On a Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach based on three frailty models.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Patcharaporn Porndumnernsawat, Till D Frank, Lily Ingsrisawang
{"title":"On a Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach based on three frailty models.","authors":"Patcharaporn Porndumnernsawat, Till D Frank, Lily Ingsrisawang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-96198-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the performance of the Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach constructed from extended Cox proportional hazard with gamma frailty term, and two shared gamma frailty models with exponential and Weibull baseline hazard function, respectively. A simulation study was applied to evaluate the impact of the baseline hazard function, number of clusters (200, 500, 1000), cluster size (5, 10, 20), and right censoring rate (10%, 50%, 80%) on the performance of classification. We generated 90 clustered survival datasets having correlated failure times and 50 covariates at cluster level and at individual level. Each dataset was resampling 1000 times by selecting clusters at random 70% as training datasets and the rest 30% as the test datasets. The performance of a Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach based on shared gamma frailty models with Weibull distribution provided the highest accuracy. All three models, the accuracy tended to increase with an increase in the cluster size and the number of clusters. The accuracy decreased monotonically with increasing the percentage of censoring rate. In conclusion, the use of the Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach constructed from the shared gamma frailty with baseline hazard function as Weibull distribution was recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"12017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96198-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the performance of the Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach constructed from extended Cox proportional hazard with gamma frailty term, and two shared gamma frailty models with exponential and Weibull baseline hazard function, respectively. A simulation study was applied to evaluate the impact of the baseline hazard function, number of clusters (200, 500, 1000), cluster size (5, 10, 20), and right censoring rate (10%, 50%, 80%) on the performance of classification. We generated 90 clustered survival datasets having correlated failure times and 50 covariates at cluster level and at individual level. Each dataset was resampling 1000 times by selecting clusters at random 70% as training datasets and the rest 30% as the test datasets. The performance of a Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach based on shared gamma frailty models with Weibull distribution provided the highest accuracy. All three models, the accuracy tended to increase with an increase in the cluster size and the number of clusters. The accuracy decreased monotonically with increasing the percentage of censoring rate. In conclusion, the use of the Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach constructed from the shared gamma frailty with baseline hazard function as Weibull distribution was recommended.

基于三种脆弱性模型的贝叶斯多变量生存树方法。
本研究比较了由扩展Cox比例风险与gamma脆弱性项构建的贝叶斯多变量生存树方法,以及分别具有指数和威布尔基线风险函数的两种共享gamma脆弱性模型的性能。模拟研究了基线危害函数、聚类数(200、500、1000)、聚类大小(5、10、20)和正确审查率(10%、50%、80%)对分类性能的影响。我们生成了90个集群生存数据集,在集群水平和个体水平上具有相关的失败时间和50个协变量。每个数据集重新采样1000次,随机选择70%的聚类作为训练数据集,其余30%作为测试数据集。基于威布尔分布的共享伽马脆弱性模型的贝叶斯多变量生存树方法的性能提供了最高的准确性。三种模型的准确率均随聚类大小和聚类数量的增加而增加。准确度随审查率百分比的增加而单调降低。综上所述,建议使用基于共享γ脆弱性和基线风险函数作为威布尔分布的贝叶斯多变量生存树方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信