Facilitator development for pre-registration health professions simulation: a scoping review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-24-00130
Renée Gordon, Jaime Riley, Diana Dupont, Beth Rogers, Richelle Witherspoon, Kelly Day, Elizabeth Horsley, Laura Killam
{"title":"Facilitator development for pre-registration health professions simulation: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Renée Gordon, Jaime Riley, Diana Dupont, Beth Rogers, Richelle Witherspoon, Kelly Day, Elizabeth Horsley, Laura Killam","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The growing demand for health professional education intensifies the need for learning innovations such as simulation: facilitating predictable, realistic, experiential learning that prepares students for practice. To achieve this, facilitators must provide pedagogically sound, psychologically safe simulation. High-quality simulation enhances students' self-efficacy, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning. Despite increasing integration of simulation into curricula, best practices for facilitator development remain unknown, risking the quality and safety of simulations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will identify the extent and type of evidence guiding the development of simulation facilitators in pre-registration health professional programs for any type and stage of simulation.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider reports on simulation facilitator development for educators of pre-registration health professional students in academic settings. The simulation may be delivered using any delivery modality and in any language. Reports focused on simulation facilitators working in professional settings, within graduate programs, or with already licensed learners will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, ERIC (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, from 2005 to the present. Titles and abstracts, followed by full-text articles, will be screened by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using a pre-defined data extraction form and content analysis will be conducted. Extracted data will be presented using tables, charts, and a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/wf9zc.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 4","pages":"812-821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The growing demand for health professional education intensifies the need for learning innovations such as simulation: facilitating predictable, realistic, experiential learning that prepares students for practice. To achieve this, facilitators must provide pedagogically sound, psychologically safe simulation. High-quality simulation enhances students' self-efficacy, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning. Despite increasing integration of simulation into curricula, best practices for facilitator development remain unknown, risking the quality and safety of simulations.

Objective: This scoping review will identify the extent and type of evidence guiding the development of simulation facilitators in pre-registration health professional programs for any type and stage of simulation.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider reports on simulation facilitator development for educators of pre-registration health professional students in academic settings. The simulation may be delivered using any delivery modality and in any language. Reports focused on simulation facilitators working in professional settings, within graduate programs, or with already licensed learners will be excluded.

Methods: The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, ERIC (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, from 2005 to the present. Titles and abstracts, followed by full-text articles, will be screened by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using a pre-defined data extraction form and content analysis will be conducted. Extracted data will be presented using tables, charts, and a narrative summary.

Review registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/wf9zc.

注册前卫生专业模拟的促进器开发:范围审查协议。
导读:对卫生专业教育不断增长的需求加强了对学习创新的需求,如模拟:促进可预测的、现实的、体验式的学习,为学生的实践做好准备。要做到这一点,辅导员必须提供教学上合理、心理上安全的模拟。高质量的模拟可以提高学生的自我效能感、批判性思维和临床推理能力。尽管越来越多地将模拟整合到课程中,但促进器开发的最佳实践仍然未知,这危及了模拟的质量和安全性。目的:这一范围综述将确定在任何类型和阶段的模拟注册前卫生专业项目中指导模拟促进器发展的证据的程度和类型。纳入标准:本综述将考虑在学术环境中为注册前卫生专业学生的教育工作者开发模拟促进器的报告。仿真可以使用任何交付方式和以任何语言交付。专注于在专业环境中、研究生课程中或已经获得许可的学习者中工作的模拟促进者的报告将被排除在外。方法:审查将遵循JBI方法进行范围审查。检索的数据库包括2005年至今的CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase、ERIC (EBSCOhost)、MEDLINE (Ovid)和ProQuest Dissertation and Theses。题目和摘要以及全文将由2名独立审稿人进行筛选。使用预先定义的数据提取表单提取数据,并进行内容分析。提取的数据将使用表格、图表和叙述性摘要来呈现。评审注册:开放科学框架:https://osf.io/wf9zc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信