Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation of the cerebellum, parietal cortex, anterior cingulate, and motor cortex on postural adaptation.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Nastaran Bahadorani, Roya Khanmohammadi
{"title":"Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation of the cerebellum, parietal cortex, anterior cingulate, and motor cortex on postural adaptation.","authors":"Nastaran Bahadorani, Roya Khanmohammadi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92617-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several cortical regions, such as the cerebellum, posterior parietal cortex (PPC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and primary motor cortex (M1), play critical roles in postural adaptation. However, studies examining the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on postural adaptation in healthy individuals are limited and often yield inconsistent findings, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions. Most research has focused on individual brain regions, leaving a gap in understanding how the cerebellum, PPC, ACC, and M1 differentially contribute to postural adaptation. Identifying the most effective brain regions for postural adaptation could optimize rehabilitation strategies for individuals with postural control impairments. Thus, this study compared the effects of tDCS over these specific brain regions on postural adaptation. This parallel, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial involved 75 participants, divided into five groups: anodal stimulation of the PPC, cerebellum, M1, ACC, or a sham group. Each group received 20 min of direct current stimulation in a single session. Center of pressure (COP) displacement, path length, velocity, and standard deviation (SD) were measured across three trials in the anteroposterior (AP) direction during standing disturbed using vibrators attached to bilateral Achilles tendons. A repeated measure ANOVA was used to assess within-group effects, while one-way ANOVA compared between-group differences. Between-group analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences during both the vibration and post-vibration phases. Nonetheless, the within-group analysis revealed significant enhancements in postural adaptation for the PPC and cerebellum groups during the vibration phase. Specifically, the PPC group demonstrated significant reductions in COP displacement (P = 0.005), path length (P = 0.018), and SD of COP displacement (P = 0.045) across trials. Similarly, in the cerebellar group, significant improvements were noted in COP displacement (P = 0.044), velocity (P = 0.006), and phase plane (P = 0.016) across trials. In contrast, no significant changes were found in the M1, ACC, or sham groups during either the vibration or post-vibration phases. In conclusion, while intergroup comparisons were not significant, intra-group analysis revealed that PPC and cerebellar stimulation significantly enhanced postural adaptation. Incorporating tDCS over the PPC or cerebellum in postural training programs could improve postural control, potentially reducing fall risk in clinical populations such as older adults or individuals with neurological dysfunction.RCT registration: On the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20220819055745N1). Registration date: 15/11/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11966"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92617-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several cortical regions, such as the cerebellum, posterior parietal cortex (PPC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and primary motor cortex (M1), play critical roles in postural adaptation. However, studies examining the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on postural adaptation in healthy individuals are limited and often yield inconsistent findings, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions. Most research has focused on individual brain regions, leaving a gap in understanding how the cerebellum, PPC, ACC, and M1 differentially contribute to postural adaptation. Identifying the most effective brain regions for postural adaptation could optimize rehabilitation strategies for individuals with postural control impairments. Thus, this study compared the effects of tDCS over these specific brain regions on postural adaptation. This parallel, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial involved 75 participants, divided into five groups: anodal stimulation of the PPC, cerebellum, M1, ACC, or a sham group. Each group received 20 min of direct current stimulation in a single session. Center of pressure (COP) displacement, path length, velocity, and standard deviation (SD) were measured across three trials in the anteroposterior (AP) direction during standing disturbed using vibrators attached to bilateral Achilles tendons. A repeated measure ANOVA was used to assess within-group effects, while one-way ANOVA compared between-group differences. Between-group analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences during both the vibration and post-vibration phases. Nonetheless, the within-group analysis revealed significant enhancements in postural adaptation for the PPC and cerebellum groups during the vibration phase. Specifically, the PPC group demonstrated significant reductions in COP displacement (P = 0.005), path length (P = 0.018), and SD of COP displacement (P = 0.045) across trials. Similarly, in the cerebellar group, significant improvements were noted in COP displacement (P = 0.044), velocity (P = 0.006), and phase plane (P = 0.016) across trials. In contrast, no significant changes were found in the M1, ACC, or sham groups during either the vibration or post-vibration phases. In conclusion, while intergroup comparisons were not significant, intra-group analysis revealed that PPC and cerebellar stimulation significantly enhanced postural adaptation. Incorporating tDCS over the PPC or cerebellum in postural training programs could improve postural control, potentially reducing fall risk in clinical populations such as older adults or individuals with neurological dysfunction.RCT registration: On the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20220819055745N1). Registration date: 15/11/2022.

经颅电刺激小脑、顶叶皮质、前扣带和运动皮质对体位适应的影响。
小脑、后顶叶皮质(PPC)、前扣带皮质(ACC)和初级运动皮质(M1)等几个皮质区域在姿势适应中起着关键作用。然而,关于经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对健康个体体位适应影响的研究有限,而且往往得出不一致的结果,因此很难得出明确的结论。大多数研究都集中在单个大脑区域,在了解小脑、PPC、ACC和M1如何不同地促进姿势适应方面留下了空白。识别最有效的姿势适应脑区可以优化个体的姿势控制障碍的康复策略。因此,本研究比较了tDCS对这些特定脑区对姿势适应的影响。这项平行、随机、双盲、对照试验涉及75名参与者,分为5组:阳极刺激PPC、小脑、M1、ACC或假手术组。每组接受20分钟的单次直流电刺激。使用连接双侧跟腱的振动器,在站立干扰时测量三次前后位(AP)方向的压力中心(COP)位移、路径长度、速度和标准偏差(SD)。采用重复测量方差分析评估组内效应,采用单因素方差分析比较组间差异。组间分析在振动和后振动阶段均未显示统计学上的显著差异。尽管如此,组内分析显示,在振动阶段,PPC组和小脑组的姿势适应性显著增强。具体来说,PPC组在COP位移(P = 0.005)、路径长度(P = 0.018)和COP位移SD (P = 0.045)方面均有显著降低。同样,在小脑组,各试验期间COP位移(P = 0.044)、速度(P = 0.006)和相平面(P = 0.016)均有显著改善。相比之下,M1、ACC或假手术组在振动或后振动阶段均未发现明显变化。综上所述,虽然组间比较不显著,但组内分析显示PPC和小脑刺激显著增强了体位适应。将tDCS与PPC或小脑结合在姿势训练计划中可以改善姿势控制,潜在地降低老年人或神经功能障碍患者等临床人群的跌倒风险。随机对照试验注册:伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT20220819055745N1)。报名日期:15/11/2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信