Implementation of real-time PCR assays for diagnosing intestinal protozoa infections.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Christian N Lotz, Pierre H H Schneeberger, Maura Concu, Said M Ali, Emmanuel C Mrimi, Jennifer Keiser
{"title":"Implementation of real-time PCR assays for diagnosing intestinal protozoa infections.","authors":"Christian N Lotz, Pierre H H Schneeberger, Maura Concu, Said M Ali, Emmanuel C Mrimi, Jennifer Keiser","doi":"10.1007/s00436-025-08483-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intestinal protozoa infections present a major public health challenge, particularly in areas with poor sanitation and limited access to clean water. Effective diagnostic methods are critical, yet traditional microscopy, though widely used for its simplicity, lacks the sensitivity and specificity of modern techniques like real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), making the latter a more effective tool for monitoring and assessing the burden of intestinal protozoa diseases. In this study, we implemented two duplex qPCR assays to detect Entamoeba dispar + Entamoeba histolytica and Cryptosporidium spp. + Chilomastix mesnili, along with singleplex assays for Giardia duodenalis and Blastocystis spp., using a 10 µL reaction volume. This marks the first molecular detection of Chilomastix mesnili by qPCR, enhancing diagnostic precision. Using these, we analyzed stool samples from 70 patients on Pemba Island, Tanzania, before and 54 samples after treatment with 20, 25, or 30 mg of emodepside or placebo, aiming to assess protozoa prevalence for this region and emodepside's potential antiprotozoal effects. Our qPCR reliably detected protozoa in 74.4% of samples, with Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in 31.4% of cases. Notably, one-third of these infections were caused by Entamoeba histolytica. No significant reduction in protozoa was observed after emodepside treatment compared to placebo. The study highlights the utility of qPCR in providing species-level differentiation and improving the speed and cost-effectiveness of testing. The high prevalence of protozoa in this region underscores the need for continued monitoring and control efforts, though emodepside was not effective against protozoa infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":19968,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology Research","volume":"124 4","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-025-08483-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intestinal protozoa infections present a major public health challenge, particularly in areas with poor sanitation and limited access to clean water. Effective diagnostic methods are critical, yet traditional microscopy, though widely used for its simplicity, lacks the sensitivity and specificity of modern techniques like real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), making the latter a more effective tool for monitoring and assessing the burden of intestinal protozoa diseases. In this study, we implemented two duplex qPCR assays to detect Entamoeba dispar + Entamoeba histolytica and Cryptosporidium spp. + Chilomastix mesnili, along with singleplex assays for Giardia duodenalis and Blastocystis spp., using a 10 µL reaction volume. This marks the first molecular detection of Chilomastix mesnili by qPCR, enhancing diagnostic precision. Using these, we analyzed stool samples from 70 patients on Pemba Island, Tanzania, before and 54 samples after treatment with 20, 25, or 30 mg of emodepside or placebo, aiming to assess protozoa prevalence for this region and emodepside's potential antiprotozoal effects. Our qPCR reliably detected protozoa in 74.4% of samples, with Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in 31.4% of cases. Notably, one-third of these infections were caused by Entamoeba histolytica. No significant reduction in protozoa was observed after emodepside treatment compared to placebo. The study highlights the utility of qPCR in providing species-level differentiation and improving the speed and cost-effectiveness of testing. The high prevalence of protozoa in this region underscores the need for continued monitoring and control efforts, though emodepside was not effective against protozoa infections.

实时荧光定量PCR检测肠道原虫感染的实施。
肠道原生动物感染是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,特别是在卫生条件差和获得清洁水的机会有限的地区。有效的诊断方法至关重要,然而传统显微镜虽然因其简单而广泛使用,但缺乏实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)等现代技术的敏感性和特异性,使后者成为监测和评估肠道原生动物疾病负担的更有效工具。在本研究中,我们使用10µL的反应体积,对异巴内阿米巴+溶组织内阿米巴和隐孢子虫+隐孢子虫进行了两次双工pcr检测,同时对十二指肠贾第虫和囊虫进行了单工pcr检测。这标志着首次采用qPCR技术检测到mesnili Chilomastix分子,提高了诊断精度。利用这些方法,我们分析了坦桑尼亚彭巴岛70名患者的粪便样本,分别在接受20、25或30 mg emodepside或安慰剂治疗前和治疗后的54份样本,旨在评估该地区的原虫流行情况和emodepside潜在的抗原虫作用。我们的qPCR在74.4%的样本中可靠地检测到原生动物,在31.4%的病例中,溶组织内阿米巴和内阿米巴不一致。值得注意的是,这些感染中有三分之一是由溶组织内阿米巴引起的。与安慰剂相比,emodepside治疗后未观察到原生动物的显著减少。该研究强调了qPCR在提供物种水平分化和提高检测速度和成本效益方面的效用。该地区原生动物的高流行率强调了继续监测和控制工作的必要性,尽管emodepside对原生动物感染无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology Research
Parasitology Research 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal Parasitology Research covers the latest developments in parasitology across a variety of disciplines, including biology, medicine and veterinary medicine. Among many topics discussed are chemotherapy and control of parasitic disease, and the relationship of host and parasite. Other coverage includes: Protozoology, Helminthology, Entomology; Morphology (incl. Pathomorphology, Ultrastructure); Biochemistry, Physiology including Pathophysiology; Parasite-Host-Relationships including Immunology and Host Specificity; life history, ecology and epidemiology; and Diagnosis, Chemotherapy and Control of Parasitic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信