Exploring physiotherapist's ability to identify cauda equina syndrome early.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Khalid F Althobaiti, Joshua R Zadro, Fahad A Alzhrani, Hosam A Alzahrani
{"title":"Exploring physiotherapist's ability to identify cauda equina syndrome early.","authors":"Khalid F Althobaiti, Joshua R Zadro, Fahad A Alzhrani, Hosam A Alzahrani","doi":"10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the ability of physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia to identify cauda equina syndrome (CES) in a timely manner, and to identify the methods used by physiotherapists to manage patients with suspected CES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a cross-sectional research design and was conducted in the period May-October 2023. It included licensed physiotherapists working in Saudi Arabia. The data was collected using a survey that aimed to assess physiotherapists' ability to identify CES early, using 12 statements. Based on the participants response to these statements, all responders were categorized into the following groups based on their ability to identify and manage CES early: proficient (10-12 points); good ability (7-9); fair ability (5-6); and poor ability (<=4). Consensus to a statement was reached when more than 70% of participants agreed or disagreed with the statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 401 physiotherapists (mean age=29.51 (SD 5.54); 53.4% female). Most participants (63.6%) have a proficient-good ability to identify and manage CES early, while 36.4% were categorized as having fair-poor ability Consensus for the CES statements was achieved for 8 statements [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12] out of 12. Among these statements, most participants agreed that a patient should be suspected to have CES when they exhibited urinary difficulties of neurogenic origin (88.3%) and/or bilateral radiculopathy (85.5%); and 88.0% of them agreed that an MRI should be requested urgently when managing a patient with CES. Conversely, consensus was not achieved on statements, concerning communication with patients, patient instructions, and management decisions for suspected CES cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most physiotherapists had a proficient-good ability to identify and manage CES early. The study's findings can aid in the creation or improvement of clinical standards and protocols pertaining to physiotherapists' roles in the early identification of CES.</p>","PeriodicalId":19284,"journal":{"name":"Neurosciences","volume":"30 2","pages":"101-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the ability of physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia to identify cauda equina syndrome (CES) in a timely manner, and to identify the methods used by physiotherapists to manage patients with suspected CES.

Methods: This study utilized a cross-sectional research design and was conducted in the period May-October 2023. It included licensed physiotherapists working in Saudi Arabia. The data was collected using a survey that aimed to assess physiotherapists' ability to identify CES early, using 12 statements. Based on the participants response to these statements, all responders were categorized into the following groups based on their ability to identify and manage CES early: proficient (10-12 points); good ability (7-9); fair ability (5-6); and poor ability (<=4). Consensus to a statement was reached when more than 70% of participants agreed or disagreed with the statement.

Results: This study included 401 physiotherapists (mean age=29.51 (SD 5.54); 53.4% female). Most participants (63.6%) have a proficient-good ability to identify and manage CES early, while 36.4% were categorized as having fair-poor ability Consensus for the CES statements was achieved for 8 statements [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12] out of 12. Among these statements, most participants agreed that a patient should be suspected to have CES when they exhibited urinary difficulties of neurogenic origin (88.3%) and/or bilateral radiculopathy (85.5%); and 88.0% of them agreed that an MRI should be requested urgently when managing a patient with CES. Conversely, consensus was not achieved on statements, concerning communication with patients, patient instructions, and management decisions for suspected CES cases.

Conclusion: Most physiotherapists had a proficient-good ability to identify and manage CES early. The study's findings can aid in the creation or improvement of clinical standards and protocols pertaining to physiotherapists' roles in the early identification of CES.

探讨物理治疗师早期识别马尾综合征的能力。
目的:探讨沙特阿拉伯物理治疗师及时识别马尾综合征(CES)的能力,并确定物理治疗师对疑似CES患者的管理方法。方法:本研究采用横断面研究设计,研究时间为2023年5月- 10月。其中包括在沙特阿拉伯工作的有执照的物理治疗师。数据是通过一项调查收集的,该调查旨在评估物理治疗师早期识别CES的能力,使用了12项陈述。根据参与者对这些陈述的反应,根据他们早期识别和管理CES的能力,将所有应答者分为以下几组:精通(10-12分);能力好(7-9分);能力一般(5-6);结果:本研究纳入401名物理治疗师,平均年龄29.51岁(SD 5.54);53.4%的女性)。大多数参与者(63.6%)在早期识别和管理CES方面具有熟练-良好的能力,而36.4%被归类为具有中等-较差的能力,在12个陈述中,有8个陈述[1,2,3,4,5,8,9,12]达到了对CES陈述的共识。在这些声明中,大多数参与者认为,当患者表现出神经源性泌尿困难(88.3%)和/或双侧神经根病(85.5%)时,应怀疑患有CES;88.0%的人认为在处理CES患者时应紧急要求进行MRI检查。相反,关于与患者沟通、患者指示和疑似CES病例的管理决策的声明未达成共识。结论:大多数物理治疗师具有较好的早期识别和管理能力。该研究的发现有助于创建或改进临床标准和协议,这些标准和协议与物理治疗师在早期识别CES中的作用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosciences
Neurosciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Neurosciences is an open access, peer-reviewed, quarterly publication. Authors are invited to submit for publication articles reporting original work related to the nervous system, e.g., neurology, neurophysiology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurorehabilitation, neurooncology, neuropsychiatry, and neurogenetics, etc. Basic research withclear clinical implications will also be considered. Review articles of current interest and high standard are welcomed for consideration. Prospective workshould not be backdated. There are also sections for Case Reports, Brief Communication, Correspondence, and medical news items. To promote continuous education, training, and learning, we include Clinical Images and MCQ’s. Highlights of international and regional meetings of interest, and specialized supplements will also be considered. All submissions must conform to the Uniform Requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信