-GA) model. This study aimed to evaluate and optimize the aerodynamic performance of these airfoils under various flight conditions. Through CFD simulations and XFOIL analysis, we explored the lift, drag, and stall characteristics of each airfoil at different angles of attack and Reynolds numbers. The NACA 4415 airfoil consistently outperformed the others, achieving the highest lift-to-drag ratio ([Formula: see text]) and exhibiting favorable stall behavior. Thus, it is particularly well-suited for UAVs operating in challenging environments. Further, streamline and velocity profile analyses confirmed that NACA 4415 exhibited a smooth airflow and delayed flow separation, thereby contributing to its superior aerodynamic efficiency. Using the hybrid ANN-GA model, we optimized key parameters, such as the angle of attack and Reynolds number with optimal values of [Formula: see text] and 770,801, respectively, for maximum efficiency. Additionally, the ANN model demonstrated a high accuracy in predicting the aerodynamic performance, closely matching the results of the CFD simulations. Overall, this study highlighted the potential of combining computational techniques and machine- learning models to optimize UAV airfoil designs. These findings offer valuable insights for improving the efficiency and agility of UAVs, particularly in industries such as precision agriculture, infrastructure inspection, and environmental monitoring.

无人机NACA翼型气动分析及基于人工神经网络的优化。
无人驾驶飞行器(uav)的性能在很大程度上依赖于其翼型的设计,特别是在需要高机动性、稳定性和效率的应用中。本研究分析了三个国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)翼型剖面:NACA 2412, NACA 4415和NACA 0012,使用计算流体动力学(CFD), XFOIL模拟和混合人工神经网络遗传算法(ANN-GA)模型的组合。本研究旨在评估和优化这些翼型在各种飞行条件下的气动性能。通过CFD模拟和XFOIL分析,我们探索了不同迎角和雷诺数下每个翼型的升力、阻力和失速特性。NACA 4415翼型一贯优于其他,实现最高的升阻比(公式:见文本]),并表现出良好的失速行为。因此,它特别适合在具有挑战性的环境中操作的无人机。此外,流线和速度剖面分析证实,NACA 4415具有平滑的气流和延迟的流动分离,从而有助于其优越的气动效率。利用混合ANN-GA模型,我们优化了关键参数,如攻角和雷诺数,其最优值分别为[公式:见文]和770,801,以获得最大效率。此外,人工神经网络模型对气动性能的预测精度较高,与CFD模拟结果吻合较好。总的来说,这项研究强调了结合计算技术和机器学习模型来优化无人机翼型设计的潜力。这些发现为提高无人机的效率和敏捷性提供了有价值的见解,特别是在精准农业、基础设施检查和环境监测等行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信