Accuracy of CBCT with blooming artifact reduction filter on the measurements of dentin thickness in root canals with radiodense materials: an in vitro study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Odontology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s10266-025-01099-0
Diego Leonardo de Souza, Luiz Carlos de Lima Dias Junior, Elimar Fernando Bauer, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi
{"title":"Accuracy of CBCT with blooming artifact reduction filter on the measurements of dentin thickness in root canals with radiodense materials: an in vitro study.","authors":"Diego Leonardo de Souza, Luiz Carlos de Lima Dias Junior, Elimar Fernando Bauer, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi","doi":"10.1007/s10266-025-01099-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The precision of dentin thickness evaluations in the presence of artifacts is vital, as inaccuracies may increase the risk of over-preparation and consequent structural damage to the tooth. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of residual dentin thickness measurements in CBCT images of teeth with high-density intracanal materials, utilizing the blooming artifact reduction (BAR) filter. Twelve single-rooted human teeth were selected. Axial cuts were performed, and the root thickness was measured at the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces, which represented the reference standard. CBCT scans were acquired of each specimen in 5 different settings: empty root canals (ERC), gutta-percha cone (GPC), gutta-percha and endodontic sealer (GPC + S), fiberglass post (FGP), and metal post (MP). Measurements were performed before and after the application of the BAR filter in the e-vol DX software. ANOVA with the Dunnet's post hoc test was used for comparison between measurements in CBCT images and the reference standard. The BAR filter did not influence the measurements in teeth with ERC, GPC, and FGP (p > 0.05). In teeth with GPC + S, the measurements with the BAR filter had no difference from the reference standard (p < 0.05). CBCT images measurements were comparable to the reference standard in the ERC, GPC, and FGP groups. BAR filter was restricted to the GPC + S group in the cervical third, and the MP group in the apical third. In root canals with metal posts, the overall dentin thickness was significantly underestimated in all CBCT images within the cervical and middle thirds.</p>","PeriodicalId":19390,"journal":{"name":"Odontology","volume":" ","pages":"1712-1721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01099-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The precision of dentin thickness evaluations in the presence of artifacts is vital, as inaccuracies may increase the risk of over-preparation and consequent structural damage to the tooth. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of residual dentin thickness measurements in CBCT images of teeth with high-density intracanal materials, utilizing the blooming artifact reduction (BAR) filter. Twelve single-rooted human teeth were selected. Axial cuts were performed, and the root thickness was measured at the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces, which represented the reference standard. CBCT scans were acquired of each specimen in 5 different settings: empty root canals (ERC), gutta-percha cone (GPC), gutta-percha and endodontic sealer (GPC + S), fiberglass post (FGP), and metal post (MP). Measurements were performed before and after the application of the BAR filter in the e-vol DX software. ANOVA with the Dunnet's post hoc test was used for comparison between measurements in CBCT images and the reference standard. The BAR filter did not influence the measurements in teeth with ERC, GPC, and FGP (p > 0.05). In teeth with GPC + S, the measurements with the BAR filter had no difference from the reference standard (p < 0.05). CBCT images measurements were comparable to the reference standard in the ERC, GPC, and FGP groups. BAR filter was restricted to the GPC + S group in the cervical third, and the MP group in the apical third. In root canals with metal posts, the overall dentin thickness was significantly underestimated in all CBCT images within the cervical and middle thirds.

带盛开伪影滤波的CBCT在放射性致密材料根管内测量牙本质厚度的准确性:一项体外研究。
在人工制品存在的情况下,牙本质厚度评估的准确性是至关重要的,因为不准确可能会增加过度准备和随后对牙齿结构损伤的风险。本体外研究的目的是利用盛开伪影还原(BAR)滤波器评估高密度牙管内材料牙齿CBCT图像中残留牙本质厚度测量的准确性。选择了12颗单根人牙。进行轴向切牙,测量颊、舌、中、远面根的厚度,作为参考标准。在5种不同的设置下对每个标本进行CBCT扫描:空根管(ERC)、杜胶-percha cone (GPC)、杜胶-percha and根管密封剂(GPC + S)、玻璃纤维桩(FGP)和金属桩(MP)。在e-vol DX软件中应用BAR滤波器之前和之后进行测量。采用方差分析和Dunnet事后检验比较CBCT图像和参考标准的测量值。BAR过滤器对ERC、GPC和FGP牙齿的测量结果没有影响(p > 0.05)。在GPC + S牙中,BAR滤光器测量值与参比标准无显著性差异(p < 0.05)。在ERC、GPC和FGP组中,CBCT图像测量值与参考标准相当。BAR筛选仅限于宫颈三分之一的GPC + S组,根尖三分之一的MP组。在有金属桩的根管中,所有的CBCT图像都明显低估了颈椎和中三分之一的牙本质厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Odontology
Odontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Odontology covers all disciplines involved in the fields of dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics ranging from research on human dental pulp, to comparisons of analgesics in surgery, to analysis of biofilm properties of dental plaque.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信